5. “He concluded that ‘seaworthiness has little to do with size; little ships are often safest’.”
The key word here is “seaworthiness.” It is not the size of the ship we discuss in able to sail into deep ocean, but one that is seaworthy. In his book, Borden writes extensively about a ship needing to be seaworthy. The entire point of earlier writings on this subject is that the ships designed in 600 B.C. and as late as the 1300s A.D., were not seaworthy for deep ocean sailing. Obviously, the ship the Lord designed for Nephi to build would have been—but sailing in 600 B.C. required far more than the frail craft Sorenson continually points out sailed the trade routes from Arabia to China, etc.
6. “Two phenomena have changed attitudes in this regard over the past 50 years. First, many hundreds of persons have crossed the oceans in or on all sorts of craft—log rafts, rubber boats, replicas of Polynesian canoes, rowboats, and, more recently, personal watercraft and sailboards, not to mention numerous kinds of small boats.”
Let’s keep in mind that these boats that cross the oceans, regardless of size, are seaworthy for deep sea sailing. In addition, the “log rafts, canoes, and rowboats” are all drift-voyages. That is, they move only with the winds and currents, not against them. In addition, the “personal watercraft” are motor-driven craft like WaveRunners and Sea-Doos, while “sailboards” are for windsurfing—they move only with the wind.

7. “A second reason for the change in atmosphere, especially among scholars, has been recent recognition that ancient (or, as critics were wont to say, "primitive") sailors ages ago were already making remarkable voyages.”

(See the next post, “Could the Ancients Have Sailed to the Americas? Part II,” for more of Sorenson’s comments compared to the reality of the times)
No comments:
Post a Comment