Pastoral life, outside the city,
would have been both physically taxing and mentally relaxing. It is doubtful
that a young teen would have been interested in or knowledgeable about what was
going on politically in the city
Nor would a teen likely have been aware much that his father “went forth praying with all his heart in behalf of his people” (1 Nephi 1:5). Nor would he have known much about “a pillar of fire and dwelt upon a rock before him; and he saw and heard much; and because of the things which he saw and heard he did quake and tremble exceedingly” (1 Nephi 1:6). After all, teenagers are not generally that aware of anything their fathers are doing that does not related directly to themselves.
Now, it could be argued that by the time Nephi engraved this information on the Small Plates (30 years after the events), he had read his father’s record on the Large Plates and was well aware of those early events. He does include in his own record the words “And now I, Nephi, do not make a full account of the things which my father hath written, for he hath written many things which he saw in visions and in dreams; and he also hath written many things which he prophesied and spake unto his children, of which I shall not make a full account” (1 Nephi 1:16).
Thus, the entire first chapter of Nephi’s record on the Small Plates might well have come from Lehi’s record on the Large Plates. This is additionally shown in the next statement by Nephi: “But I shall make an account of my proceedings in my days. Behold, I make an abridgment of the record of my father, upon plates which I have made with mine own hands; wherefore, after I have abridged the record of my father then will I make an account of mine own life” (1 Nephi 1:16).
In
the first year of Zedekiah’s reign as king of Judah, the Lord told Lehi to leave
his home at Jerusalem and flee into the wilderness
It has been suggested by some historians that Lehi was born about 640 B.C., which would have made him 43 years old at the time he left Jerusalem in 597 B.C. If that were the case, and taking the marriage ages of the time, Lehi would have married around the age of 30, which would be about 610 B.C. (an odd age factor to our modern thinking, but necessary in that time since young men were apprenticed to their father’s to learn and develop a career, and did not marry until they had achieved the ability to support a wife through that work).
Thus, using those ages for Lehi, we can see that Laman, the oldest son, would have been about 13 years old in 597 B.C. Obviously, that would not have been the case. Even if Lehi was born in 650 B.C., as some claim, that would have made Laman 23 years old, Lemuel 21, Sam 19, and Nephi 17.
Now, the marrying age of women during this time was about 15, suggesting the earliest to have children would be when Sariah was 16 years of age (a difficult concept to our modern way of thinking, but none-the-less the facts of ancient Israel). That means she would have been 22 years old at the birth of Nephi, having been born about 635 B.C., 15 in 620 B.C., and 22 in 613 B.C. at the birth of Nephi.
However, Apostle Erastus Snow said that “The Prophet Joseph Smith informed us that the record of Lehi was contained on the 116 pages that were first translated and subsequently stolen, and of which an abridgment is given us in the First Book of Nephi, which is the record of Nephi individually, he himself being of the lineage of Manasseh; but that Ishmael was of the lineage of Ephraim, and that his sons married into Lehi's family, and Lehi's sons married Ishmael's daughters” (Journal of Discourses, Vol 23, p184, emphasis added; Improvement Era 55, September 1952, pp642, 694; Answers to Book of Mormon Questions, Bookcraft, Salt Lake City, 1967, pp9-11).
This means that Lehi had two daughters older than Laman, making Laman only 19 years old, Lemuel 17, Sam 15, Nephi 13 when they left Jerusalem if Lehi was born in 650 B.C. Again, an obviously juvenile age for Nephi.
Consequently, we need to extend Lehi’s birth date back to at least 660 B.C., which would mean that when they left Jerusalem, Lehi’s daughters were 32 and 30 years of age, would have allowed them to have families as Nephi states (1 Nephi 7:6).
In this case, then, Lehi would have been 63 years old in 597 B.C., the year he left Jerusalem, 71 years old when they reached Bountiful after spending eight years in the wilderness (1 Nephi 17:4-5), about 73 during the sea voyage from Bountiful to the Land of Promise. This older age would agree more with Nephi’s statement about Lehi’s age when he stated: “and my parents being stricken in years, and having suffered much grief because of their children, they were brought down, yea, even upon their sick-beds” (1 Nephi 18:17), than if he was only in his early 60s or 50s, as some theorists claim about Nephi’s age would make him. Such an advanced age also makes more sense that Lehi died about two years after reaching the Land of Promise (2 Nephi 4:12).
