Thursday, September 16, 2021

Jaredites in Nephite Times – Part II

Even though in the Scriptural Record there is no indication, no record, no reference, not even a hint of suggestion that any indigenous or non-Nephite people, culture or languages, existed in the land of promise during the Book of Mormon record (600 B.C. to about 421 A.D.), John L. Sorenson and other Mesoamerican theorists insist there were. To these theorists, other cultures, languages and peoples lived there before, during and after the Nephite era providing a long and detailed history of their Mesoamerica model that does not match the scriptural record.

As absurd as this is, Sorenson insists:

“The treaty the Nephites had been forced to make would obviously be to areas inhabited by their own folk, not by strangers.”

What strangers?

 

There were no people mentioned or suggested in the scriptural record that would be classified as “strangers” other than Mulekites when first encountered—and that was short-lived since they were absorbed into the Nephites Mosiah brought out of the Land of Nephi. There simply were no such indigenous people existing anywhere in the Land of Promise only in theorists opinions and beliefs. What is amazing about all this is theorists unusual approach to what does and what does not exist in the record.

When it suits the purpose of the theorists, especially Mesoamerican theorists, to invent tens of thousands of indigenous people without one recorded word to suggest such, they can turn around and claim that when something is not in the record, then it must not have existed. Speaking in support of his view that no Nephites lived in the area of Moron, Sorenson writes:

“Nowhere in the Nephite record is there any indication that they occupied that zone,” yet turn right around and claim there were indigenous people in the land that are not mentioned in the record but were there!

How can anyone use the argument that something is not in the record, therefore it did not exist, when throughout their entire arguments, they keep insisting numerous things that are not in the record as existing? This is the fodder for humorous writing, and if it were not so serious a matter it would be humorous. Consider:

• Theorist: There is an extensive claim that there were indigenous people in the Land of Promise—though the scriptural record does not record a single one;

• Theorist: There is no mention that there were Nephites in the Land of Moron—but the scriptural record claims Nephites occupied that land;

• Theorist: There were those in the Land of Promise considered strangers to the Nephites—the scriptural record lists no people that were strangers to the Nephites (oher than the Mulekites who were quickly absorbed); 

Western coastal shoreline of Land of Promise

 

• Theorist: It is claimed there were highlands (highland mass) in the western half of the Land Northward—however, there is no mention in the scriptural record of western highlands in the Land Northward;

• Theorist: Theorists claim there were non-Nephite people speaking other languages in the Land of Promise—the scriptural record lists no such people, let alone another language;

The list of contradictions does not end here, of course, but that should suffice to show the convoluted thinking of these theorists, including Sorenson, and to what ends they will go to try and support their models.

Mormon says north and south.
Sorenson, Nibley, and other Mesoamerican theorists says east and west.
But there are many other areas of immediately interest and, likewise, of immediate concern:
Nephi tells us and Mormon verifies that there were no other people in the Land of Promise other than the Jaredites, Nephites, Mulekites and Lamanites.
Sorenson, Nibley, Roberts and other Mesoamerican theorists tell us there were all sorts of other people in the Land of Promise.
Mormon says both the Jaredites and Nephites used metallurgy extensively.
Sorenson in his 1985 landmark book argues for metallurgy existence in 600 A.D., and claims the future will show us more and it is only a matter of time—however, 34 years later, no change in metallurgy archaeology in Mesoamerica has yet been discovered, despite the extensive work done in that area, both by Church archaeologist and others.
Mormon says there is a Sea North and a Sea South.
Sorenson and other Mesoamerican theorists say there are only two seas, the Sea East, located in the north, and Sea West, located in the south.
Mormon says Hagoth’s sailed to the north from his shipyard on the West Sea near the Narrow Neck of Land

• Theorist: Sorenson places his Land of Many Waters in Mesoamerica 350 miles away from his hill Cumorah—Mormon places the hill within the Land of Cumorah, which is within the Land of Many Waters, all in the same area.

• Theorist: Mesoamerican theorists claim there were just two seas: East and West—the scriptural record list four seas: North, East, South and West.

