In the
previous five posts 21 scripture-based points were outlined to show geographical and
archaeological findings that MUST exist for any location to be considered as
the Book of Mormon Land of Promise. In these following posts are numerous
questions that any honest theorist should ask himself in verifying his beliefs,
or in seeking the correct location for Lehi’s isle of promise!
Therefore,
ALL of these questions in the following posts have to be answered if one is to
believe in a certain location for the Book of Mormon Land of Promise. Each
question has to do with specific information in the scriptural record, and
cannot be ignored or explained away. Either it currently can be shown, or it
can be shown to have existed during the time of the Book of Mormon era.
Question
1: “Where did Lehi land and how did he
get there from Arabia?”
Answer: The
landing site was along the 30º South Latitude in Chile, South America, where
winds and sea currents die down within the Tropic of Capricorn as the winds
move upward, creating great calms on the waters. The wind and sea currents
moving from the Arabian Peninsula move southward, away from land, into the
Arabian Sea, then into the Indian Ocean, curving eastward into the Southern
Ocean which flows south of Australia and New Zealand and either pass through
the Straits of Magellan or curve upward along the South American coast. This
has always been the most direct and
simple way between these two points with wind constantly driving a ship forward
and currents moving in that specific direction. No other area in the Western Hemisphere can easily and directly be
reached from the Arabian Sea by a weather ship “driven forth before the wind.” Certainly not the
Great Lakes, Eastern U.S., Heartland, Caribbean, Central or Mesoamerica, or
Baja California. The Malay Peninsula is the only other proposed location for
the Land of Promise that could be reached from the Arabian Sea without going
against ocean currents and winds.
Question
2: “What was the purpose of the Lord
directing Nephi to build a ship unlike ships made by man of his day? What
difference in the kind of vessel if the voyage was to be along the coast of the
Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean to Indonesia, then island hopping across the
Pacific?”
The types
of ships of Lehi’s day and for centuries afterward was that they employed steering oars, and even later, despite
their greater size and the ability to sail close hauled, their shallow draft
and steering oars gave little resistance to the wind. These ships made a
tremendous amount of leeway (drifting with the wind) and could spend several
days going nowhere, losing to leeway, what progress they made sailing. A record
dated to 1183 A.D. by a ship sailing from Sicily reports passing Crete three times. Needless to say this played
havoc with navigation, and was downright dangerous in close waters.
The
Caravela Redonda sailing ship of the fifteenth century was the forerunner of
all later European sailing ships of exploration
Not
until the fifteenth century with the development of the highly maneuverable caravela redonda, built by the
Portuguese, was a much more stable and flexible rig without the lateen sails,
using square rigging. The first caravelas
mounted square sails on the fore mast, and when this proved successful square
rigged the main mast too. This rigging became very popular and most later carracks adopted the redonda rigging as well. However, in
Lehi’s day, ships (including the Arab, Indonesian and Chinese traders often
used as examples by Mesoamerican Theorists), did not sail into deep water for
three reasons: 1) their ships were not strong enough to withstand the constant
pounding of waves and currents, 2) they were not deep-hulled to withstand
capsizing in heavy seas, and 3) their boats were not only fragile, but carried only one mast with a fixed
square sail that could not overcome the navigational difficulties of Southward
oceanic exploration, as the strong winds, shoals, and ocean currents easily
overwhelmed their abilities. Of course, large lateen sails required far more crew to man than large
square sails did, and were far more dangerous to work in rough seas. Thus, the caravel
was the original pathfinder of European ship design. It was caravels that first
doubled the Cape of Good Hope, and first sailed to the West Indies—but as
voyages of exploration became longer her small size became a liability.
Obviously, the Lord knew that the type of ships of Lehi’s day, nor even the
early European ships of 2000 years later, were not capable of crossing the deep
oceans, thus he showed Nephi how to build a ship that would.
