There is one criteria and one criteria only for understanding any
claimed location for the Book of Mormon Land of Promise—and that is the Book of
Mormon scriptural record. And the only questions that needs to be asked of any
geographical Theorist is whether or not they actually believe in the Book of
Mormon in its entirety, whether they
accept what is written within all its
531 pages, and agree that the points covered by Nephi, Mormon and others in its
pages regarding what was found and what existed in the Land of Promise have to
exist, or once existed, in any current model (location) under discussion.
The fact is, no matter what else
is used in any discussion, the points from the Book of Mormon have to be included and be the basis of any discussion on the matter.
As an example:
1) Seeds of every kind from
Jerusalem. Seeds in 600 B.C. would have needed to be transplanted in the
same basic ground as Jerusalem—thus the Land of Promise would have to have Desertic Soils of arid climate, shallow,
stony soils, sparse cover, fertile if irrigated; same soil groups, called Brown Soils Soil Group; same basic
temperature, which would be 60º to 70º;
same climate and vegetation zone, which would be a Mediterranean Climate (Mediterranean Scrub), where citrus, olive,
agave, etc., grew; and the same mean annual precipitation, which would be 16” to 24” rainfall. If this does not
exist in the proposed Land of Promise model, then Lehi’s seeds “from Jerusalem”
would not have grown and the Colony would not have survived. Only two such
climates exist in the Western Hemisphere—Southern California and along the 30º
south latitude of Chile, and only the latter has all the matching requirements
of soil, temperature and precipitation.
2) Roads that connected all the Land of
Promise, and so constructed as to still be seen today. Ancient roads of
quality and distance exist only in two places in the Western Hemisphere—the
Andean area of South America, and Central America. The Peruvian roads date back
to the first millennium B.C. and can still be seen, some are still in use
today. In the mid 1500s, the Spanish were amazed at the quality of the roads
and compared them favorably with Roman roads, both of which are still quite
visible today. This obviously suggests that any roads built in Book of Mormon
times would still be noticeable and usable today. If there are no roads, or
clear evidence of such ancient roads, of this caliber in the suggested Land of
Promise today, then it is not the Nephite location.
3) Great cities, magnificent temples, palaces,
synagogues (2 Nephi 5:16; Mosiah 1:2; 11:9-10,13; 19:5; Helaman 3:9; 3 Nephi 9:3-5;
11:1). Since these buildings would have been built of stone—like that of
Jerusalem from which Lehi and his family came, and to which Nephi’s knowledge
of construction, appearance, and function would have been, and the only basis he
would have had to teach his people in how to build buildings, etc. (2 Nephi
5:15)—we should find some ruins of stone buildings in any Land of Promise
location today. There are only two places in the Western Hemisphere that have
such ancient edifices—the Andean area of South America and Central America.
One of hundreds of ancient city complexes found in the Andean Area of South America that date into B.C. times
4) Defensive Walls of stone that ran for miles in a more or less straight line to guard against a southern invasion (Alma 48:8; Helaman 4:7). These stone walls would have been sufficiently strong to deter and contain an advancing army tens of thousands strong, some evidence of such walls surely would be in evidence today. Only one place in the Western Hemisphere has such walls—the Andean Area of South America. In fact, the Great Wall of Peru found by the Shippee-Johnson aerial survey expedition in 1931, extends as far as 50 miles inland from the Pacific coast, and ranged from 12 to 15 feet in height. Other such extensive defensive walls have been found in Peru and Bolivia.
4) Defensive Walls of stone that ran for miles in a more or less straight line to guard against a southern invasion (Alma 48:8; Helaman 4:7). These stone walls would have been sufficiently strong to deter and contain an advancing army tens of thousands strong, some evidence of such walls surely would be in evidence today. Only one place in the Western Hemisphere has such walls—the Andean Area of South America. In fact, the Great Wall of Peru found by the Shippee-Johnson aerial survey expedition in 1931, extends as far as 50 miles inland from the Pacific coast, and ranged from 12 to 15 feet in height. Other such extensive defensive walls have been found in Peru and Bolivia.
