Continuing with the
Theory that the Great Lakes area is the Land of Promise and the question, "If
Lehi landed in that area, how did he get there?" In the first two posts, we
showed once again that the St. Lawrence and Mississippi rivers were not the
avenue Lehi could have taken with his deep-sea vessel that Nephi built as some
Theorists claim, and also he could not have sailed up the largest eastern sea,
the Susquehanna. In this post, we will look at other possibilities of sailing
along the inland waterway system of the Eastern U.S. as other Theorists claim.
Red Arrow: Mouth of the Potomac River;
Yellow Arrow: Chesapeake Bay; Green Arrow: Washington D.C.; Orange Arrow: Great
Falls (series of rapids); Blue Arrow: Shenandoah River
Another large eastern river
is the Potomac, whose mouth also empties into the Chesapeake Bay. The Potomac
is the 4th largest river along the Atlantic coast, is 405 miles long
(including the main stem and North Branch), and beyond Washington D.C. is quite
shallow. From the mouth of the Potomac River, where it empties into the
Chesapeake Bay to Hains Point in southwest Washington D.C. (near the Jefferson
Memorial), a distance of about 103 miles, the river is 48 feet deep, but from
there further upriver, the depth drops dramatically.
As an example, the normal
water level at Little Falls, just upriver from Washington is 2.9 feet; it is
0.7 feet at Point of Rocks, 1.7 feet at Shepherdstown, 2.5 feet at Hancock, and
3.0 feet at Paw Paw. In addition, from Bear Island to Olmsted Island the river
is strewn with large and small islands and narrow channels that are extremely
shallow and full of rocks, creating several falls, or rapids, where only canoes
and kayaks can negotiate. In fact, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources
issues bulletins when it is not even safe on the river in a kayak except for
very experienced individuals and teams.
Aerial views of obstructions on the Potomac River. Top Left:
Turkey Island; Top Right: Great Falls; Bottom Left: Little Falls; Bottom Right: Stubblefield Falls.
All of these areas are within 10-15 miles of Washington D.C., about 115 miles
from the mouth of the Potomac River
From the Atlantic
Ocean into Chesapeake Bay, which has an average depth of 21 feet (200 feet in some isolated
areas, though a 6’ tall person could wade through more than 700,000 acres of
the Bay and never get their hat wet), to Washington D.C., deep-sea sailing
ships and ocean-going vessels have always been able to navigate. However,
because of numerous rapids, falls and shallow depths, the Potomac above
Washington has always been unnavigable.
As an example,
according to National Weather Service, the Potomac at Harper’s Ferry and
the confluence with the Shenandoah River, 62 miles upriver from Washington
D.C., is only four feet in depth; only 18 miles upriver from Washington is
the area known as The Great Falls of the Potomac River, an unnavigable area that blocked
all types of shipping beyond that point.
The Great Falls of the Potomac River have
always been unnavigable by any type of boat or ship. Even kayaking through here
is considered extremely dangerous
In 1785, George
Washington had the "Patowmack Canal" started that eventually connected the
Tidewater region near Georgetown with Cumberland, Maryland. Finished in 1802,
the canal allowed freight to be transported by shipping around the rapids for
the first time. Obviously, there is no possibility that Lehi sailed up the
Potomac in Nephi’s ship that crossed the Great Deep. For those who claim Lehi
went up any of the eastern inland waterways is simply a fallacious or ignorant
argument since all these waterways in the east that might point toward the
Great Lakes area are shallow and rarely are navigable beyond a hundred miles
inland, leaving Lehi having to travel several hundred miles overland to the
area that the Great Lakes Theorists claim is the Land of Promise--which is not supported by the scriptural record.
The inland water
system of the Eastern United States, when viewed on a map (left) certainly
looks possible for Lehi to have sailed to the Great Lakes or very near them. However, and it is a big "however," maps are deceiving because they tell nothing about the actual waterway,
river, or stream. As an example, sailing ships had to have sufficient “depth
under the keel”—today referred to as UKC: under-keel clearance available
between the deepest point of the vessel and the seabed/riverbed in still water.