Question
3: “What sea and wind currents would have driven a ship “before the wind” to
this landing site in the Western Hemisphere?”
Answer: The
Arabian Sea to the Indian Ocean to the Southern Ocean and up along the Humboldt
(Peruvian Current) of the Pacific Ocean. This is not only where the winds and
currents directly flow and would have taken a weather ship “driven forth before
the wind,” but it is also the shortest distance and fastest path from Arabia to
the Western Hemisphere.
Lehi’s course from Arabia to the Land
of Promise. Nephi made it clear his ship was “driven forth before the wind,”
and this would be the only course that such was possible, especially to inexperienced
sailors manning a ship none had ever before sailed
Question
4: “What caused the great storm that
turned Lehi’s ship back the way it had come and where would the ship have been
when the storm struck?”
Any great storm in the Arabian Sea would be a
tropical storm being just a few degrees north of the Equator. According to the U.S. Navy’s Joint Typhoon Warning Center,
a tropical storm in the Arabian Sea, called a cyclone, is a storm system with a
closed circulation around a center of low pressure fueled by the heat released
when moist air rises and condenses. The name underscores its origin in the
tropics and their cyclonic nature. Tropical cyclones are distinguished from
other cyclonic storms such as nor’easters and polar lows by the heat mechanism
that fuels them, which makes them "warm core" storm systems. It
should be noted that cyclonic storms originate out to sea, typically about 300
miles north (or south) of the Equator, which would place a storm in the Arabian
Sea about 10º north latitude, in the middle of what is called the Arabian Sea
Gyre, a clockwise movement of water between the Peninsula and the sub-continent
of India, and from there it moves northwesterly towards the Arabian Peninsula,
and inland. However, most tropical cyclones over the past centuries in this
region were in the south of the Indian Ocean, more than 300 miles south of the
Equator. In this area, around the 15º to 20º South Latitude, and ranging from
November to April, the most severe cyclonic storms have occurred—with a peak
period from mid-February to early March. When the storm Nephi described became
so severe, the ship floundered and careened about under the weight of the winds
and high seas, and the gunnels threatened to sink beneath the waves, Laman and
Lemuel and the sons of Ishmael were cowered to such an extent, they eventually untied
Nephi in hopes he might save them. At this point, the storm that “drove them
back upon the waves” was in its fourth day and becoming quite violent. When released, Nephi
prayed, “and after I had prayed the winds did cease, and the storm did cease,
and there was a great calm” (1 Nephi 18:21).
An
example of the storm that struck Lehi’s ship and drove it backward the way it
had come for some four days before Nephi took over once again and guided it
back on course
A
most important fact here is that at this point that storm was moving toward
land as Nephi’s ship was being driven back in the direction from which he had
come. Since ships move bow first, the ship was obviously turned to run before
the storm and head back from whence it had come. It should also be noted that
in the center of the southern Indian Ocean is the South Indian Ocean Gyre,
which moves counter-clockwise. And in the center of this gyre is a low where
storms originate, swirling counter-clockwise in direction, heading back toward
the northwest. Thus, when the ship was sailing to the east of this inner
current, the rebellious brothers took over the ship, but "did not know where to
steer it" and became caught in the center of the storm area, which whirled the
ship around and headed it back the way it had come. Since Nephi writes that their ship was “driven
back upon the waters for the space of three days” (1 Nephi 18:13), and that the
storm lasted into the fourth day (1 Nephi 18:14), it would be impossible for
their ship to have been in coastal waters along the trade routes, as many
Theorists claim, when this storm arose, for their ship would have been dashed
to pieces against the shore—not “driven back” as Nephi tells us. Thus, the Lehi
Colony had to have been deep into the Arabian Sea, and most likely far into the
Indian Ocean when this storm hit—otherwise they would have been run aground as
the storm moved inland.
(See
the next post, “Questions That Have to be Answered
About the Land of Promise – Part II,”
for the continuation of these all-important questions)
No comments:
Post a Comment