Using strictly the scriptures, I
would like to ask the following questions in this three-part series of Hugh B.
Nibley (far left) and John L. Sorenson (left), both of which have written
extensively about other people in the Land of Promise along with those main
lines mentioned in the scriptural record.
The question to ask
is quite simple and strictly scripturally based:
20. “Where did the other people come from and why is there
absolutely no mention, suggestion or even hint of them in the scriptural record
you claim co-existed in the Land of Promise along with the Jaredites, Nephites,
Mulekites and Lamanites?”
First, Nibley and
Sorenson, as well as John Clark and numerous other Mesoamerican Theorists have
for several years been claiming that other people occupied the Land of Promise,
despite the fact that none are mentioned at any time over a 2500 year period
from the Jaredites to the Lamanites.
Second, without a
single mention or any scriptural evidence whatever, these theorists are rock
solid in their belief and promotion of other peoples in the Land of Promise
other than the Jaredites, Nephites, Mulekites and Lamanites.
The Flood of Noah as recorded in Genesis and
the Book of Moses in the Pearl of Great Price. Both records bear witness that
the Flood occurred and date it to 2344 B.C.
Third, who these
"other" people were is not known, other than through sketchy and questionable Mesoamerican
history and archaeological claims, many stretching back before the Flood as
though the Flood never occurred.
Fourth, yet, despite
all this effort to convince us that others existed, Mormon, who had all the
records of the Nephites, as evidenced by his comment: “And now, I speak
somewhat concerning that which I have written; for after I had made an
abridgment from the plates of Nephi, down to the reign of this king Benjamin,
of whom Amaleki spake, I searched among the records which had been delivered
into my hands, and I found these plates, which contained this small account
of the prophets, from Jacob down to the reign of this king Benjamin, and also
many of the words of Nephi” (Words of Mormon 1:3, emphasis mine), not one word
is written or implied that there were any other people in the Land of Promise.
Fifth, the Nephites
spread through the entire land of promise, from the sea south to the sea north,
from the sea east to the sea west (Helaman 3:8), yet not one word of
encountering any other people in the entire Land of Promise, which they filled
from sea to sea.
Sixth, in addition,
the Nephites were involved in building of ships and in shipping (Helaman 3:14),
obviously they would have been involved in such areas as trade and shipping of
goods (Helaman 3:10), and would have encountered anyone else in the land. Yet,
not one word is mentioned in any way to even hint at such a possibility.
Seventh, there is
simply no way for anyone to claim such a monumental event as having untold
numbers of other people in the land and around the Nephites that went
unmentioned.
Eighth, the Jaredites
were driven back and forth upon the entire Land Northward, fighting battles of
extermination, leaving bodies of men, women and children strewn across the
entire land (Ether 14:22), yet not a word is mentioned about any other people
in their land northward.
Ninth, Mormon,
himself, was involved in fighting battles and gathering everyone into his army
from the Land of Zarahemla to the Land of Many Waters in the far north, yet not
one word about any other people.
Tenth, Sorenson, in
his book An American Setting for the Book
of Mormon, and subsequent writings, disparages the Nephite prophets,
calling them scribes and record keepers, and claiming they had no interest in
anyone else other than their Nephite nation, and ignored all the other people
in the land, etc.; however, in speaking of the prophets of the Nephite period,
the Lord said: “Yes, and this was their faith—that my gospel, which I gave unto
them that they might preach in their days, might come unto their brethren the Lamanites,
and also all that had become Lamanites because of their dissensions. Now this
is not all—their faith in their prayers was that this gospel should be made
known also, if it were possible that other nations should possesses this land;
and thus they did leave a blessing upon this land in their prayers, that
whosoever should believe in this gospel in this land might have eternal life;
yea, that it might be free unto all of whatsoever nation, kindred, tongue, or
people they may be” (D&C 10:48-51). Prophets, after all, are called of God, are inspired in their
writing, sometimes constrained from writing more than the Lord wants, and have
been remarkable and spiritual men down through the ages. To think that they would ignore any other people in the land is without merit.
Eleventh, these Nephite prophets did not
mention any other people living in the Land of Promise during their period,
and, in fact, the Lord makes it clear that they prayed that, “if it were
possible that other nations should possesses this land…” obviously, not knowing
if other people would be involved in this land and if they would be a nation, a
people, a kindred, or a tongue, for the Lord said “of whatsoever nation,
kindred, tongue, or people they may be…” and that the concern of these prophets
was for their enemies, the Lamanites, and surely, if they prayed for God to
bless their enemies who wanted to kill and annihilate them, would they not also
have extended their request to the Lord to bless all those Nibley and Sorenson
claimed were upon the land that were not Nephites or Lamanites?
So the questions is
asked again, “Where did the other people
come from and why is there absolutely no mention, suggestion or even hint of
them in the scriptural record you claim co-existed in the Land of Promise along
with the Jaredites, Nephites, Mulekites and Lamanites?”
(See the next post, Questions I Would Like to Ask –
Part XX-B, for more on this question)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment