Another look at Book of Mormon
Archaeological Forum (BMAF) website tells us that their interpretation of Alma
22 is far from accurate. However, in an introduction they write an interesting
precedent for understanding the Book of Mormon, which relates back to the last
post regarding Hender’s two Bountifuls.
BMAF writes: “Why is redundancy in geographic reference
association so important? Because redundancy eliminates confusion…”
It is interesting when we
apply this very accurate statement to Hender’s point in the previous posts about
where Lehi landed. In doing so, we find that an obscure comment by Neal A.
Maxwell in a Conference talk (“Lessons from
Laman and Lemuel,” Oct 1999) regarding Laman and Lemuel
unwilling or unable to rise to the level of their birthright in both the Old
World Bountiful and also in the Land of Promise, which, as a subject connector,
Elder Maxwell also called Bountiful (“From Bountiful to Bountiful”), to show
that in both worlds, Laman and Lemuel “became
rebels instead of leaders.” Hender took this small comment about Lehi
landing in Bountiful and built an entire concept around it that Lehi landed in
the northern part of the Land Southward, in what became later known as
Bountiful, then traveled south to the area of what became known as the Land of
Nephi. As BMAF concludes, “one single
reference should never be used to establish a critical correlation..” But
from there, they go off point and state: “Take
the idea of an isthmus, for instance. Only one single reference in the book’s
text, Alma 22:32, can be interpreted as an isthmus explanation yet numerous
current and historic geographies of the Book of Mormon pivot around this
concept.”
It is true that
Mesoamericanists’ models of the Land of Promise pivot around this area called
the Isthmus of Tehuantepec; however, the term “isthmus” is never used in the
scriptural record, though Joseph Smith would have been familiar with that word.
The problem is, a narrow neck of land can be called an isthmus in our present
language; however, in 370 A.D., the term would not have been known and,
perhaps, “small neck” translates to the same thing—but this is simply not known
to us. The point is, however, that when we start using words that are not in the
scriptural record to describe a different term used, we run into difficulty. And
the only reason that Mesoamericanists use Isthmus is because they want to
associated their so-called narrow neck to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, which is
neither narrow nor small as Mormon writes.
• “…there
being a small neck of land between the land northward and the land southward“
(Alma 22:32);
• “…by the narrow pass which led by the sea into the
land northward, yea, by the sea, on the west and on the east” (Alma 50:34);
• “…secure
the narrow pass which led into the land northward” (Alma 52:9);
• “…by
the narrow neck which led into the land northward” (Alma 63:5);
• “…even
to the narrow passage which led into the land southward” (Mormon 2:29);
• “…by
the narrow pass which led into the land southward” (Mormon 3:5);
• “…by
the narrow neck of land, by the place where the sea divides the land”
(Ether 10:20)
The Isthmus of Tehuantepec on this NASA satellite photo is barely
discernable—one can only imagine how anyone in Nephite times would have
considered it a “narrow neck” or “small neck” of land
This illustrates the problem when
someone inserts a word to replace another explanation. Once calling the narrow
neck an Isthmus, it then allows the giant leap to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec
(which, of course, is called an isthmus—but certainly no one would ever relate
the terms “small neck” or “narrow neck” to it), and having done so, the other
correlating statements no longer apply, since a narrow pass or passage through
Tehuantepec, 144 miles by foot across, simply could not be defensible and allow
someone to cut off another group trying to get through to the north. This then
leads others to think of the narrow pass and narrow passage as separate and
disconnected locations, even though all of them relate to the single factor of
connecting the Land Southward to the Land Northward, which Mormon also
describes the former as nearly surrounded by water except for this small neck
of land (Alma 22:32)—which agrees with Jacob’s description in 2 Nephi 10:20) and
shows that it was the only land connection between these two large land masses
of the Land of Promise.
Again, BMAF goes far afield when they
add, “If a variety of similar reinforcing references
concerning an isthmus should actually exist, than everyone writing their
geographies around this core concept would be standing on bedrock. Since there
is no redundancy, these writers are standing on sand when they rely on the term
“isthmus” as a correct interpretation of Alma 22:32.”
In the 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language,
Webster defines isthmus as: “A neck
or narrow slip of land by which two continents are connected, or why which a
peninsula is united to the mainland…the word is applied to land of considerable
extent, between seas, as the isthmus of Darien, which connects North and South
America.”
As one can see, the term in Joseph Smith’s time referred to as an
extensive amount of land. Today’s definition, on the other hand, is more
aligned with Mormon’s usage and is defined as: “A narrow strip of
land with sea on either side, forming a link between two larger areas of land,”
which is exactly what Mormon wrote.
However, the important thing here is Webster’s
1828 definition from Joseph Smith’s time. But setting that aside, we can take
the more modern definition and point out that the key word here is “narrow.”
And to make sure we understand how narrow this small, narrow neck was, Mormon
adds: “And now, it was only the distance
of a day and a half's journey for a Nephite, on the line Bountiful and the land
Desolation, from the east to the west sea” (Alma 22:32)—a day and a half
journey. This is not for a Lamanite, for some special individual, record-breaking
run, world-setting pace, Book of Guiness rarity, marathon runner, or some
remarkable individual or group, but a typical Nephite, or in our day, a typical
man.
So we have several references to a
small, narrow neck of land that separates the Land Northward from the Land
Southward, where the sea encroaches on either side, perhaps like a bay or some
type of inlet and “divides the land,” where a narrow pass or passage extends
through the land providing movement between the two major land divisions. There
are at least seven references to this location, of which, in 1829, the word
Isthmus would not apply.
Consequently, from all of
this, we find that Mormon’s narrow neck was a strip of land, perhaps 20-30
miles long (north to south) and 25-30 miles wide (east to west). While we do
not have a measurement or comment from Mormon to its length, he informs us that
overall it was “small” (Alma 22:32), and the width was “narrow” enough for a
man to cover in a day and a half, which makes that distance about 25-30 miles, and to make it "small" the length would probably be a similar distance.
(See the next post, “What Was the Shape and Size of Mormon's Small Neck of Land? – Part II,” for more information on this narrow neck of land that separated
the Land Northward from the Land Southward “where the sea divides the land.")
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment