The continental shelf is the
extended perimeter of a continent and associated coastal plain. Much of the
shelf was exposed during earlier periods, but is now submerged under relatively
shallow seas that are known as shelf seas and gulfs, and likely submerged
anciently.
A continental shelf is not seen above sea level, and is unknown to those who do not study
oceanography, except in principle; however, the shelf is actually part of the
continent and in the case of South America’s east coast, is rather extensive
Most continents are determined
by the range of the shelf about them, and some continents have little or no
shelf at all, particularly where the forward edge of an advancing oceanic plate
dives beneath the continental crust in an offshore subduction zone, creating a deep trough such as off
the west coast of Chile. The average width of a shelf is about 50 miles, and
though the depth of a shelf varies, it is generally shallower than 500 feet.
The slope of the shelf is usually quite low, and is basically the flooded margins
of the continent. Most of the coasts about the Atlantic have wide and shallow
shelves, made of thick sedimentary wedges, and ends at a point of increasing
slope called the shelf break, and the sea floor below the break is the
continental slope, followed the continental rise which finally merges into the
deep ocean floor, or abyssal plain.
Plate Movement is shown here with the Nazca Plate (left) running into
the South American Plate (right) along the Peruvian coast. This action takes
place from Colombia to the southern tip of Chile, as the Nazca Plate subducts
beneath (and lifting) the South American Plate
Because of the spreading,
contracting, subducting, slipping, etc., of tectonic plates, entire continents
move—today at a very slow rate, only a few millimeters a year; however, at
certain times in the history of the planet, they have moved much faster as is
evidenced by the division of the earth in Peleg’s time (about 2100 B.C.) and
the sudden rise of mountains, “whose height is great” indicated by Samuel the
Lamanite regarding the crucifixions of the Savior (about 33 A.D.) Geologists,
of course, do not accept such quick movement, but we know that it has and did occur
suddenly as it is written. In addition, we also know that when the flood waters
retracted, they did so suddenly, moving huge amounts of earth and creating
large canyons, gorges, breaks, valleys, etc.
As
can be seen by this diagram, when a tectonic plate (in this case, the Nazca
Plate) dives beneath another plate (South American Plate), the latter is lifted
upward since it has nowhere else to go
Scientists also tell us that
tectonic plates dive under one another, lifting the other, sometimes great
distances. This creates folds in the earth’s surface, mountains, and deep
channels in the seabed. All of this, of course, alters the visible land that is
seen above the surface, as well as that beneath.
The Falkland Plateau, which is located
on a projection of the Patagonian continental shelf, would extend the area of
Patagonia eastward about 750 miles from Rio Gallegos in Argentina, lifting the
plate clear to the South George and South Sandwich Islands a thousand miles
beyond the Falklands
In the southeastern area of
South America, off the coast of Argentina, is the Falkland Plateau mentioned in
the last post. This plateau, or extension of the continental shelf, reaches as
far as the Falkland Islands (750 miles to the east, and also under other terms,
to the South Georgia Island and even the South Sandwich Islands about 1000
miles further east. That is to say, if the continental shelf around the
Falklands were to rise, which could happen from further subducting of the Nazca
Plate beneath the South American Plate, the continent of South America would
look something like a backward “S” rather than the shape we know.
This is far more likely than one might think due to the shallow depth of the basins surrounding the Falkland Islands. These three basins, if the Plateau were to rise as part of the continental shelf, would bring to the surface volcanic peaks in the west, a mountain range to the south, and an inner sea between the North Scotia Ridge and the current Falkland Islands area, with highlands at the north.
This is far more likely than one might think due to the shallow depth of the basins surrounding the Falkland Islands. These three basins, if the Plateau were to rise as part of the continental shelf, would bring to the surface volcanic peaks in the west, a mountain range to the south, and an inner sea between the North Scotia Ridge and the current Falkland Islands area, with highlands at the north.
Falkland Basins are bounded to the
west by the Falklands Platform, to the north by a steeply sloping feature
termed the Falkland Escarpment, to the east by the Maurice Ewing Bank and to
the south by the Scotia/South American plate boundary, which produces a
topographic feature known as the Scotia Ridge, which includes shallow water areas
such as the Burdwood Bank (immediately south of the Falklands), as well as the
islands of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Whether or not such an event
should occur is unknown, though some scientists believe it might, at least at
some given time in the future. The point is that such movement upward of the
continental shelf has occurred in the past, tilting the entire eastern coast of
South America, to bring above sea level not only the Amazon Basin, but the
several other draining basins shown in the last post.
The problem is, it is a simple
matter for someone to write that South America was never under water, or that
the west coastal area, what is now called the Andean area, was the only basic
land above water, and scoff at the idea that the Land of Promise might have
been in South America; however, the facts of the matter are that the continent
of South America east of the Andes, even today, is barely above sea level. The
entire Amazon Basin lies between 400 feet above to actual sea level over a 2.7
million square mile area. Stated differently, when combined with a few other
contiguous basins, an area much larger than the United States, smaller only
than Russia, even today sits right at or near sea level on the continent of South America.
How can it be said that it was
always this way when hundreds of scientists studying the continent have
declared without a doubt that much of South America was once submerged?
(See the next post, “The Rising
of South America—Part VII—The Eastern Highlands,” to see the view of Guiana and
Brazil left after the sea withdrew from off the continent)
No comments:
Post a Comment