It is difficult to
reconcile a viewpoint when that viewpoint is held in segmented parts. In this
case, the problem with Mesoamericanists is they isolate themselves in their
thinking, i.e., that is, they see each individual subject as a separate subject
and make no effort to connect it to the overall “history” or events of the Book
of Mormon surrounding their subject. In the last post we showed this in the
building of the non-combatant city Teotihuacan during the final years of the
last battle between the Nephites and the Lamanites, i.e., from 300 to about 400
A.D., the latter period when the city and region reached its peak at a time
when the Nephite nationa was annihilated?
Does that make sense?
However, let’s
continue with the events taking place in the scriptural record while this huge
city complex is supposedly being built in the Land of Promise.
The Teotihuacan complex containing the third largest pyramid in the
world and one of the largest sites in the Western Hemisphere, considered to
have taken more than a hundred years to build
7. The Lamanites
drove the Nephites out of Angola, and then out of the land of David and the Nephites
marched to the land of Joshua, gathering in all the people as fast as it were
possible, "that we might get them together in one body" (Mormon 2:6);
8. There was fighting
and “blood and carnage spread throughout all the face of the land, both on the
part of the Nephites and also on the part of the Lamanites; and it was one
complete revolution throughout all the face of the land” (Mormon 2:8);
9. About 30 years
into the building of the city, the Lamanites, with an army of forty-four
thousand, came against the Nephites, who had an army of forty-two thousand;
10. There began to be
a mourning and a lamentation in all the land as the Nephites, not for
repentance, but “sorrowed like the damned because the Lord would not always
suffer them to take happiness in sin” (Mormon 2:13), and they “cursed God and
wished to die, nevertheless they struggled with the sword for their lives”
(Mormon 2:14);
11. While this city
was being built, “thousands of Nephites were hewn down in open rebellion
against their God and heaped up as dung upon the face of the land, for the day
of grace was passed with them, both temporally and spiritually” (Mormon 2:15);
12. The Lamanites
were relentless and chased the fleeing Nerphites to Jashon in the Land
Northward, which was near the land where Amaron had deposited the records
(Mormon 2:16-17).
13. Forty-five years
into the building of the city, the Lamanites were driven far northward to the
land called Shem in the Land Northward, a city they fortified in hopes of
defending themselves that they might save them from destruction (Mormon
2:20-21).
Now keep in mind that
while all of this is going on, with the Lamanites driving the Nephites all
across the Land of Promise, and now far to the north and near where the city of
Teotihuacan was being built, yet while the Nephites were fortifying the city of
Shem in hopes it might save them from destruction, other Nephites were building
this vast, huge city of Teotihuacan that had no fortifications at all? Where is
the logic in that?
14. The Nephites
outnumbered by 50,000 Lamanites to their own 32,000, just a short distance from
Teotihuacan fought valiantly and over a period of time, not requiring those
thousands building the city nearby to aid them, they were finally able to drive
the Lamanites and Robbers out of the north countries and obtain a treaty that
divided the Land of Promise with the Nephites obtaining all of the Land
Northward.
Teotilhuacan was built on a flat land in a
valley surrounded by low hills without a single defensive wall or other earthen
work to defend itself against the constantly attacking Lamanites who waged a devastating war
in the Land Northward during this time
However, after a ten
year hiatus in which Mormon employed his people to build preparing their land
and their homes against the time of battle (Mormon 3:1), but for some reason,
never bothered those building that city Sorenson claims was being built at this
time. In fact, while the final battles took place in the Land Northward in
which 230,000 Nephite warriors and their wives and children were eventually
wiped out in 385 A.D. and not a man survived but Moroni, and the Lamanites and
Robbers then entered into a long-lasting and bloody civil war between
themselves, this city Sorenson tells us about in the Land of Promise flourished
and reached its peak at the very moment the entire Nephite Nation was wiped
out, and continued for a hundred hears in its greatness at the very time this
civil war was blooding the land.
Now tell me that makes sense!
The problem lies with
Mesoamericanists as they isolate themselves from the scriptural record and
spend their efforts in secular work. They study 16th to 18th
century A.D. writings and the archaeological ruins found in Mesoamerica, start
piecing their information together, and come up with answers without benefit of
the scriptural record. When their findings do not agree with the scriptural
record of the Book of Mormon, they tend to find ways to discredit the work of
the prophets and substitute their own meanings instead. During a hundred year
period when the Nephite nation is struggling to survive, being driven from city
to city by the pursuing Lamanite armies, trying to gather in those they could,
and those who could not keep up were wiped out by the approaching Lamanites or
captured and sacrificed to their idols, Sorenson would have us believe the
Nephites were building one of the largest cultural sites found in their Land of
Promise. When the scriptural record shows the fallacy of such thinking, they
disregard the record and maintain the authenticity of the ruins as they make
every effort to show you that Mesoamerica was the Land of Promise despite all
these discrepancies.
In addition,
Sorenson’s writing on this subject is to try and prove that new, modern science
has found reasons to match the Book of Mormon by telling us that these Mayans
were not the people always thought of as “peacefully contemplating and worshiping
a complex set of gods, gazing at notable art, playing philosophical games with
their calendar, and otherwise acting like ‘the Greeks of the New World’.”
Rather than militarism showing its ugly head around 1000 A.D., it was always
there.
The moat and earthen defensive works at
Becan, Campeche, Mexico, occupied in 550 B.C., but the moat and earthen
defensive works were not built until around 250 A.D., during the end of the
so-called Nephite Golden Age, when they were just ending their period of
peaceful coexistence with everyone and the Lamanites were beginning to reoccur
once again
Sorenson goes on to
show us that a mote and defensive earthworks system at Becan Campeche, Mexico,
shows proof that the Mayans were, indeed, involved in warfare at an earlier
date. On the other hand, he forgets that his point of Teotilhuacan is lost in
the fact that this vast enterprise, built during the final hundred hears of war
leading up to the Nephite annihilation, with battles going on all around it, was
not built with any defensive works at all—no walls, no pits, no towers, no
defensive earthworks whatsoever!
In his article,
trying to tie Mesoamerica into the scriptural record, Sorenson writes, “Defenders, possibly screened by
a palisade, could have rained long-distance missiles on approaching enemies
using spear throwers and slings.” This sounds almost like a paraphrase of Alma
49:18-20.”
The trouble is, it sounds like a paraphrase of any battle
recorded where the defense of a city is involved, from the battle of Troy to
the defense of Rome, to the fighting in Gaul and elsewhere.
He writes that “Part of the three
kilometers of defensive walls at famous Monte Alban dates before 200 B.C., but in the Land of Promise, in 200 B.C., 4 Nephi tells us that
“there was still peace in the land” (4 Nephi
1:20) and had been for 80 and four years before that, in fact, for 194
years following Christ’s appearance (4 Nephi 1:21).
One
might want to ask Sorenson why were the Nephites building moated earthworks of
defense at Monte Alban during this 200-plus years of peace and security in the
land? In fact, the division among the people did not take place until 231 A.D.
(4 Nephi 1:35). While wickedness reigned in the latter part of this third
century, peace still remained in the land and not until Mormon, in 320 A.D.
writes of a renewal of battles, do we find any reason why the Nephites would
have been building moats at the time they seem to be flourishing in
Mesoamerica.
No comments:
Post a Comment