tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post2161897519908647053..comments2023-11-02T03:08:07.417-07:00Comments on NephiCode: Is There Really Evidence for a Young Earth? – Part IVDelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08982095508142923740noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post-2626204603786972362019-12-11T11:46:08.094-08:002019-12-11T11:46:08.094-08:00Yes I am aware that the Creationist scientists are...Yes I am aware that the Creationist scientists are "striking back" with some good explanations that support the Bible flood account. <br /><br />This video by the Genesis Apologetics channel includes many of the things that Del explained a while back.<br /><br /><a href="https://youtu.be/eOcndUvedGc" rel="nofollow">Noah's Flood on North America</a>George Washingtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09408308975569715587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post-41802863045918909672019-12-10T16:55:59.471-08:002019-12-10T16:55:59.471-08:00Yes, GW. That is why I always say that ICR has it ...Yes, GW. That is why I always say that ICR has it mailed with the flood, but really struggles with the creation. They insist that everything in the universe was created in 6 Earth days, including light that had been traveling millions of years just to reach our eyes. They have no real scientific defense for that theory. But they have a lot of scientific defense for the flood. There is also a lot scientific disproof of the "big bang", but that's not too say that the universe hasn't been in existence for a very, very long time... There's no known way to truly measure how long.Todd Durranthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08849004044712535542noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post-82988698084409285292019-12-10T10:49:36.456-08:002019-12-10T10:49:36.456-08:00Almost all those that believe and teach creationis...Almost all those that believe and teach creationism (except Mormons) will ALSO teach that God created time, space and all matter and things OUT OF NOTHING. <br /><br />So even though I fully accept creationism, I also realize that in their rejection of the ex nihilo doctrine the scientists are correct. <br /><br />Do the scriptures really teach that all the stars that we see, which scientists say are multiple light years away suns and galaxies, were created 13,000 or so years ago?<br /><br />Looking at the stars is direct observation, not some theory like abiogenesis. Are these stars as far away as scientific observation claims? If so, the universe we are in must be millions of years old in the least.George Washingtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09408308975569715587noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5948352943362975805.post-38627147714057623642019-12-09T09:37:39.091-08:002019-12-09T09:37:39.091-08:00Creationism, even when perfectly scientific, is in...Creationism, even when perfectly scientific, is instantly labeled as "pseudo science" in order to destroy any credibility in its findings. One need look no further than Wikipedia to see Creationism mocked and discredited. That criticism is ironically unscientific, since science is supposed to follow the data and observations wherever they lead.Todd Durranthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08849004044712535542noreply@blogger.com