It is thought by some that the two sisters that Nephi mentions (2 Nephi 5:6) were the two older sisters that married the sons of Ishmael, which means that when Nephi separated from his brothers, these wives of the sons of Ishmael left their husbands and went with Nephi. However, under ancient Hebrew/Israel law as stated in the Bible, popularly called “ketubah” or marriage contract (considered an integral part of a traditional Jewish marriage, and outlines the rights and responsibilities of the groom, in relation to the bride), it was almost impossible for a woman to get a divorce, and the women, when married, moved to the husband’s home and family, and was thereafter part of that home and family, and it was extremely uncommon for the women to return to her own father’s home.
Thus, it would seem unlikely that these two sisters were the two that married Ishmael’s sons, had families by them, and would have been married for at least 15 years or more. This means, then, that these “sisters” who followed Nephi and “those who went with him,” including Sam, Jacob, Joseph and Zoram, would have been two other daughters of Lehi, that had gone unmentioned in the scriptural record by Nephi until this point in time.
Thus, if Lehi was born in 660 B.C., his life might be stated in years as:
660 BC – Lehi born at Jerusalem, presumably in the family home outside the city;
630 BC – married Sariah;
629 BC – first daughter born
627 BC – second daughter born
625 BC – Laman born
623 BC – Lemuel born
621 BC – Sam born
619 BC – Nephi born
597 BC – Nephi 22 years old; Zedekiah made king; prophets preach in Jerusalem; Lehi preaches in Jerusalem and told to take family into wilderness; leaves his home and heads toward the Red Sea;
596 BC – Lehi sends sons back to Jerusalem to get Brass Plates; sends them back again to get Ishmael and his family;
595 BC – Lehi’s sons marry Ishmael’s daughters; finds Liahona; leaves Valley of Lemuel with combined families and heads down the Red Sea;
594-589 BC – Jacob and Joseph born in wilderness;
589 BC – Lehi reaches seashore and calls the area Bountiful and the ocean the Irreantum Sea;
589-588 BC – Nephi builds his ship;
587 BC – Lehi preaches to his sons; Lehi dies;
586 BC – Nephi leaves brothers and area of First Landing with “all those who would go with him; reaches area they called Nephi and settles down and builds the City of Nephi. This is the same year that Zedekiah’s reign as king ends, his sons are captured and killed before him and he is blinded and taken captive by Nebuchadnezzar; Mulek escapes Jerusalem (Omni 1:15) and is led by the Lord to the Land of Promise where he settles in the land later called Zarahemla (Omni 1:16).
(See the next post, “Importance of the Ages of Lehi’s Family – Part II,” for more about the age of Nephi, both when he left Jerusalem and when he arrived in the Land of Promise, and its importance in better understanding the scriptural record and these events)
NEPHI WAS JUST A KID WHEN HE LEFT JERUSALEM.
ReplyDeleteI do not agree that Nephi was more than 20 years old. In fact I do not agree that Laman was over 20 either. Here are the reasons.
I agree that the books of 1 Nephi and 2 Nephi are not a diary. They are a religious memoir (2 Nephi 5:30-32). And I agree that knowing when Lehi was born is a good start in estimating the age of Nephi and his brothers at the time they left Jerusalem (1 Nephi 2:4), which was probably near the 4th day of the 10th month (Tevet) in the year 3165 (596 BCE). It would have been near the end of the week long Canaanite festival of Returning Light (waxing to waning moon) and was near the end of the first year of Zedekiah's reign (1 Nephi 1:4). It also was the beginning of the rainy season in the Hejaz in Arabia, so the wadis would be flowing water for at least 3 more months.
However, a better estimate of Nephi's age is that he had not yet reached the age of compulsory military service, which was age 20 (Numbers 1:45). It is apparent that not only Nephi but also his brothers had not reached age 20 during the previous year, which was the year of the Babylonian siege (2 Kings 24:10). This is because when the siege that deposed King Jehoiachin ended and put Zedekiah on the throne in 597 BC (2 Kings 24:12-17), neither Nephi nor any of his brothers were in the army defending Jerusalem's walls. Nephi admitted that he had never wanted to shed human blood (1 Nephi 4:10).
If Nephi and his brothers had been old enough to be among the defenders of Jerusalem during the 597 BC siege, they would have been taken prisoner and marched off to Babylon (2 Kings 24:14-16). All the soldiers, their commanders and all the young men of military age, which amounted to more than 10,000 young men were force marched to Babylon (2 Kings 24:12-16). Nephi and his brothers had to be younger than 20, or they would have been taken to Babylon before Zedekiah began his reign (2 Kings 24:17-19) and before Lehi received his prophetic call (1 Nephi 1:4-15).
LEHI WAS NOT AN OLD GEEZER - PART 1.
ReplyDeleteLehi was definitely not an old geezer born around 660 BC. That is far too early in the reign of evil King Manasseh in Judah. Lehi would have been lucky to survive in that time frame. It would place his childhood in the worst part of wicked King Manasseh's reign of terror (2 Kings 21:16, 2 Chronicles 33:5-7). Manasseh ruled for 55 years between 687 and 642 BC (2 Kings 21:1, 2 Chronicles 33:1). Had Lehi been born early in Manasseh's reign, he would have been lucky to have survived childhood (2 Kings 21:6, Jeremiah 32:35).
Latter-day saint scholars, including Talmage (1924), Widtsoe (1935), Nibley (1952, 1988), Cheesman(1970, 1978, 1988), Welch (1985), Peterson (1988), Sorenson (1997), Aston (2015) all place Lehi's birth in the last 5 years of King Manasseh's reign (2 Chronicles 33:12-16) after his captivity in Babylon by Ashurbanipal, the king of Assyria (2 Chronicles 33:11). And they estimate his age when he left Jerusalem to be in his mid to late 40s.
Lehi was obviously born sometime near the end of evil King Manasseh's reign, between 650 and 645 BC, when Manasseh had repented of his evil ways (2 Chronicles 33:12-16). Otherwise Lehi would have grown up as an idol worshiper, if he had grown up at all. After all, about half of the babies born in Jerusalem died in their first year of life (Welch 1985, Geva 2003, 2007, 2014,).
LEHI WAS NOT AN OLD GEEZER - Part 3.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, Lehi was born into an idolatrous family near the end of Manasseh's reign, sometime between 650 and 645 BC. He was probably presented at the temple as a toddler, after it was cleansed and rededicated in the years of King Manasseh's repentance (2 Chronicles 33:12-16). It is obvious that he grew up and grew to middle age during the righteous reign of King Josiah who undid all the evil that King Manasseh and King Amon forced onto all the people of the Kingdom of Judah, between 687 and 640 (2 Kings 21:1-26).
References (LDS Scholars)
Aston, W. P. 2015. Lehi and Sariah in Arabia: The Old World Setting of the Book of Mormon. Xlibris Corp., Bloomington, IN.
Cheesman, P. R., M. F. Cheesman, S. Heimdal. 1970. Great Leaders of the Book of Mormon. Promised Land Publications, Salt Lake City, UT.
Cheesman, P. R. 1978. The World of the Book of Mormon. Deseret Book, Salt Lake City, UT.
Cheesman, P. R. 1988. Lehi's Journeys. The Book of Mormon: First Nephi, The Doctrinal Foundation. Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, BYU, Provo, UT.
Nibley, H. 1952. Lehi in the Desert: & The World of the Jaredites. Bookcraft Publishing Co., Salt Lake City, UT.
Nibley, H. 1988. Lehi in the desert; The world of the Jaredites; There were Jaredites. The Collected Works of Hugh Nibley, Vol. 5 (J. W. Welch, ed.). FARMS and Deseret Book, Provo & Salt Lake City, UT.
Peterson, H. D. 1988. Father Lehi. The Book of Mormon: First Nephi, the Doctrinal Foundation (M. S. Nyman, C. D. Tate Jr., eds.). Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT. pp. 55-66.
Sorenson, J. L. 1997. The Composition of Lehi's Family. Nephite Culture and Society: Collected Papers. New Sage Books, Salt Lake City, UT.
Talmage, J. E. 1924. The Book of Mormon: an account of its origin, With evidences of its genuineness and authenticity: two lectures. Zion's Printing and Publishing Co., Independence, MO.
Welch, J. W. 1985. Longevity of Book of Mormon People and the "Age of Man". J.Collegium Aesculapium. pp. 35-45.
Widtsoe, J. A. and F. S. Harris. 1935. Seven Claims of the Book of Mormon: A Collection of Evidences. Zion's Printing and Publishing Co., Independence, MO.
Secular References
Geva, H. 1979. The western boundary of Jerusalem at the end of the Monarchy. Israel Exploration Journal. pp.84-91.
Geva, H. 2003. Western Jerusalem at the End of the First Temple Period in Light of the Excavations in the Jewish Quarter, No. 18. Part 2, The Rise and Fall of Jerusalem at the End of the Judahite Kingdom. Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology: The First Temple Period (A. G. Vaughn & A. E. Killebrew, eds). Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta, GA. pp.183.
Geva, H. 2007. A chronological reevaluation of YEHUD stamp impressions in Palaeo-Hebrew script, based on finds from excavations in the Jewish Quarter of the old city of Jerusalem. Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 34(1):92-103.
Geva, H. 2014. Jerusalem's population in antiquity: A minimalist view. Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 41(2):131-160.
LEHI IN NEVER OWNED A FARM IN THE LAND OF JERUSALEM
ReplyDeleteThe idea that Lehi somehow had a farm and lived on it outside Jerusalem’s city wall is not only impossible but also turns holy scripture on its head (Numbers 35:1-8, Joshua 13:63, 21:1-4, Judges 1:21).
First, from 609 to 586 BC, nobody lived outside the walls of Jerusalem. That included Lehi. Nephi says Lehi had a house in Jerusalem (1 Nephi 1:7). This was because from 622 to 586 the Kingdom of Judah was almost continually at war with neighboring states (Egypt, Ammon, Moab, Edom, Babylon), which were regularly besieging the city (2 Kings 23:29, 24:1-17; 2 Chronicles 35:20-22, 36:2-4). So nobody in Jerusalem had a permanent residence outside the walls.
Archeological evidence uncovered in Jerusalem’s Old City by Dr. Hillel Geva of Hebrew University of Jerusalem shows that around 610 to 586 BC the entire population of Jerusalem declined by several thousand and was living exclusively inside the city walls (Geva 1979, 2003, 2007, 2014).
Second, Lehi could never have a farm or grazing land near Jerusalem. He was not from the tribe of Benjamin, and therefore, he had no right to land anywhere near Jerusalem. All the farmland, pasture and grazing land around Jerusalem belonged to the clans of Judah and Benjamin who could not sell it but could sell houses in the walled cities (Leviticus 25:23-30, 33-34; Joshua 15:1, 20, 21, 63; Joshua 18:11, 28).
Further, because he was neither from the tribe of Judah nor the tribe of Benjamin, he had no right to land anywhere in the Kingdom of Judah. These included the territories given by the Lord to the tribes of Judah and Benjamin (Joshua 14:1-3, 15:1-12, 18:11-20). If a property owner died without heirs, the property reverted to the clan for reassignment (Ezra 10:2-16).
LEHI IN NEVER OWNED A FARM IN THE LAND OF JERUSALEM - PART 2
ReplyDeleteThe idea that Lehi somehow had a farm and lived on it outside Jerusalem’s city wall is not only impossible but also turns holy scripture on its head (Numbers 35:1-8, Joshua 13:63, 21:1-4, Judges 1:21).
Third, Lehi was an outsider from the tribe of Manasseh (Alma 10:3). And he always would be to those who held land and houses in the Kingdom of Judah (Judah & Benjamin) who not only saw Lehi as an outsider, but also distrusted and hated him (2 Nephi 19:21, 1 Nephi 1:19-20). Not only did outsiders have no property rights in Judah, but Jews who married outside their tribe also lost their property rights (Ezra 10:2-16).
Lehi’s immediate ancestors with other members of his tribe fled from Samaria to Jerusalem as refugees in 722 BC when Shalmanezer invaded Samaria (2 Kings 17:3-6, 18:9-11). They avoided the fate of most of their tribe who either stayed behind west of the Jordan River or those east of Jordan who were exiled to the land of the Medes in what is now northwestern Iran (2 Kings 17:6, 18:11). But the Manassehites in the land of Judah and Benjamin had no right to property in the Kingdom of Judah.