5) Walls of stone around
cities, circling the cities “round about” (Alma 48:8) that could be stood upon
(Alma 62:20; Helaman 13:3; 16:1) that were quite high (Alma 62:21-23); and
within a stone’s throw and arrow range (Helaman 16:2). Again, such evidence
of these walls would surely be in evidence today since they would have been
made of stone (you cannot stand on a palisade wall of timbers). As an example,
one such wall is found surrounding the ancient city of Kuelap in the Andean
area of South America, with a stone wall surrounding 400 buildings, 2000 feet
long, 10 feet wide, and stands 62 feet in height—obviously built for defense.
Kuelap Walls that
surround the entire city—one of the largest city structures found in the
Western Hemisphere
6) Mountains cast up during the
Savior’s death (3 Nephi 8:10) whose “height is great” (Helaman 14:23).
Obviously, those mountains would be in stark evidence today—any mountain “whose
height is great” would be clearly visible, and far larger and taller than any hills.
We should certainly be talking about mountains between 12,000 and 15,000 feet
high or more to qualify as a “great height.”
The Andes Mountains
in South America run over 4000 miles in length, from 120 to 430 miles wide, and
average 13,000 feet in height; with dozens of peaks over 18,000 feet
7) Two animals as useful to man as the elephant
(Ether 9:19) that would have been unknown in New England in 1829. There are
few animals as useful as elephants, which is a beast of burden—which is a domesticated animal such as a mule,
horse or donkey that is used for carrying and pulling heavy loads. Obviously,
Joseph Smith would have known about such common animals, as well as oxen,
cattle, mules, etc. These two animals, unknown to Joseph Smith in 1829 New
England farm country, would have to be distinctly different, domesticated, and
perform much the same role as those mentioned above. They would obviously not
be bison (buffalo), sloth, or the pig-like peccary, javelin, etc., that have
been suggested by some. In fact, of the list of domesticated or
semi-domesticated animals found in the Western Hemisphere, only the llama and
alpaca fit Ether/Moroni’s description, neither of which would have been known
in the United States in the 1820s.
Llama (Lama glama), indigenous
to the Andean area of South America, is a domesticated camelid,
widely used as a meat and pack animal by Andean cultures since B.C. times
8) Two grains on a par with corn, wheat and
barley (Mosiah 9:9) that would have been unknown in New England in 1829. In
the farmland areas of Joseph Smith’s experience, two grains that would have
been unknown were quinoa and kiwichi, grains of the Andean area of South
America. These grains, especially quinoa, are considered to be a pseudocereal,
grown for its edible seeds, and is extremely high in protein and was of great importance in the diet of
pre-Columbian Andean civilizations, secondary only to the potato and was
followed in importance by maize (corn). No other Western Hemisphere grain but
these two fit the description and importance as is stated for neas and shuem that would have been unknown to farmers of Joseph Smith’s
time and location.
Quinoa
(the name is derived from the Spanish spelling of the Indian Quechua name kinwa or occasionally
"Qin-wah") originated in the Andean region of Peru, where it was
successfully domesticated 4,000 years ago for human consumption, having been
domesticated from wild populations of Chenopodium quinoa
(See the next post, “What is the Basis
for the Land of Promise? Part II,” for more of the basis to determine the
present location of the Book of Mormon Land of Promise based first, on the
scriptural record)
BOOK OF MORMON CONFIRMATIONS IN SOUTH AMERICA - PART I
ReplyDeleteNow here are a couple of things that bolster your wrong-headed notion that the Nephites colonized Chile and Peru. First is absolute science and verifiable and reliable history. It's chickens.
