data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8ced/b8cedd4708a7cab8e2de66538a53de441c70604c" alt=""
Consider an English person writing the word “sea” in Spanish—you would have a choice of three words: mar (which means a lot, lots of, no end of, sea), marino (which can mean marine, sailor, sea, seaman), marytimo (which can mean marine, maritime, sea, seaside). Ocean can be oceano, oceanya (which means a large, spatial body of water). Lake, which in English is a body of usually fresh water surrounded by land, does not necessarily have the same meaning in Spanish—laca (which means hair spray, lacquer, lake, shellac), or lago, which means loch, which is an arm of the sea similar to a fjord—a long narrow inlet of the ocean that is nearly landlocked.
The point is, when translating from one language into another, it is almost always a difficult process in trying to find the right word to denote the right meaning. When the Nephites wrote in Reformed Egyptian, they were using characters (meanings) that were not as familiar to them as their native language of Hebrew, therefore, they had to choose words that conveyed the meaning they wanted. Because “yam” in Hebrew meant “the water (Mediterranean) behind them when facing east” does not mean they chose a Reformed Egyptian character for sea which had the exact same ancient connotation—but, in fact, conveyed the meaning of sea or ocean. When Joseph Smith translated the Reformed Egyptian character for “sea,” he concluded that it meant ocean (which is what sea meant in his time) and the spirit told him that was correct. Thus, they entered their ship on the shores of Irreantum (many waters) and were “driven forth before the wind to the promised land” where they landed southward along the Sea West where Mormon tells us the land of first inheritance (landing site) was located.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57eb6/57eb6f8a69b2f8f3c120c8c32a7f64169e0808bf" alt=""
In fact, Nephi tells us he did not teach Jewish customs to his people at all, other than the law of Moses, which they lived as they looked forward to the coming of the Christ (Alma 26:15), and after his appearance to them, they no longer lived that law (4 Nephi 1:12). It is doubtful the Nephites knew much about the Jews, “for I, Nephi, have not taught them many things concerning the manner of the Jews” (2 Nephi 25:2, 6)—and they would not have known the rationale of the Jews regarding why they named directions by certain words. In Alma 11:4, we are told that the Nephites “did not reckon after the manner of the Jews,” neither “did they measure after the manner of the Jews,” but, in fact, “they altered their reckoning and their measuree, according to the minds and the circumstances of the people, in every generation, until the reign of the judges.” That is, from Nephi down to Mosiah, the Nephites “according to their minds” determined value by their own reckoning—not until Mosiah was a standard set, which is outlined in Alma 11:5-19. The point is, the Nephites did not use the Hebrew system in place in Jerusalem when Lehi left there. They established their own. So why would they use ancient and unuseful definitions for directions as so many Theorists claim to try and disorient the scriptural account of north and south with that of Mesoamerica being east and west.
It seems disingenuous to claim ancient Hebrew word meanings were couched in their usage of the Reformed Egyptian, which is all we have of the Nephite record as translated by Joseph Smith. Certainly, Joseph Smith knew north, east, south, and west, and when he worked out the translation of one of these words, and it was verified by the spirit, then the translation would be correct as we would understand it today.
(See the next post The Word Sea—What Did it Mean? to gain a better understanding of the use of this word in the Book of Mormon—it did not mean what Theorists claim)
No comments:
Post a Comment