• Theorist: Sorenson and other Mesoamericanists claim Nephi landed on, and occupied an isthmus—the scriptural record states that Jacob states, and Nephi records on the plates, that the Nephites landed and lived on an island

Corinatumr writing on the stone in Zarahemla before his death

 

• Theorist: Sorenson, Nibley and others tell us that Jaredites survived and lived into the Nephite era and influenced the Nephites—however, the scriptural record states that all the Jaredites had been wiped out and killed, that only the Jaredites Coriantumr and Ether remained;

• Theorist: Sorenson and others tell us that Mulek landed among the Jaredites in the Land Northward and migrated down to Zarahemla later—on the other hand, Mormon states that Mulek landed along the seashore and settled there and lived there from the time they first arrived in the Land of Promise

• Theorist: Sorenson, using the Mayan calendar, tells us the Flood occurred in 3113 BC—Moses tells us in the Bible that the Flood came in 2344 BC, and all Book of Mormon, Land of Promise dates are based on that dating.

• Theorist: Sorenson claims that in the first centuries after Nephi’s landing, no indication is given that the Hebrew speech of the Nephites changed to any other tongue though the possibility remains. Other Mesoamerican theorists claim that it is unlikely that the Hebrew persisted down to the time of Cumorah—yet, Moroni tells us that the Nephites spoke Hebrew throughout their time in the Land of Promise.”

It does not matter who is speaking, short of a revelation voted on by the Church, anyone stating something different than is stated in the scriptura record, is doing so from their personal viewpoint, which is especially true of listening to theorists promote their theories, opinions and beliefs, no matter how strongly and convincingly they may be.


8 comments:

  1. Hey Guys,

    Could anyone please share any good continously updated South American archeology websites with me and everyone?

    Thanks JRA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What exactly are you looking for? A comprehensive list of ruins all in one place?

      There are sources all over the place, but none that I have found that are comprehensive. I've been marking ruins on a Google Earth file as I come across them. But there are literally thousands of small-scale ruins scattered all over the Andes, so I've had to try to narrow it down to the more sizeable ones that at least amount to a village or settlement, up to a major city or prominent landmark.

      Delete
  2. Originally I was wanting a site that updates current findings and explorations. The map you describe sounds very intriguing. Is it something youncan share?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is Del doing ok he hasn’t blogged in a couple of weeks ?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you or your concern. Everything is fine here--I have been involved in a major project that has taken all my time. When that is completed, I will pick up posting again--maybe another week or so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As much as I believe in sticking rigorously to the scriptures that we have, I still cannot reject the evidence that our Masoretic sourced Bibles may have errors in some verses.

    One example is that the Septuagint, Josephus and Samaritan versions of the Old Testament [three witnesses] have the ages at the birth of their son of six of the post flood patriarchs EXACTLY one hundred years longer than our Bibles today. And one other post flood patriarch 50 years longer. This EXACT difference looks like a deliberate alternation one way or the other.

    The Bible says that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word shall be established. So here we have three witnesses that the original version of the book of Genesis included these 100 year longer dates. How can someone honestly reject these three witnesses without full consideration?

    And these different ages drastically alter the time line after the flood. Shem did not live to be a contemporary of Abraham in a very distorted lifespan. Instead, Shem and all of these post flood patriarchw died before their sons died. With of course a few exceptions a father will always die before his son in the Bible and in all history, so this is more believable.

    So with the Septuagint, Josephus, and Samaritan (and actually other ancient writings) timeline the flood occurred around 3200 BC. And the tower of Babel construction occurred around 2700 BC – five hundred years later. Compare that to our present Bible flood date of aprox 2344 and tower of Babel construction around 2077 BC or 267 years later. The problem with 267 years is that it is simply not long enough for a large enough population to arise from the 8 that left the ark to build the tower of Babel. At a population growth rate of 3.0 which is extremely high, that gives only 13380 people in 276 years. Atheists use this fact as an evidence that the Bible cannot be believed-- and they are justified in that particular issue.

    ReplyDelete
  6. George Washington, whay you said is true but I can't reconcile it with D&C 77:7 that the time of the earth is divided into 1000 year periods. By pushing the flood back you end up with Adam cast out of the garden at 4600bc. That violates the d&c. Have you figured out the discrepancy? I think it fits better the earlier date but don't know the answer to the D&C77:7.

    ReplyDelete