Vitrification of stonework at
Sacsayhuaman complex above Cuzco in Peru
• A shiny, glossy appearance that reflects light like a mirror;
• The presence of a “layer” on the surface of the stone, where the apparent vitrification is visible;
• Evidence of vitrification in places where it would be illogical or simply impossible to achieve a similar level of polish by any other more conventional technique (such as hammering, chiseling or polishing with an abrasive substance such as sand or quartz powder);
• An evident discoloration or change in color and texture of the stone in areas where the vitrification phenomenon is apparent;
• Marks in the stone or other evidence that might suggest that the stone was indeed molten or softened at some point during construction;
• The sockets where metal clamps would have been inserted to join together adjacent blocks of stone are often visible in stones that bear traces of vitrification (with the sockets or T-Grooves also showing signs of vitrification)
The vitrified stonework in the vestiges of Peru are stones that have been melted to a point where the molecular modification caused by high temperatures (over 1900ºF) changes the stone’s natural texture and produces a skin or surface layer providing a metallic sheen, which gives the stone strength and precision.
The shiny surface and molded forms are
easy to see in these various stoneworks at Sacsayhuaman
Left: A later wall requiring
restoration because of its constant deterioration of the stone; Right: Stone
that had gone through the vitrification process when originally constructed,
though older, still requires no restoration at all
Now, the Vitrified Surface of the stone shows a very different spectrum of elements to the limestone body. The glaring difference is that Silicon is the predominant component with much higher concentrations. The trace elements of Aluminum and Magnesium are also significantly higher than the body of the stone. Oxygen is also present in double the quantities found in the body. The quantities of Calcium and Carbon are much lower than the body sample. The Silicon, Aluminium and Magnesium indicate that a material was added to the surface of the stone. The oxygen may have been part of this matter or it may have been introduced as part of oxidation during an aerobic heating process. This could have been during the formation of silicate, SiO2.
Left:
Shine shows the vitrified stonework; Right: Cross section shows the vitrified
stone as the top layer and the normal limestone beneath (the indentation is for
a connector, probably brass, poured into the openings to seal the two stones
together)
In addition to the stone itself, the stonework is also of great interest. As an example, inside the Coricancha (Qorikancha, Korikancha, Qurikancha, or Quri Kancha—the ancient opulent gold Peruvian temple beneath the Spanish Santa Domingo Cathedral built on top of the partially destroyed ancient site in the 16th century) in Cuzco, below Sacsayhuaman, stones and niches bear traces of perfectly drilled holes and grooves whose purposes is unknown (it has been speculated they might have held golden plaques, doors, hinges or other ornaments). Some of the holes were drilled in the hard granite for a depth in some cases exceeding 20 inches and with a diameter of up to 1½ to 2 inches.
An interesting niche inside the
Qorikancha, with remarkably drilled holes and unresolved grooves whose
purpose is unknown today
Drilled holes in stone showing both
the precision and the tool marks inside the holes (light is a flashlight at the
other end
I'm fascinated by these drill holes. My expertise as a geologist is drilling. It is obvious they had the technology or actual drilling equipment to drill these holes. They certainly did have the wheel. These holes weren't chiseled - they were drilled. Jarom 1:8 says they had machinery. No question about it looking at these photos.
ReplyDeleteDoes the similar stonework in ancient Egypt have the same vitrified surface as the ones in South America?
ReplyDeleteI don't know of any, certainly on the large constructions. However, many of the large constructions originally had a layer of other material completely covering it. Also, I believe that a study of some of the large blocks (not all!) show evidence of being formed in place (ie. bubbles within the block being more prevalent towards the top than the bottom). The type of stone the Egyptians worked with was generally quite different from what was used in South America.
DeleteMy understanding is some of the Egyptian pyramids were built of limestone. The obelisks were igneous rock. South America had both just like the Egyptians. Looks to me that the Nephites were more advanced in their technology than the Egyptians. Which would make sense because they were of the House of Israel and were taught the things of God.
DeleteHave this holes here in Florianópolis, Brazil, too...
ReplyDelete