When it comes to the Land
Northward Phyllis Carol Olive takes an interesting, but non-supportive view of
this in her diagram map. First of all, the one separately published does not
show the full extent of her Land Northward. As can be seen from the map below,
it would appear that the Land Northward was simply north of her Lake Tonawanda
and, though quite narrow, appears to at least be placed in a correct north
position from the rest of her map, i.e., the Land Southward, Bountiful,
Zarahemla, etc.
Olive identifies the (white arrow) Land
Northward in her model
However, the problem arises when
we look into her book at a full map of her Land of Promise and see that she has
added a very large extension of her Land Northward to the northeast of her
other map. In this case, the land extends in a very narrow sliver to the south
of her Sea North (Lake Ontario), then curves around the east of the lake and
continues north and east.
Yellow area is her Land Northward. The Red Arrows point to her labels
of Land “Northward,” and the green arrow points to her extension to the north
and east of her Land of Many Waters
Again, the problem arises when
we try to match this to the scriptural record. First of all, her Land of Many
Waters is not in her Land Northward, and is to the east of her East Sea, both
of which are inaccurate according to Mormon’s descriptions. He, of course,
places the Land of Many Waters far to the north in the Land Northward, where
the final battle between the Lamanites and Nephites took place (Mormon 6:4).
She also places her Land of Many Waters far to the east of her Land Southward,
again in violation of Mormon’s very clear description of the Land of Zarahemla
being in the south, the Land of Bountiful to the north of that, the narrow neck of
land to the north of that, and the Land of Desolation to the north of that in
the Land Northward (Alma 22:27-34).
Blue Arrow points to the Land of Many Waters, which is directly east of
the Sea East, which is directly east of the Land Southward—none of which agrees
with Mormon’s descriptions
Now we come to the placement of
the Sea East, which Olive correctly places in the diagram below to the east of
the Land Southward; however, her Sea East ends south of her Land Northward, and
does not continue to the east of her Land Northward as Ether so obviously
describes when Omer departs out of the land and “traveled many days, and came
over and passed by the hill Shim, and came over by the place where the Nephites
were destroyed (hill Cumorah) and from thence eastward, and came to a place which was called Ablolm, by the seashore, and there he pitched
his tent” (Ether 9:3, emphasis mine).
Thus, there is an East Sea to
the east of the Land of Many Waters (where the Nephites were destroyed) in the
Land Northward, but Olive shows no East Sea to the east of either the Land
Northward or the Land of Many Waters.
Blue Arrow: the East Sea, and the Orange Arrow: There is no East Sea in
her Land Northward
In addition, there were many
Nephite cities built along the eastern seashore (Sea East), beginning with
Moroni in the far south, near the Land of Nephi and the Lamanite lands (Alma
50:13), and those cities, as they went northward from Moroni, were Nephihah,
Lehi, Morianton, Omner, Gid, and Mulek (Alma 51:24, 26); however, Olive places
them from south to north: Mulek, Moroni, Nephiha, Aaron, Antionan, Morianton,
Jershon, Lehi, Omner, Gid, and Bountiful (map below from her book, p 317).
The important thing, other than
these being inaccurately place, she has Mulek in the far south, in fact south
of the narrow strip of wilderness, which puts it in the Land Southward (Alma
22:27), whereas Mormon places the city of Mulek along the east sea to the east
of the city of Bountiful, in the far north, where Teancum marches to the west
of Mulek (Alma 52:22), toward the city of Bountiful (Alma 22:27), but when
Moroni’s army attacked from one side, with Teancum;’s army on the other, the
Lamanites retreated toward Mulek (22:34). After the battle, with Moroni wounded
and Jacob killed (Alma 22:35), Moroni then went to the city of Mulek (Alma
53:2) while the captured Lamanites were set to labor digging ditches around the
city of Bountiful (Alma 53:3).
Left: Red Arrow: Land of Bountiful; Green Arrow:
Land of Zarahemla; Orange Arrow: Land of Nephi; Blue Arrow: City of Mulek;
Brown Arrow: City of Moroni. Note that Moroni is north of Mulek, and Mulek is
far south of Bountiful in opposition to Mormon’s descriptions; Right: Red
Arrow: City of Bountiful; Green Arrow: City of Lehi; Brown Arrow: City of
Moroni; Blue Arrow: City of Mulek
Thus, quite contrary to Olive’s
placement of the Sea East and the cities along it, Mulek is in the extreme
south in the Land of Zarahemla and Bountiful is in the extreme north of the
Land of Bountiful.
It seems unnecessary, if not
downright fallacious to place cities, lands and seas in such outlandish
positions when Mormon has taken the time to place them in relationship to one
another for us, inserting the information for his future reader (Alma 22:27-34),
and then listing those areas as they related to the events as they unfold in
the words of the original writers, so that their information will make sense to
us with Mormon’s mental map. What, then, is the purpose of rearranging the
lands and cities and seas?
Obviously, because in Olive’s
map, the placements are made for her once she chose to use the area around the
Great Lakes as the land of Promise. And just as obviously, her land and map
simply do not agree with and follow the descriptions Mormon left us so we could
better understand the events in the scriptural record as they unfolded. When
Theorists go so far afield in their models and writing, one can only wonder why
Mormon went to the trouble of trying to give us a clear picture of the events
he describes in the first place.
Quite often as I read some of the things that the theorist have to say concerning their models and how hard they pound the round pegs into those square holes.. and pound the square pegs into round holes. They just want it so bad they will blind themselves to the truth.
ReplyDeleteBut then this is the same that happens when people look at other faiths. They need theirs to be the right one that they will forgo new information to retain the old.
I actually feel very sorry for Olive. You can see she is a very bright and passionate woman and she wants her theory to be the right one. How hard it is to let go.. to dismiss the obvious. Same goes for MesoAmerica and the east/west direction of their "narrow neck" They somehow rationalize data that common sense would say is not applicable.
I admire you for taking the time to show many the common sense approach to looking at all of these Land of Promises and to realize that there can only be ONE.
Unfortunately, many mistaken models are not going away anytime soon because peoples' livelihoods depend on them--not just the amateur hucksters like the Meldrums of the world, but the institutional, professional ones like those pushing MA. Those are the worst because because they have the appearance of quasi-legitimacy. Institutionalized ignorance is the worst because it's entrenched and gets passed on.
ReplyDeleteThank you both for your very astute comments.
ReplyDelete