He arrives at a very short distance (no miles given) from the land of First Inheritance (Lehi’s landing site) to the City of Nephi stating that Nephi’s flight was of “many days.” He then measures the City of Nephi to the City of Zarahemla as 180 miles citing Alma’s 21+ day journey, and Ammon’s forty days. However, Alma’s journey was 21 days from the Waters of Mormon to the Land of Zarahemla—it doesn’t state the City of Zarahemla—and Ammon’s 40 days was “wandering” which means to travel without a certain course. Neither of these two examples are particularly helpful.
As an example, when Zeniff and his group traveled from Zarahemla to the City of Lehi-Nephi in the Land of Nephi, they “wandered” in the wilderness for forty days (Mosiah 7:4). When his grandson, Limhi, and the Nephites escaped and fled to Zarahemla, “after being many days in the wilderness they arrived in the land of Zarahemla” (Mosiah 22:13)—no length of time is given that is helpful for either direction.
The only possible distance shown by days is when Alma left from near the city of Nephi and reached the Land of Zarahemla. As stated: “From the borders of the land, from a place called the waters and forest of Mormon, some distance from the city of Nephi, Alma and his 450 converts fled with their tents and their families before the armies of the king” (Mosiah 18:30-35). They traveled eight days in the wilderness (Mosiah 23:3) and settled in a land “they called the land of Helam” (Mosiah 23:19). They eventually left and traveled all day in the wilderness and stopped in a valley, calling it Alma (Mosiah 24:20). They left there immediately and traveled 12 days in the wilderness and “they arrived in the land of Zarahemla” (Mosiah 24:25). Thus, they were 21 days between the Waters of Mormon and the Land of Zarahemla. However, we do not know how far from the city of Nephi lay the Waters of Mormon, or in which direction, nor do we know how far they traveled once in the Land of Zarahemla until they reached the city and Mosiah.

Thus, we cannot draw conclusions from any of this as to set any type of distance whatsoever. To do so is merely an assumption often borne of an interest to limit the distance to a known model of the Land of Promise. So, when Sorenson says it was a land of “limited geography,” he is simply making up his own mind and violates his own stated premise to “approach the textual elements of geography as bias-free as possible.”
(See the next post, “Do We Know Where the Land of Promise is Located-Part VIII,” for more comments on the website quoted above and an understanding of Mormon’s Map)
No comments:
Post a Comment