tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post1761056658473014271..comments2023-11-02T03:08:07.417-07:00Comments on NephiCode: For a Better Understanding – Part IIDelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08982095508142923740noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post-79155594402623013002018-02-22T10:15:01.586-08:002018-02-22T10:15:01.586-08:00Right on. It was John L. Sorenson who first claime...Right on. It was John L. Sorenson who first claimed that the damage and changes described in 3 Nephi were just cosmetic. Every theorist since his book has taken that as gospel--very few actually cite scripture along with their their discussions. It is as though to them the Book of Mormon is merely starting point and they can then add to it whatever they think is applicable to further their narrative and beliefs. Delhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08982095508142923740noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post-54633315349725404942018-02-22T09:18:18.776-08:002018-02-22T09:18:18.776-08:00The thing I find interesting is that neither the M...The thing I find interesting is that neither the Meso-American and North American theorists never claim that their proposed narrow neck was altered at the time of the great upheaval at the time of Christ. That event is prophesied in Helaman and yet none of the theorists claim that their narrow neck was changed. They simply do not believe that anything of significance happened at the time of Christ. <br /><br />The opposite is true of the South American model because that model follows the scriptures. Point is the other models do not follow scripture. iterryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14836783863542965577noreply@blogger.com