This is always a little more because of pitch and roll of the ship and the
movement up and down in waves. In fact, this increases in severe weather or
other abnormal conditions, and the POLA/POLB advises ship Masters and pilots to
use prudent seamanship at all times when piloting vessels in the harbors and
approaches. This is extremely important when moving up and down rivers in order
not to run aground--one can only image how difficult it would have been for Lehi to have negotiated any river and its approach, had he tried to sail up a river.
In addition, many of
these inland water ways, part of the river commerce system of the United
States, have been man-made, i.e., canals, channels, and waterways that have
been dug, such as the Erie Canal; connected, such as the canal connecting the
Ohio to Lake Michigan; extended, such as the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from Key West Florida, to Norfolk, Virginia; dredged, such as the Mississippi, Ohio, and others, in order to allow commerce and
travel today. Many have locks, which raise the water level to accommodate
shipping, such as the Ohio, Upper Mississippi, Illinois and Tennessee rivers.
Many others are only deep
enough for barges that haul freight, but not an ocean going vessel that
requires depth for its deeper hull. As an example, barges are an extremely
efficient mode of transportation, moving about 22,500 tons of cargo as a single
unit. A single 15-barge tow is equivalent to about 225 railroad cars or 870
tractor-trailer trucks. If the cargo transported on the inland waterways each
year had to be moved by another mode, it would take an additional 6.3 million
rail cars or 25.2 million trucks to carry the load. So the waterways have been
dug, extended, formed or altered to make them navigable, beginning in the 1800s.
Digging canals was back-breaking work in the 19th century, and took several years to complete
Obviously, this
inland waterway which modern man accepts without thought, did not exist in its
present configuration and length in 600 B.C., or even before the 19th-century.
What is often not
understood is that historical events did not always happen the way we think or
according to our interpretation of the facts. As an example, as has been
reported here many times, the early trade routes from India to and through
Indonesia to China, etc., which Sorenson and others have used to claim Lehi sailed through Indonesia to the Pacific in the same manner, did not take place in deep sea, ocean-going ships,
but in shallow-bottomed, weak-hulled coastal boats that sailed close to shore
and were put in at night, for storms, or in bad weather since their vessels
were not strong enough to handle the constant pounding of the deep sea, strong
waves and the pressure of much canvas on masts (despite what is shown in
Hollywood movies). As an example, the basically calm waters of the Mediterranean Sea upon which the Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, and Phoenicians sailed, is far different from the heavy pounding sea upon which the later explorers of the 15th century onward sailed. One cannot judge the one example with the other--that is like comparing apples and grapes.
In addition, what is
not seen on a map that appears to provide a course from one point to another,
is the obstructions that hinder passage or block it all together along rivers
and waterways, making it impossible to sail where the finger on a map can go.
And finally, ships of today can go places and handle difficulties that no ship
of the past could have done—in 600 B.C., there were no compasses, maps, GPS,
radar, sonar, radio, etc. When Lehi set sail, he was on his own across
thousands of miles of ocean. He went where the wind blew him and the ocean
currents took him, and sailing up any river under such circumstances would be
highly unlikely when you consider that the currents flow downriver and the
winds along rivers are fickle at best because of the surrounding terrain.
Top: The eastern inland rivers are
frequently blocked by falls, rapids, islands and very shallow depths. Top:
Where the falls begin just above Washington D.C. on the Potomac River; Bottom
Left: Swainson Island near Cabin John, and Bottom Right: Gladys Island, just
past Riverbend and just beyond Bealls Island about 12 miles upriver from
Washington D.C. Note the impassability of any vessel up this river
The point is, as has
been shown in these past three posts, the inland waterway system of the Eastern
United States would simply not be a viable method of getting Nephi’s ship from
the ocean to an inland area, such as the Great Lakes. It has to be kept in mind
that a theory that looks good on paper (map in this case) is not necessarily
workable in the real world.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thank you for posting such a great blog. I found your website perfect for my needs. Read About Atlantic intracoastal waterway
ReplyDelete