The next generation of Lehi’s ancestors had to withstand Sennacherib’s siege of Jerusalem in 701 BC (2 Kings 18:13, 26-29, 19:6-7,20,32-37; 2 Chronicles 32:1-2, 9-10, 22, Isaiah 36:1-2, 11-12,33-38). Lehi’s grandparents were the second generation born in the Kingdom of Judah, and his parents were the third. Lehi, in all likelihood was the fourth generation to be born and grow up in the kingdom, and according to Nephi, he was born, raised, married and reared his older children in Jerusalem (1 Nephi 1:4).
Lehi’s ancestors had remained in the Kingdom of Judah (1 Nephi 1:5,7). But other Manasseh refugees fled further south into the Hejaz on the coast of the Red Sea. They found refuge in oasis towns in the Lihyan kingdom also called Dadān or Dedan and as far south as Yathrib, M'ain, Qataban, Hadhramaut, and Saba (Gadd 1958, Doe 1971, Breton 1999, Isl. Awar., ed. 2018).
LEHI IN NEVER OWNED A FARM IN THE LAND OF JERUSALEM - PART 3
ReplyDeleteThe idea that Lehi somehow had a farm and lived on it outside Jerusalem’s city wall is not only impossible but also turns holy scripture on its head (Numbers 35:1-8, Joshua 13:63, 21:1-4, Judges 1:21).
Fourth, Lehi couldn’t hold land anywhere in the kingdom. The royal family, tribe and clan chiefs, and other elite families in the tribes of Judah and Benjamin held all the land in perpetuity in the lands of Judah (Joshua 15:1-12). Benjaminites, the other tribe whose land of inheritance was inside the borders of the kingdom, held all the land in the small territory given to the tribe of Benjamin, which bordered on the north of Judah and south of the land given to the half-tribe of Manasseh (Joshua 18:11).
Many of the large landowners in the Kingdom of Judah were landlords who lived in the capital. They had servants and tenants to work their land and tend their flocks, herds, fields and vineyards (Lev. 19:13, Deut. 23:24-25, Matt. 21:33-46, Mark 12:1-9, Luke 20:9-16).
The Law also prohibited Lehi from purchasing any land in the kingdom or any land in the former Kingdom of Israel (Leviticus 25:23). Lehi’s land of inheritance was somewhere in Samaria between Bashan and Gilead, most probably near Gilgal, which was only a day’s journey north of Jerusalem (Joshua 15:7, 16:1-4, 17:1-12).
Fifth, any farming Lehi would have done could only have been as a tenant or a servant on Jerusalem's communal land allocated to the clans of Benjamin and Judah. These fields and grazing lands had no provisions for inheritance by anyone outside these clans (Leviticus 4:27, 25:34; Jeremiah 26:23). Any land of Lehi's inheritance would have been in the lands of Manasseh in Samaria (Joshua 16:1-4, 17:1-12).
LEHI IN NEVER OWNED A FARM IN THE LAND OF JERUSALEM
ReplyDeleteThe idea that Lehi somehow had a farm and lived on it outside Jerusalem’s city wall is not only impossible but also turns holy scripture on its head (Numbers 35:1-8, Joshua 13:63, 21:1-4, Judges 1:21).
Sixth, after Josiah’s conquest and purification of Samaria and Galilee, including Gilgal and Beth-el, the traditional lands of Lehi’s inheritance, may have again been open to him. If he had served in Josiah’s army during the conquest, he may have received a title from the king in those lands of his traditional inheritance, assigned from the original conquest to the half-tribe of Manasseh west of Jordan (Joshua 14:1, 16:1-2, 17:11).
Lehi may also have benefitted from gold, silver and precious things (1 Nephi 3:22) taken from the idolatrous temples and shrines in Beth-el and in the houses of the high places and from the estates of the idolatrous priests (1 Kings 12:28-29, 2 Kings 23:5, 8-9, 13, 15, 19-20).
Finally, after February, 597 BC, there was plenty of room inside the walls of Jerusalem and plenty of empty houses. More than 18,000 of Jerusalem’s residents were gone. The most prominent families of the Jews, including the king, the royal family, the nobles, the tribal and clan leaders, the wealthy landowners and merchants, all the young men in the army and their commanders, all the smiths and craftsmen, many of the religious leaders and scholars were rounded up and marched into exile in Babylon (2 Kings 24:10-17, Jeremiah 29:1-2, Ezekiel 1:1-2, Daniel 1:1-4).
