
What archaeologists find and what they think are two entirely different things. One may “think” there was no iron being mined in an ancient iron deposit area, but that does not change the fact that such a mine existed 2000 years ago. To the contrary, according to publications in 2001 and 2004, there is evidence that the earliest metallurgy in the Americas was practiced in Peru about 900 B.C., and this technology spread into Mesoamerica from South America, after about 900 A.D. Over the intervening centuries a variety of techniques developed, among them alloying, gilding, casting, the lost-wax process, soldering, and filigree work.. According to David and Ruth Whitehouse, “The Peruvians practiced a more advanced technology than those of Mesoamerica in mastery of gold, silver, copper, and alloy metallurgy. Smiths in Peru worked gold, silver, and copper, demonstrating a very fine workmanship.” And according to Cothe A. Burland, “A united separate culture arose on the northern half of the Peruvian coast, and it was within this culture that the use of metals really developed beyond the gold-working of the old cupisnique people.”

Iron, on the other hand, is highly corrosive, and over time does not last, and as useful as Iron was compared to other materials, it had extreme disadvantages. The quality of the tools made from it was highly variable, depending on the region from which the iron ore was taken and the method used to extract the iron. The chemical nature of the changes taking place during the extraction were not understood; in particular, the importance of carbon to the metal's hardness. Practices varied widely in different parts of the world. There is evidence, for example, that the Chinese were able to melt and cast iron implements very early, and that the Japanese produced amazing results with steel in small amounts, as evidenced by heirloom swords dating back centuries. Similar breakthroughs were made in the Middle East and India, but the processes never emerged into Europe, which lacked methods for heating iron to the melting point.
To produce iron, the ancients slowly burned iron ore with wood in a clay-lined oven. The iron separated from the surrounding rock but never quite melted. Instead, it formed a crusty slag, which was removed by hammering. This repeated heating and hammering process mixed oxygen with the iron oxide to produce iron, and removed the carbon from the metal. The result was nearly pure iron, easily shaped with hammers and tongs but too soft to take and keep a good edge. Because the metal was shaped, or wrought, by hammering, it came to be called wrought iron.
The different varieties of iron and steel do not oxidize in dry air, or when wholly immersed in fresh water free from air, but they all rust when exposed to the action of water or moisture and air alternately. And very thin iron, such as used in swords anciently, oxidises more rapidly than thick iron. Thus, finding any iron swords would be a rarity in an area covering several thousands of square miles.
(See the next post, “So-Called Book of Mormon Anachronisms: Metal Swords – Part III,” for the reason why no iron or steel swords have been found in the Western Hemisphere before the arrival of the Spaniards)
Not to nention of iron "fastners" being used to join megalithic stone structures in the Andean region; a technique used by the Egyptians too.
ReplyDelete