Continuing from the last post
with the many descriptions written about the Land of Promise by those who lived
out their lives there and knew it so well, and specifically Nephi’s descriptions
of their setting sail in the ship he built.
The last post ended with a
discussion about the impossibility of sailing eastward against the monsoon
winds and currents that blow off the southern Arabian coast, and how these monsoon winds
and currents blow off the Asian mainland across India, the Bay of Bengal and
Indonesia. Also on how sailing ships in the early 1500s could not sail eastward
across the Pacific and the failure of Cortes’ ships sent under the command of
Saavedra could not return to Mexico from Indonesia—the exact course Sorenson
and others claim Lehi took.
Saavedra could not return to Mexico from Indonesia after being
sent there by Cortes because of the opposition of the winds in the Pacific. He
not only was killed trying, but his ship had to sail in the opposite direction--west--and across the
Atlantic to return to Mexico
Here we continue with the last
post by stating that the point of this is that Mesoamericanists,
like John L. Sorenson, can claim Lehi sailed in that direction (east through
Indonesia and across the Pacific), but the monsoon winds would have kept him
from reaching Indonesia, and if for some reason he was able to get there, the
same winds that stopped Saavedra from returning back across the Pacific would
have kept Lehi from reaching the Americas as well. All of this merely
illustrates the reality and folly of trying to trace a desired course across a
map. The point is,
these monsoons create such strong weather and wind patterns that no sailing
ship dependent upon the wind would be capable of sailing against them in any
way, especially in 600 B.C., and even more espeically by an inexperienced crew who had never before been
to sea.
Thus it is evident that the only course
Lehi’s ship could have taken was southward off the Arabian coast--in the direction the winds blow. Such
limitation for sailing ships persisted clear up to at least the 12th
century, when braces began to be added to turn the yard in the horizontal plane,
so the sails could be adjusted to take advantage of the wind when not blowing
directly from the stern. This allowed for “tacking” (sailing into the wind--a fete in early sailing ships that took a great deal of skill) or “jibing”
(sailing away from the wind), freeing ships from being dependent on a following
wind, and allowing them to head up to 90º into the wind. That is they could sail
“close hauled” to the wind—10º to the right (starboard) or left (port) of the
wind when it was blowing from the direction the ship’s path or course.
A two masted vessel tacking (into the wind) and jibing (running away
from the wind). Top: The pink area is the “no go” zone, the direction where no
sailing is possible even tacking—it is “too close to the wind.” Close-hauled,
10º right or left of the wind is the best that can be done, and that takes a
very experienced sailor; Bottom: when tacking into the wind, the ship runs a
zig-zag course from a port tack to a starboard tack, etc., which results in
traveling almost twice the distance
Since Nephi describes his ship as
“driven forth before the wind,” he was operating with a fixed sail, like those
of the early 14th century (the Cog, Redonda, etc.), which were
subject to the direction of the wind, and sailed with the wind behind them (“running
with the wind”). This was the earliest ship sail design (13th and
14th century) and had a square or rectangular sail, held in place
with a horizontal spar (the “yard”) and attached to the mast in a fixed
position.
Full-rigged sailing ships during the Age of Sail “running with the wind” shown here coming
directly at you when the wind was in your face. On a fixed-sail sailing ship
that is the only course it could take
At the time, square-rigged sails had the advantage of providing
stability on large ships and in heavy seas, and they remained the main type of
sail on European vessels until the last days of sail. This caused ships to sail
the winds and currents until steam engines were invented and ships were finally
free to move upon the waters in any direction and at any time they chose.
This leaves Lehi’s ship with two alternative directions to take in order to
reach the Western Hemisphere and the Americas. He could travel with the winds
and currents into the Southern Ocean and head east, or he could have entered
the Aguihas Current south of Madagascar and headed west for the cape of Africa to attempt a westward course around the Cape and across the Atlantic.
However, this latter course, that Meldrum and other Heartland and Great Lakes
Theorists claim Lehi took, has two distinct disadvantages: 1) the currents around the
cape are difficult at best, and disastrous for a sailing ship at worst—it was
not called during the Age of Sailing the “graveyard of ships” for nothing; and
2) as stated earlier in these posts, Lehi landed on the west coast of the Land of Promise and that Land of Promise was an
isle in the midst of the sea (2 Nephi 10:20).
The West Coast.
The latter problem alone should disqualify any idea
of Lehi heading into the Atlantic. However, let’s look at the difficulty of
trying to round the Cape of Agulhas, the southern most point of Africa and the
dividing line between the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, a point about 90 miles
east of the Cape of Good Hope.