Lehi’s family would have had no problem staying a year in Jerusalem but would have had no right to property or farmland even after Jerusalem’s surrender to the Babylonians (2 Kings 24:11-12). The land of Judah was not Lehi’s land of inheritance. Lehi’s land of inheritance lay some distance to the north and at a lower elevation than Jerusalem (1 Nephi 2:4, 11, 3:22-24).
Lehi was wise in keeping his gold, silver and precious things (1 Nephi 3:22), possibly looted from pagan shrines such as Beth-el and other idolatrous sites in Samaria (2 Kings 23:5, 8, 13-15, 19-20) and keeping it in the land of his inheritance, probably somewhere in the Jordan Valley near Gilgal, less than a day’s journey from Jerusalem (Joshua 5:9-10; 16:1-4).
REFERENCES
Breton, J-F. 1999 Arabia Felix. Univ. Notre Dame, pp. 13-20, 23; 53-73; 3-5, 41-43.
Doe, B. 1971. South Arabia. Thames & Hudson, London. pp. 60–102.
Gadd, C. J. 1958. The Harran Inscriptions of Nabonidus. Anatolian Studies 8:59.
Geva, H. 1979. The western boundary of Jerusalem at the end of the Monarchy. Israel Exploration Journal. pp.84-91.
Geva, H. 2003. Western Jerusalem at the End of the First Temple Period in Light of the Excavations in the Jewish Quarter, No. 18. Part 2, The Rise and Fall of Jerusalem at the End of the Judahite Kingdom. Jerusalem in Bible and Archaeology: The First Temple Period (A. G. Vaughn & A. E. Killebrew, eds). Society of Biblical Literature, Atlanta, GA. pp.183.
Geva, H. 2007. A chronological reevaluation of YEHUD stamp impressions in Palaeo-Hebrew script, based on finds from excavations in the Jewish Quarter of the old city of Jerusalem. Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 34(1):92-103.
Geva, H. 2014. Jerusalem's population in antiquity: A minimalist view. Journal of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 41(2):131-160.
Islamic Awareness (ed.). 2018. A Pre-Islamic Nabataean Inscription Mentioning The Place Yathrib. Islamic Awareness. p. 1.
LEHI MARRIED YOUNG AND WAS NOT A SKILLED CRAFTSMAN OR TRADESMAN
ReplyDeleteLehi did not marry at age 30 or older. He most likely followed tradition and married around age 20 to 25. His wife Sariah may have come to live with him and his parents as Lehi helped with his father's occupation. He definitely did not complete an apprenticeship or his skills would have attracted the attention of the Babylonians. Not only that, even apprentices were taken captive to Babylon with the other 18,000 repatriated by Nebuchadnezzor (2 Kings 24:12-16, Jeremiah 29:1-2).
How do we know that Lehi was not a skilled craftsman or tradesman? Because if he had been a skilled craftsman or tradesman, he and his family would have been dragged off to Babylon in 597 BC. Even if he was an apprentice in a trade or craft, he would have been included in the 18,000 taken captive to Babylon (2 Kings 24:14-17).
That would have been a year before Nebuchadnezzar imposed Mattaniah (renamed Zedekiah) as king over the poor who remained in Jerusalem. If Lehi had been a craftsman or tradesman, he would never have had a chance to receive his first vision and have had a chance to leave Jerusalem for the wilderness in the Hejaz in the borders of the Red Sea (1 Nephi 1:4-6).
Nephi informs us that Lehi remained behind in Jerusalem (1 Nephi 1:4). And Jeremiah informs us that Lehi was among the wretched rag-pickers, the “poorest sort of the people”, who weren’t worth dragging off to Babylon (2 Kings 24:14).
Sorenson (1997) determined from the passages in 2 Kings 24, 2 Chronicles and Jeremiah , and the land laws in the Law of Moses, that Lehi probably was employed in some form of husbandry, either agricultural or animal. And if he was involved in husbandry, it was more likely he was a husbandman, taking care of a landlord’s land and livestock. This would explain his having tents travel provisions, and most likely animals to carry them including sheep for sacrifice. If Lehi did have land of his own, it probably wasn’t in close proximity to Jerusalem. It was probably in the lands apportioned to the half tribe of Manasseh west of Jordan (Joshua 17:1-3, 5-12, 17-18).
The original apportionment of land in Israel was traditionally held to have been in the time of Moses and Joshua (Numbers 26:52-54, 33:54; Joshua 17:1-3, 5-12, 17-18). So a "land of inheritance" was believed to be an ancestral plot, which should remain within a family in perpetuity. And if not in a specific family's possession, then at least in the possession of the clan (Ezra 10:2-16).
Although Jerusalem was in the territory allocated to the tribe of Benjamin (Joshua 18:28, Judges 1:21), it remained under the independent control of the Jebusites (Joshua 15:63, Judges 1:21). Technically, Jerusalem was within the territory of Benjamin. However, the tribe of Judah also claimed it (Joshua 15:63). In any event, Jerusalem remained an independent Jebusite city until David ultimately conquered it in 1010 BC (2 Samuel 5:6-7, 1 Chronicles 11:4-8) and made it the capital of the unified Kingdom of Israel (2 Samuel 5:3-9). After the breakup of the United Monarchy, Jerusalem continued as the capital of the southern Kingdom of Judah (1 Kings 14:21).
Nibley (1952, 1988) and Tvedtnes (1999) suggest that Lehi was a caravaneer. It would explain the tents, provisions and beasts of burden. It would not necessarily explain the sheep for sacrifice. However, as a caravaneer, he would have been useless to the Babylonians. And it would have been a suitable occupation for someone who lived in Jerusalem but could not own land in its immediate vicinity.
REFERENCES
Nibley, H. 1952. Lehi in the Desert: & The World of the Jaredites. Bookcraft Publishing Co., Salt Lake City, UT.
Sorenson, J. L. 1997. The Composition of Lehi's Family. Nephite Culture and Society: Collected Papers. New Sage Books, Salt Lake City, UT.
Tvedtnes, J. A. 1999. Chapter 10: Was Lehi a Caravaneer? The Most Correct Book: Insights from a Book of Mormon Scholar. Cornerstone Publishing, Salt Lake City, UT. pp. 76-98.
LEHI WAS POOR, NOT RICH
ReplyDeleteThe kingdom of Judah was almost continually at war throughout most of Lehi's life and practically all of Nephi's life (Chronicles 36:1-5, 2 Kings 24:1-3). And Nephi and his brothers apparently were too young to serve in the army during Cheshvan (8th month), the month men over 20 of the tribe of Manasseh had compulsory miltary service (1 Chronicles 12:19-20, 27:11). In fact, this was the month of the Hebrew year 3163 that the armies of Nebuchadnezzor with Ammonite, Moabite and Edomite allies began their 3 month siege of Jehoiakim's Jerusalem (2 Kings 24:10).
Lehi and his family were obviously poverty stricken nobodies, just like Urijah the Benjaminite (Jeremiah 26:20-23). In fact they were worse off than Urijah. Lehi's family were simply the "poorest sort of the people" and were completely worthless in the eyes of the Babylonians (2 Kings 24:14). These poor people were left as husbandmen (farmers and herders) and vinedressers (2 Kings 25:12). Then Mattaniah (renamed Zedekiah) was made a Babylonian puppet king to rule over a population "rag pickers" (2 Kings 24:17-19).
Lehi's "gold and his silver and his precious things" (1 Nephi 2:4, 11; 3:22-24) despite Nephi's accout probably didn't amount to much, but looked like a great deal to Laban (1 Nephi 3:25) after what was left after the Babylonian army had looted the city (2 Kings 24:13, 25:15).
Any small amount of gold and silver and precious things (1 Nephi 2:4) left in Lehi's land of inheritance, were probably objects looted from the temple at Beth-el, the high places and from the estates of the idolatrous priests who served the gods in Beth-el and other parts of Samaria while he was serving in the army of King Josiah (2 Kings 23:14-15, 19-20).
So we may conclude that Lehi was far from being a man of wealth despite his son Nephi's biased opinion of him. This just one more thing that points out that Nephi was just a kid when he left Jerusalem. A kid is not going to give an objective and unbiased opinion of his prophet father.
How can you account for the fact that Lehi remained in Jerusalem after the Babylonians took everything and every person of any account out of the city before they installed Mattaniah (renamed Zedekiah) as king of the vassal state of Judah?