In 2007, American archaeologist Alice Storey and colleagues identified chicken bones at the site of El Arenal on the Arauco Peninsula on Chile's coast. C14 dating place the bones hundreds of years before the arrival the the first Europeans. In Mitochondrial DNA sequences was obtained for 12 of the 37 ancient samples and identified markers identical to Polynesian and Southeast Asian chickens. Could it be that Lehi picked up chickens in his travels and brought chickens with them to Chile.
Here is something else. The only places in the Western Hemisphere that Book of Mormon names for landmarks and towns dating to ancient times is South America. In northern South America, there is a Rio Moron in a land of Moron and a city of Moron on the Caribbean coast of Venezuela. The Book of Mormon says that the city of Moron was by the sea. There also are the Arroyo de Mormon (Stream of Mormon) and the Rio Moroni, which has its headwaters on the Guyana Plateau. There are dozens of other Book of Mormon names scattered around Colombia and Venezuela.
My experience in Venezuela, Colombia and Panama include my two years in the Central American Mission (1966-1968) and as a cooperating entomologist with Texas A&M's cooperative projects with USDA's Foreign Agirculture Service. I have come to know these countries and their agriculture well, not to mention Peru, where I worked with farmers from Nazca to Piura. But not in the Andes, where wheat, barley, corn and cotton (Gossypium barbadense) do not grow.
In Venezuela there is a narrow neck of land that runs north and south connecting the mainland to a huge, desolate desert peninsula that is so hot and dry with soils so salty that agriculture is impossible. The narrow neck of land is the Isthmus of Médanos, and the peninsula is the Peninsula de Paraguaná (Desolation in the extinct Mariche indigenous language). The peninsula and its connecting isthmus are part of the Venezuelan semi-arid coastal state of Falcon.
About 87 kilometers south of the isthmus, is a narrow strip of mountain wilderness composed of the northern limit of the Andes with summits above 5,182 m (17,000 ft). South of the Andean wilderness is a plain extending from Venezuela into Colombia. It presently produces most of the corn, rice and cereal grains in Venezuela and Colombia.
In colonial times Venezuela shipped more than 1,700,000 quintals of wheat from this region to Mexico. Today, Venezuelan farmers in this area produce no wheat or barley but 700 thousand tons of corn (Zea mays) and 170 thousand tons of rice. This region is known as the "bread basket" of Venezuela. On the Colombian side of the border, farmers produce 1.18 million tons of corn, 20 thousnd tons of barley, and 4.4 thousand tons of wheat. These Nephite crops yield well in this part of South America.
BOOK OF MORMON CONFIRMATIONS IN SOUTH AMERICA - PART II
ReplyDeleteNow here is another things that may bolster your wrong-headed notion that the Nephites colonized Chile and Peru.
About five kilometers inland from the island of Molatupu in the autonomous Guna Yala Comarca in the San Blas Islands of Panama is a broad plain once called Acla (Place of Bones) in the extinct Cueva indigenous language. In the north end of the plain is a 150 meter tall hill. It is small compared to the nearby mountains. Beneath the soil and occasionally on the soil surface, thousands of human bones extend for as far as the eye can see.
Five-hundred years ago, Balboa passed across this plain on his expedition to the Pacific side of the isthmus. He recorded that skulls and other parts of human skeletons filled the plain. The Cueva tribesmen with his expedition across the isthmus explained that the name "Acla" comes from the large number of human bones strewn about the plain, which supposedly came from a time when two mighty nations destroyed each other in a great battle of mutual annihilation.
After establishing the his capital at Acla and beheading Balboa, the Spanish governor Pedro Arias de Ávila, exterminated the Cueva people, who were entirely extinct by 1535. After this the Cuna people migrated north into the vacant Cueva territory after Davila moved his capital further north to Panama City. The Cuna presently occupy this region in a self governing autonomous region.
Although I do not agree that Lehi landed on the Pacific coast of Chile or Peru, these evidences of Book of Mormon people in South America give me some pause in my belief that the lands of the Nephites were in Central America, not necessarily Mexico.