The
Cape of Good Hope (green arrow) and the Cape of Aguilhas (red arrows) where two
oceans meet (white circle)—it was originally called “Cabo das Tormentas,”
meaning the “Cape of Storms,” where “killer waves” roll out of huge swells
moving northward from the Southern Ocean across the sailing lanes around the
Cape, creating enormous storms, extremely rough waters, eddies and cross-currents
Luis de Camoes in his epic
poem Os Lusiadas (first
printed in 1572) wrote about the Flying Dutchman, a sailing ship crewed by
tormented and damned ghostly sailors who were doomed forever to beat their way
through the adjacent waters without ever succeeding in rounding the headland of
the Cape because of the threatening storm cloud, represented by "Adamastor", the
Spirit of the Cape, the hideous phantom of unearthly pallor, which was a symbol
of the forces of nature Portuguese sailors had to overcome when trying to round
the Cape of Storms. In the 1865 opera L’Africaine
about Vasco da Gama trying to round the Cape, Giacomo Meyerbeer has the slave
Nelusko sing a song about Adamastor while he deliberately steers the ship into
a storm and it sinks. Adamastor appears in numerous writings, including those
of Voltaire, Victor Hugo, Alexandre Dumas, etc., and in works of Phantom of the
Opera, Billy Budd, Le Comte de Monte Cristo, and others.
The
point is, the dangers are extreme where the warm, swift, and strong traveling Agulhas Current reaches its termination
between two subtropical gyres, creating unusual conditions for inter-ocean
exchanges of water kinematic masses and kinetic energy between them, the latter
being the highest fluctuating current in the Southern Ocean, creating huge
mesoscale eddies.
At the same time, the cold Benguela Current moving
up from the south collides with the Agulhas Current, forcing the latter’s
retroflection (turning back on itself). This current has a transport of 100
Sverdrups (1 Sverdrup is equivalent to 1 million cubic metres per second, which
is 264,000,000 U.S. Gallons), and more than twice that of the Kuroshio
Current—it travels at such speed, the momentum of
the current overcomes the vorticity balance holding it to the topography and
the current leaves the shelf. By comparison the Indian-Pacific Ocean
throughfare is 12 Sv, Humboldt (Peruvisn) Current is 18 Sv, Benguela Current 18
Sv, Gulf Stream is 32 Sv, Kuroshio
Current 48 Sv, Antarctic Circumpolar Current (Southern Ocean) 125 Sv,
reaching 135 Sv through the Drake Passage, and the Florida Current at 150 Sv.
Again,
the point of this is to show that while Portuguese sailing ships found their
way around the African cape, it took many years and the loss of many ships—it
is a dangerous route, especially for sailing ships dependent upon the wind and
currents. However, even if Lehi had gone this way, he would not have landed on
the west coast of the Americas, which should eliminate this route entirely from
consideration.
Consequently,
Lehi’s route would have taken him south and then eastward into the Southern
Ocean. This is the only natural flow of ocean currents and winds from the
Indian Ocean because of the spin of the Earth, the flow of the oceans, and the
winds that drive them.
Top:
Black Arrow: Lehi’s course beyond Socotra and past Madagascar; Purple Arrow:
Picks up the Indian Ocean Gyre; Blue Arrow: Enters the Southern Ocean; Green
Arrow: Turns northward on the Humboldt Current; Yellow Arrow: Lands at 30º
south latitude; Red Arrow: The South Pacific Gyre, if ship continues beyond 30º
south latitude, the Peruvian bulge forces it out into the South Pacific Gyre
and back toward Australia
This is a simple course, one determined by the Lord
when he organized the planet and its various land masses, where the currents
and winds have moved the same throughout the history of the Earth. It is the only current of its kind because of the absence of any land masses in its entire circular passage around the earth. Indeed, as
Jacob said, “the Lord has made the sea our path.”
Thus, Nephi’s ship sailed where the winds and
currents took him. And from the Arabian coast that would have been south, into
the Indian Ocean Gyre (pronounced JIGH-er), then southeast with that current and wind force to the
Southern Ocean, which turned the ship to the east in one of the fastest and direct currents on the planet, and picked up the speed of
these high winds (Prevailing Westerlies) and fast seas (West Wind Drift) that
completely circumnavigate the globe. Once reaching the South American
continental shelf and being turned northward up the coast by the Humboldt
(Peruvian) Current where the wind and current slows to almost nothing around
the 30º south latitude and a landing could be achieved. It would have been a
frightening voyage, one that certainly would have cowered Laban, Lemuel and the
sons of Ismael into submission, and resulted in a peaceful, non-eventful voyage
of which Nephi makes no detailed mention and Jacob merely states “the Lord made
the sea our path.”
Once again, if one is going to look for a location
for the Land of Promise, it needs to match the descriptive information found
within the scriptural record left us by Mormon, Nephi, Jacob and others. This
information cannot be ignored, and in this case, the natural conditions of the
winds and ocean currents cannot be disregarded, for when Nephi tells us his
ship was "driven forth before the wind," we need to understand where those winds
blew and what winds blew toward and to the Western Hemisphere from southern
Arabia. And we need to make sure that the ocean currents would have taken a
ship “driven forth before the wind” to the spot of the site one thinks is where
Lehi landed. These two issues are critical. And lastly, that site had to have
been an island in B.C. times.
It is also important to understand, as these past
few posts have shown, one cannot just point to a map and say, “That is where
they landed,” then trace a line on the map and say, “This is how they would
have gotten there.” In reality, one needs to figure out where they traveled,
for Nephi tells us how he traveled and we can look up and study where that
would have taken him. Then, and only then, can we say, “This is where the Land
of Promise is located.”
Unfortunately,
most Theorists do the opposite.
(See
the next post for another of these Land of Promise factors described by Book of
Mormon prophets that should help us to understand where the Land of Promise was
located)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment