Monday, May 7, 2018

Knowing How to Learn the Truth – Part III

Continued from the previous post regarding the manner of discovering truth amidst the oddball ideas man comes up with that literally require our research and understanding to know the truth—which is especially true of the geography of the Land of Promise in the Book of Mormon. This is obviously necessary as these oddball ideas gain traction, such as the recent survey shows.
    The recent survey, mentioned earlier, showing 33% of 18-24 year olds believe that the earth is flat, suggests that even the most ridiculous ideas can gain a strong foothold in the public conscience. Consider that this generational age will soon be formulating scientific ideas, university curriculums, and leading our country, one can easily see the future difficulty in discovering the truth. We see that looking backward at what happened in the early 1900s as a result of Darwin’s theories that challenged creation teaching in schools prior to that time. The challenge really took hold following World War I when the Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy took place. In 1968 the U.S. Supreme Court that allowing the teaching of creation violated the Establishment Clause, and reinforced that with decisions in 1987 and again in 2005.
    The problem often is that new ideas and theories seldom are challenged, but allowed to have free reign until they no longer represent minority thinking, but begin to dominate society. As for the current Flat-Earthers, who are evidently not ones to pay attention to facts, these they insist that there is a massive cover-up occurring for some unknown reason. What’s worse still: An inordinate number of Millennials are being suckered into an egregious web by these science-denying people.
From space, the obvious curvature of the Earth is undeniable. Any astronaut, cosmonaut, or passenger aboard a Space Shuttle or a Space Station can obviously see the difference and its stark reality is not something reflected by the curve of a window, anymore than the faceplate of a space suit would cause such a distortion to a space walker, of which there has been many. Even photos are taken of the Earth outside the vehicle during EVA

In fact, of the 217 different individuals who have completed a total of 735 spacewalks, looking only through a facemask at the Earth, Russian Anatoly Solovyev walked 16 times; Russians Aleksandr Serebrov, Gennady Padalka and Sergei Avdeyev, and Americans Michael Lopez-Alegria and Peggy Whitson 10 walks each; Americans Michael Fincke, Richard Mastracchio and Jerry L. Ross, and Russian Vladimir N. Deszhurov 9 each; with numerous others making multiple walks each, including 11 American women and one Russian woman.
    Nor does it seem to matter that commercial jets typically cruise at around 28-35,000 feet (up to 6.6 miles of altitude above the Earth). The Concorde when it was in service flew at a higher altitude of 45,000 feet to 60,000, and the SR-71 spy plane could fly at 85,000 feet, 16 miles up. What do these heights prove other than giving a perfect view of the curvature of the Earth? “Flat-Earthers” discard their view because they claim, they are looking through curved windshields which, they insist, gives a “curved” view of the Earth.
Top Left: The curved canopy of an F-16 fighter jet cockpit; Others are commercial jetliners, all showing all or some of the windscreens flat, providing no possible distortion

The fact that many commercial planes do not have “curved” windscreens, but flat ones seems lost on these “Flat Earthers,” and that if the curvature of a cockpit in a fighter jet distorted distances, pilots would have difficulty in lining up combat dog-fighting alignments for “kills,” especially in the age before computerized targeting. Plus the fact that the cameras on the SR-71 were so advanced, that they could photograph a golf ball on the green from 80,000 feet; and survey 110,000 square miles of the Earth's surface per hour—where would be the distortion?
    The point of all of this is merely to show that in the search for answers to questions regarding the Book of Mormon and the Land of Promise, truth is the ultimate determining factor—not someone’s view of the truth, or someone’s attempt to prove their viewpoint, belief or perspective, but the actual truth. In fact, so important is this that the Apostle John wrote, “Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).
    Thus, we see that the light of truth dispels the darkness in which lies the stronghold of evil, discontent, and falsity. Corrupt thought is the bondage of the powers of the soul, and this bondage is willed because the soul does not see its fearful evil—does not always see the mistaken, untruth, distorted, inaccurate, incorrect, erroneous, flawed, imprecise, fallacious and misleading ideas in which it surrounds itself. Some people promote deceptive, deluded, and fictitious ideas for nefarious reasons, others simply because they are misguided, misinformed, or too lazy to think and determine truth for themselves but accept what they hear.
Rod Meldrum’s map of Lehi’s landing site on the Gulf coast of Florida (yellow added) in an area today called Crystal Springs, about 90-miles north of Tampa. From there Lehi traveled 400 miles to Mobile, Alabama area for their first settlement in the Land of First Inheritance

Take Heartland theorist Rod Meldrum’s 2010 article “Lehi’s Voyage Demonstrated: Phoenicia Expedition!” in which he insists that Lehi landed on the Gulf Coast of Florida, claiming that: “Some have claimed, incorrectly, that there is a scriptural requirement for a west coast landing. However, nowhere in the Book of Mormon does it state that they sailed east in their ship or that they landed on the west coast of the promised land.”
    It is interesting how people can make such adamant statements that are completely false and not even know it. Mormon, writing centuries after this landing, with all the records of the Nephites at his disposal and study, tells us something entirely different. He says, in describing the Land of Promise to his future reader: “Now, the more idle part of the Lamanites lived in the wilderness, and dwelt in tents; and they were spread through the wilderness on the west, in the land of Nephi; yea, and also on the west of the land of Zarahemla, in the borders by the seashore, and on the west in the land of Nephi, in the place of their fathers' first inheritance, and thus bordering along by the seashore” (Alma22:28, emphasis added).
    In this simple statement, Mormon tells us:
1. There were Lamanites along the west coast of the Land of Nephi;
2. There were Lamanites along the west coast of the Land of Zarahemla;
3. There were also Lamanites along the west coast of the Land of Nephi to the south where Lehi landed.
    Stated differently, Mormon tells us that Nephite landed along the coast of the West Sea. And in the following verse, he states: “And also there were many Lamanites on the east by the seashore…and thus the Nephites were nearly surrounded by the Lamanites.” Now, unless the Lamanties were along the east coast and the west coast of the Land of Zarahemla, and within the Land of Nephi to the south, the Nephites could not have been “nearly surrounded.” But they were, so there can be no question that the area of First Landing was along the west seashore.
    Thus, we find the Hebrew word “YRŠ,” which is a root word meaning “to inherit.” In addition, the Hebrew word nachalah נַחֲלָה, means “inheritance,” and is used 224 times in the Old Testament, with 207 times translated as inheritance, 16 times as “heritage.” It refers to “property, something inherited, an estate, portion or possession.” The word is taken from nachal נָחַל, meaning “inherit.” The purpose is in the inheritance of land, and as divided among family members.
(See the next post, “Knowing How to Learn the Truth – Part IV,” to better understand the Land of First Inheritance, and what the term means)

No comments:

Post a Comment