Continuing with how theorists
often overlook the clear and meaningful understanding of the scriptural record,
skipping right over important passages of explanation, we covered in the last post, as Nephi tells us, after all the doubt and rebellious attitudes toward
his ability to build a ship, “And it came to pass that after I had finished the
ship, according to the word of the Lord, my brethren beheld that it was good,
and that the workmanship thereof was exceedingly fine” (1 Nephi 18:4), what
does that tell us?
• Third: Little
expertise would be needed, except for holding to a single course, at least
initially—the main thing would be to hold on, keep the rudder level
(“amidships”) and enjoy the ride out into deep water, something Nephi, Sam and
Zoram could have handled during those initial “many days”;
What must have
bothered the mutinous and rebellious brothers, other than not wanting to work,
they felt caught in a family circumstance where their younger brother was
lording the right of decision making over them, announcing he was going to build a ship that he would take them across the ocean before them. They knew Nephi
had never built a ship before, and probably nothing at all as significant as
that, so here they were being forced to trust their lives to a large ship Nephi
was going to build that might sink the minute they get it into the water, or
somewhere out to sea, taking them and their families with them down to a watery
grave. As they said, “Our brother is a
fool, for he thinketh that he can build a ship; yea, and he also thinketh that
he can cross these great waters” (1 Nephi 17:17). How frightening it must
have been to think they would set sail on a ship built by Nephi, who knew
nothing of building a ship, and attempt to cross a vast distance across the
great deep. Nor did they believe Nephi was instructed of the Lord (1 Nephi
17:18).
Without sea trials, the words "good ship"
would have been as meaningless as saying a "good airplane" before
seeing if it could fly.
Yet, after the ship was built, the brothers called
it “good” and “exceedingly fine,” obviously suggesting they had been on it and
seen that it floated, steered, moved about and performed as it should.
This, then, brings us
to:
2. Getting the Ship out of a Bay or Lagoon and into the Open
Sea: There would be no impact of the ocean
currents or waves on the ship as it entered the sea at Khor Rori because of the
twin promontories at the entrance to the inlet.
Top: NASA satellite view of Khor Rori inlet,
which flows toward the sea, and the twin promontories on either side of the
entrance—the sandbar shown did not exist in Lehi's time or for many centuries after that; Bottom: Khor Rori looking out to sea—the two promontories are shown
on either side of the inlet
Normally, the major
difficulty in handling the ship would have been moving from the minimal current
from the inlet (khor) into the ocean current. Part of the problem is the timing of the
current and the tides, which are not always associated with one another. The
current flow of a coastline is usually the result of a complex set of forces.
Contributing factors include tidal current, wind-driven current, prevailing
offshore ocean circulation, river runoff, water depth, and local currents
running parallel and perpendicular to the shoreline caused by the surf. This
coastal flow is also strongly affected by the shape of the coastline, as well
as the region that lies between the surf zone and the shelf.
It is easy to say
that you simply sail a vessel out of the river, inlet, stream or khor, and into the sea; however, the
variable forces involved can be quite dynamic, beginning with needing the tide
in your favor as it recedes past or through these forces enabling a ship to
breach them to gain deep or blue water. As an example, in some cases, it could
be next to impossible to get out of a harbor against an incoming tide,
consequently, most mariners set sail with the tide, especially in ports with
significant tidal currents. So departures would be planned with the outgoing
tide in order to get to the open sea without fighting adverse currents and
using the currents to get out if there was little wind or headwinds.
And here Khor Rori
has a unique feature that creates a breakwater arrangement to offset the
inflowing breakers and make a smooth transition, which is especially true when
the wind is blowing together with the Tide, causing a calm condition and
enabling just about anyone to manage by simply letting the current of the river
flowing into the sea carry them through.
Flanked
on either side by a sweet-water creek, Khor Rori, that ripples like turquoise
silk, it enters the sea between craggy cliffs; at low tide a bar of yellow sand
closes off the mouth. About three centuries after Lehi left here, Omani sailing
dhows fashioned from Malabar hardwood brought ivory from the African coast,
cotton from Egypt and spices from India. They still make such boats north along the
coast at Sur, where Indian workmen chisel the spars by hand and the air is rich
with the scent of freshly planed timber. Omani navigators became as
proficient at plotting a course on the water as they already were in the
desert, with one of the greatest of them, Ahmad Ibn Majid, reputedly provided
Vasco da Gama with an Arab navigational aid in the 15th century, the
astrolabe, and then piloted the Portuguese explorer during his first voyage to
Kolkota
This unique feature,
the two promontory cliff faces on either side of the inlet mouth, block out or
screens the winds and currents at this one critical junction where the Khor
enters the Sea.
Called the Iqita’at Mirbat and the Inqita’at Taqah, these 60-feet to
90-feet high cliffs provide a breakwater at the mouth of the current or inlet
and, like any modern breakwater, void the effect of incoming waves, tide, and
currents, making for a smooth movement of a sailing vessel from the khor or inlet out into the sea.
It should be noted that before
Nephi's family entered his ship for the voyage to the New World, they knew that
the finished ship was "good," and the "workmanship thereof was
exceedingly fine" (1 Nephi 18:4). The wordage here implies that they must
have already been on the ship, like in conducting successful sea trials.
Otherwise, how could they have judged the ship's workmanship unless they saw
that the hull was sound and watertight, that the ship rested properly and
equally balanced in the water, and that the ship handled well in various seas.
How extensive this might have been is unknown, and likely it would not have
taken much to conduct since the Lord was the teacher and Nephi the “captain”
who gave the orders.
Anyone who has ever steered or handled the tiller of a
sailing ship where maneuvering and tacking was not involved can tell you it is
rather boring after a short time. All you do is keep the “wheel” (rudder) in a
particular position and the wind and sea currents do all the work.
In fact, probably the first real
test of their sailing ability was not seen for “many days” until the brothers
rebelled, mutinied and tied the “captain” up (left) and took over the ship. At
this point, because the Liahona stopped working (suggesting it had been working
right along and telling Nephi what to do and what direction to steer the ship, i.e., where to hold the tiller)
and the mutineers panicked (1 Nephi 18:13).
At this point the ship was driven
back, the storm increased, the waters engulfed the vessel and they “were about
to be swallowed up in the depths of the sea” (1 Nephi 18:13).
Between these two points in time,
boarding the ship and the mutiny, there was plenty of time in which everyone could
have become fully acquainted with the ship, cooking, eating, furling sails,
handling rigging, and steering according to the Liahona’s directions and the
words as they appeared from time to time telling them what to do (1 Nephi 16:29).
Going by way of the Southern
Ocean, and following the currents we have discussed numerous times in previous
articles, the activity of the crew would have been minimal. The ship was
“driven forth before the wind,” the occupants had the Liahona to tell them what
to do, and the rest was pretty much a quick trip at the narrowest point of the
globe, covering the least distance possible. Another reason why island-hopping
across the Pacific simply would have been out of the question for the Lehi
party to have managed, especially manipulating the many problems the Malacca
Strait and heading through Indonesia would have caused.
No comments:
Post a Comment