Continuing from the previous
post regarding this event and what can be learned from it, and here picking up
with the sixth of the five journal entries:
In 1842, two years before Joseph
Smith’s death, Willard Richards (left)
compiled a number of records in order to produce a history of the
church. Among the records examined were the various accounts related to Zelph.
In the process of combining the accounts, Richards crossed out Woodruff's
references to "hill Cumorah," and Heber C. Kimball's reference to the
"last" great struggle with the Lamanites. We should keep in mind that
it is not likely that Willard Richards, who served as Second Counselor in the
First Presidency under Brigham Young, served a mission to the eastern U.S. and
also to Great Britain, was ordained an Apostle in 1840, and in 1842 was called
to be the Church Historian and Recorder, and as such, wrote a total of 1,884
pages on the history of Joseph Smith, which B.H. Roberts later incorporated
into the “History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,” and Richards
was also in Carthage Jail with Joseph, Hyrum and John Taylor, and the only one
unhurt during the attack that killed Joseph Smith—it is hardly likely that a
man of his stature, position, and trust would have just arbitrarily crossed out
two extremely important entries, i.e., the hill Cumorah, and last great battle”
unless given the reason by his leaders to do so.
Willard Richards was the only one, as the prophet foretold,
not injured or killed in Carthage Jail, supervised the removal of Taylor and
the bodies of Joseph and Hyrum. His first-hand account of the event was
published in the “Times and Seasons” (Vol.5, No.14, (1. Aug. 1844),
titled, "Two Minutes in Jail."
As Church Historian, it was his
responsibility to “keep an accurate and comprehensive record of the church and
its activities. His office gathers history sources and preserves records, ordinances,
minutes, revelations, procedures, and other documents. The Church Historian and
Recorder also chairs the Historic Sites Committee and Records Management
Committee, and may act as an authoritative voice of the church in historical
matters.” And also “This office is based on revelations to Joseph Smith calling
for keeping records and preparing a church history.
The point is, Elder Kimball and Elder
Woodruff were not speaking or writing as prophets. They were simply recording
what they understood from the comments made by Joseph Smith. While we do not
know what Joseph actually said, several people who wrote in their journals at
the time had differing views on that subject. As an example, White Lamanite
(LH, RM). And no one other than Kimball and Woodruff made any connection with
the Hill Cumorah. Now, were Kimball and Woodruff inspired to know and
understand that the distance Joseph Smith stated was from the Hill Cumorah, and
the others uninspired to know that it was the East Coast?
As stated earlier, six men wrote of the incident in their
journals. Three of which later became prophets, and only one of those—the only
one—used the term “Hill Cumorah,” and he did so with a following explanation
“or East Sea.”
The six men who wrote diary
accounts concerning Zelph were: (1) George A. Smith, (2) Wilford Woodruff, (3) Heber
C. Kimball, (4) Moses Martin, (5) Reuben McBride, and (6) Levi Hancock, which
is the order of their statements as found in the first post in this series
#1-6).
To recap some oddities:
George Albert Smith made no mention
of the Hill Cumorah, east coast or Rocky Mountains.
Woodrow Woodruff is the only one that commented about the Hill
Cumorah in which he said: “…under
the great prophet Onandagus that was known from the hill Camorah or east sea to
the Rocky mountains…”
Heber C. Kimball wrote: “…
he had been an officer who fell in battle, in the last destruction among the
Lamanites, and his name was Zelph.” He made no mention of the Hill Cumorah, east coast or Rocky Mountains,
nor did he mentioned a last battle between Lamanites and Nephites.
Moses Martin, wrote: “this man [Zelph] was
once a mighty Prophet and many other things concerning his people.” No mention
is made of the Hill Cumorah, east coast or Rocky Mountains, or last great
battle.
Reuben McBride wrote: “his
name was Zelph a great warrior under the Prophet Omandagus… he was a
white Lamanite was known from the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountains.” No mention
of the Hill Cumorah is made.
Levi Hancock (left) wrote: “the
last man buried was Zelf, he was a white Lamanite who fought with the people of
Onendagus for freedom…” No mention is made of the Hill Cumorah, east coast or
Rocky Mountains.
One
of the problems always with journals is a person normally writes in it after
the fact. In this case, there were three different dates of the event listed by
six men: George Albert Smith dated the event on Monday, June 2; Joseph Smith,
Heber C. Kimball, and Reuben McBride listed it as Tuesday, June 3, and Wilford Woodrow
stated it was May-June. It should also be noted that Wilford Woodruff actually
had three dates for his entries on this matter, the last one in 1893, which
would be 59 years later.
It should also be noted that stating there is a North
American location for some Lamanite events does not exclude the possibility of
Book of Mormon events having occurred elsewhere. As a matter of fact, it
supports the conclusions that the Nephite people first settled in the Andean
area of South America at a time when the eastern lands were under water and
were not raised until the Andes came up at the time of Christ’s death, that
just before that event many Nephites and converted Lamanites sailed north in
Hagoth’s ships and settled in Central America where their buildings and achievements
rivaled those of the Andean settlements, and from there other Lamanites and
Nephites eventually migrated into North America, where their inner fighting and
wars are attested to in the finding of the Zelph burial.
Finally,
we might again suggest that while journals are a fine thing and we are all grateful
for those who kept journals and provide us with some insight into the period
and the events of the early Church, we need to use a little intelligence in
accepting everything that was written, even by Church leaders, who relied on
their memory to record, especially later, what they saw and heard. And it is
even more difficult when we take these ancient records out of context in order
to make them agree with our point of view and theory.
The
facts are, we know there was a white Lamanite named Zelph, a thickset man in
build, who was killed by an arrow and buried in a mound in Illinois in some
ancient time. We know he lived when a famous man named Onandagus lived.
Anything else we are adding to what Joseph Smith is credited as saying.
It is almost certain that there were Nephites and Lamanites in Central and North America that were descendants of those that came on Hagoth's ships around the same time period as the battle of Cumorah; and these two people --with a long history of being enemies-- also began fighting.
ReplyDeleteThus battles in Central and later North America could have continued after Cumorah, and thus would be the final battles of the Lamanites and Nephites even though we do not have a record of them.
So even the statement that Zelph died in the last great struggle between the Nephites and Lamanites does not necessarily disagree with the Andes model.
Great point
ReplyDelete