Continuing from the last three posts, listing actual
descriptions of the scriptural record of the Book of Mormon and how any Land of
Promise model should match all of
those listed in that writing. We have earlier covered 1) Mountains, “whose height is great”; 2) Two unknown
animals; 3) Two unknown grains; 4) Plants that cure fever; 5) Land of promise
as an island; 6) The four seas surrounding the Land of Promise; 7) the Climate
where Lehi’s seeds grew that he brought to the Land of Promise; 8) Roads and
Highways; 9) Driven before the wind; 10) Lehi’s Course to the Land of Promise;
and 11) Both Gold and Silver and Copper.
Another
important criteria has to do with a simple statement about Hagoth’s ships.
Though extremely important, it is often ignored. Mormon wrote: “And it came to pass that Hagoth, he being an
exceedingly curious man, therefore he went forth and built him an exceedingly
large ship, on the borders of the land Bountiful, by the land Desolation, and
launched it forth into the west sea, by the narrow neck which led into the land
northward. And behold, there were many of the Nephites who did enter therein
and did sail forth with much provisions, and also many women and children; and
they took their course northward” (Alma 63:5-6).
Two important points are made
here: 1) The ship was launched into the
West Sea; and 2) the ship then “took
their course northward.” Though a simple statement, it is amazing how
little attention is paid to its importance in better understanding the Land of
Promise.
For
Hagoth’s ships to leave the area of Mesoamerica’s Isthmus of Tehuantepec
(narrow neck of land) and set sail into the Pacific Ocean (West Sea), they
would have had to travel 120 miles in a southwesterly direction, then 25 miles
in a due west direction, then 750 miles in a northwesterly direction before it
could have turned onto a northward (red arrow) direction, which is the
direction Mormon tells us the ships initially took (Alma 63:6)
Obviously, any model of the Land of Promise would have to have a west sea coastline that ran north and south, not east and west as Mesoamerica does.
Yet another description that enables us to look more
closely at a Land of Promise location is the continual use of forts, fortifications,
and resorts (small fort) mentioned in the scriptural record. In the book of
Alma alone, resort is used 3 times, fort l4, fortifications 8, fortify
or fortified 13, and stronghold 14 times.
As an example, Moroni “had been strengthening the armies of the Nephites, and erecting small
fort or places of resort; throwing up banks of earth round about to enclose his
armies, and also building walls of stone to encircle them about, round about
their cities and the borders of their lands; yea, all round about the land”
(Alma 48:8), And in their weakest fortifications he did place the greater
number of men; and thus he did fortify and strengthen the land which was
possessed by the Nephites” (Alma 48:9).
Thus, we should find all sorts of forts, stone
walls, and high-ground fortresses throughout the Land of Promise. Moroni not
only dug ditches and built walls of timber for these fortress walls (Alma
49:18-22; 50:1-6), but he also built “walls of stone to encircle them about,
round about their cities and the borders of their lands; yea, all round about
the land” (Alma 48:8).
Obviously, these fortifications were not just wooden
stockade walls that would deteriorate over time and disappear, but also built
walls of stone that would not only withstand a concentrated attack by the
enemy, but last for centuries.
Top:
Stone walls erected for defense; Bottom: Small forts, or resorts, that often
served as lookout positions for the larger army
While the purpose of these small forts, or resorts,
is not mentioned in the scriptural record, other than they are included with
the construction of defensive strongholds (Alma 52:6), it must be concluded
that they served a defensive purpose in the war against the Lamanites. It
should also be mentioned that the first mention of resorts is in connection
with the defector Zoramites “being the most acquainted with the strength of the
Nephites, and their places of resort” (Alma 48:5), suggesting that the
Zoramites, having lived among the Nephites, were not only well acquainted with
the strength of their cities (fortresses), stone walls, etc., but also their
small forts—which can only mean that they knew about the Nephite system of
warning outposts. Nor were these fortifications in just one particular area,
for “Moroni had fortified, or had built forts of security, for every city in
all the land round about” (Alma 49:13; see also 50:11 and 62:42).
Obviously, any Land of Promise location must show not only erected buildings, impressive as they might be, but
such fortified areas, stone walls, hillside or mountainous small forts as a
remnant of a once powerful Nephite nation that withstood the constant attacks
of a dedicated enemy for nearly 800 years before being finally exterminated.
While there are many stone edifices in Mesoamerica, there are few fortresses
and no outpost stone structures serving as lookout resorts. There are none
whatever in any of the other suggested locations for the Land of Promise,
except of the crudest manner. Such structures are only found in the Andean area
of South America, in Ecuador, Peru and
Bolivia.
It is obvious that these forts and fortresses found all over the Andean area of Peru, western Bolivia and Ecuador were built for defense. Walls surround most, and others were built on hilltops, and still others had such small entrances that an enemy could onlly enter one at a time in single file
There is also a particular mention of a
fortification that the Nephites built across the land to stop the advance
northward of the Lamanite invasion. At this time, in 36 B.C., three years after
Helaman died, the war broke out with great fervor—a war that saw the Lamanites
conquering all of the Land of Zarahemla and driving the Nephites and
Moronihah’s army back into the Land of Bountiful. Mormon writes: “and there they did fortify against the
Lamanites, from the west sea, even unto the east; it being a day's journey for
a Nephite, on the line which they had fortified and stationed their armies to
defend their north country” (Helaman 4:7).
For two years this war progressed, no doubt, from city
to city in the Land of Zarahemla, as Nephite dissenters stirred up the
Lamanites to battle. So heated was the war, that the Nephites lost almost all
of the Land Southward until they were driven back to a point where Moronihah
had the Nephites build a fortified wall across the land in Bountiful after the
army retreated northward. This fortified line evidently was so successful, that
it stopped the Lamanite advance, and the following year saw the Nephite army
retaking many parts of the land and regaining many cities which had previously
fallen into the hands of the Lamanites (Helaman 4:9). The year after the
Nephites gained more, even half of all their previous possessions in the Land
Southward (Halaman 4:10).
Obviously, then, this was no mere ditch or mounded
earth piled up, but an impenetrable, well fortified wall that stretched across
the land from the west sea eastward. Since this wall was the length of a day’s
journey for a Nephite (Helaman 4:7), it obviously had some eastward terminus
that was impassable by the Lamanites, such as deep canyons and steep mountains.
Nor was this wall a mere temporary, quickly constructed chest-high
fortification (breastwork, barricade or parapet), but a sturdy, stone wall
(bulwark) that stopped the Lamanite invaders in their tracks and turned the
tide of the three year war.
Top: The Great Wall of Peru, built to defend
against attack from the south (right) runs parallel to the north side of the
Santa Valley; Bottom: the walls as it crossed the mountain passes and along the
ridges
This Great Wall of Peru, which stretches from the
west coast of northern Peru near the mouth of the Santa River in what is now a
large marsh, was stone and broken rocks set in mud mortar as it crossed the
Santa Valley and hilly interior. It stood as high as 20 to 30 feet, with 14
stone fortresses located on hills overlooking the wall, dated to the period
between 900 B.C. to 100 B.C.
Top: Parts of the Great Wall of Peru still standing today; Bottom: The wall ran from near the mouth of the Santa River, up along the
river for several miles, then along the north ridge of the Santa Valley to near
Corongo, effectively cutting off any movement from the south to the north
because of the steep, almost sheer mountains beyond that point
This should suggest to all who study the scriptural
record, that any true Land of Promise must match all of the descriptions listed
in the Book of Mormon—it is not a pick and choose arrangement in selecting
those that agree with your point of view, but must match all of the descriptions, beginning with these first 14 covered in
these three posts.
(See the next post,
“So Where is the Land of Promise? –
Part V,” for more of these descriptions as listed in the scriptural record of
the Book of Mormon)
No comments:
Post a Comment