In 1828, Noah Webster wrote following the word “temple” that it was “a public edifice erected in honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. In Rome, some of the temples were open, and called sacella; others were roofed, and called oedes. The most celebrated of the ancient pagan temples were that of Belus in Babylon, that of Vulcan at Memphis, that of Jupiter at Thebes, that of Diana at Ephesus, that of Apollo in Miletus, that of Jupiter Olympus in Athens, and that of Apollo at Delphi. The most celebrated and magnificent temple erected to the true God, was that built by Solomon in Jerusalem.”
Thus we see that the word “temple” had to do with either celebrating ancient pagan gods, or the God, and his Son. In the case of pagan gods, several temples were erected, some in separate cities, sometimes several in one city, such as those in Rome. On the other hand, in the case of the Jews, there was only one temple in their entire nation, tough it being just a small country of territory, and that was in Jerusalem.
The three temples specifically
mentioned in the scriptural record. The world “temples” in the plural is also
mentioned in a few places, but it is not known if that is meant to be more than
this three or not
The plural is also used in: “But behold, a hundredth part of the proceedings of this people, yea, the account of the Lamanites and of the Nephites, and their wars, and contentions, and dissensions, and their preaching, and their prophecies, and their shipping and their building of ships, and their building of temples, and of synagogues and their sanctuaries, and their righteousness, and their wickedness…cannot be contained in this work” (Helaman 3:14).
It should also be noted that these two scriptural references indicate both “synagogues,” and “sanctuaries” in the plural. Therefore, we must conclude that within the Land of Promise, there were numerous places of worship. We also know that a synagogue is not a temple, for it is “a building where a Jewish assembly or congregation meets for religious worship and instruction,” much like our Ward buildings and Stake Centers today. The term “sanctuary” is both a “house consecrated to the worship of God, a place where divine service is performed” (Psalms 73:17), and a place of refuge or protection.
The term “sanctuary” is taken from the Latin “sanctus,” meaning “sacred.” Therefore, the Nephites built many structures used for religious worship, instruction, and asylum—the latter meaning a place of refuge from illegal seizure and prosecution (in the pagan world, it was a place where criminals, even the vilest ones, were protected).
Pachacamac sits on the top of a hill
overlooking the ocean to the west and the larger complex to the east and
southeast
It might also be understood that king Noah, not a righteous king, but an evil ruler, built himself a spacious palace, and a throne in the midst thereof, ornamented with gold and silver and with precious things” (Mosiah 11:9); he also might have built another or different temple—this one, perhaps, in the valley, which religious protocol of temple building would not have been important to him. When it is stated of him, that he "caused his workmen should work all manner of fine work within the walls of the temple" (Mosiah 11:10), it doesn't say specifically that he built a temple, on the other hand, it does not say it wasn’t a new temple when describing the walls within it.
He built himself a spacious palace,
and a throne in the midst of it
There is another important matter, in determining the temple or temples in Cuzco. First of all, the Temple of the Sun, is in reality called Inti Manqus wasi, which is translated by archaeologists, etc, as “Sun Temple” and, in fact, the word “inti” has become synonymous with “sun,” however, Inti is the name used to depict the all-powerful god in Quechua, the son of Viracocha (Wiraqucha). Literally, Inti means “Son of Viracocha, or Son of God, and when applied to the temple, The Temple of the Son. In fact, there is an annual festival in Peru called Inti Raymi, today meaning "sun festival," but this event dates far back in time to the extravagant celebration then known as the Inti Raymi'rata, or "festival of the Son," and was oriented to being thankful to God for the abundant harvest and plead for the next year's crop to also be abundant.
Obviously, since archaeology and anthropology cannot accept that “the Son of God” was part of any ancient religion in the Americas, the Temple of the Son has become the Temple of the Sun or Sun Temple. It is also likely that by Inca times, Inti, a god of the ancient cultures and adopted by the Inca after numerous conquests of other cultures, became “sun” rather than “son.”
In the pantheon of gods in ancient Andean Peru, Viracocha (sometimes called Apu), was the “Supreme Inti” (Supreme God), God the Father, higher in status than Inti or any other, though He usually remained in the background of worldly affairs and allowed Inti to actually govern the world. Churi Inti or Son Inti, who represents the Son of Viracocha, was referred to as Daylight—he was a benevolent and generous god who looked after his people, but also capable of anger; there was also a third member of this pantheon or Godhead called Inti Wawqi, or Into Brother; also spelled Inti-Guauqui or Inti-Huaoqui.
On the lower level (or mortality), was Villac Umu, meaning the High Priest of the Son, who presided over rites in honor of Inti, assisted by priests. By the time “Inti” became “inti” meanng sun, rather than Son, the temple became the Temple of the Sun, and the gods became suns, and the Villac Umu was the High Priest of the Sun.
Viracocha, the great creator god in
ancient Peruvian mythology, whose image was carved into the top center of the Gateway of the Sun
in Tiwanaku, long before the Inca came upon the scene, and which god the Inca
adopted
Left: The image of a sun on the
Nauvoo Temple, representing the Celestial Kingdom; Right; The ancient Inca God
Viracocha, the Creator God and Father of Inti
Your posts are very interesting.I always follow you.I believe that Pachacamac was the Zarahemla's temple.Thanks
ReplyDeleteThanks, Alan.
ReplyDelete