Cerro Baúl sits atop a high mesa in southern Peru
Also discovered was at the center of this mountain fortress was the plaza of the sacred stone, an architectural compound built around a large boulder at the center of the summit. Sacred stones were prominent features of Peruvian cosmology, and a similar structure has been uncovered near the Wari site of Pikillacta in the Cuzco region. These stones were the centers of ritual and received offerings of special libations or of sacred items.
The most common architectural form at the capital and other early cities in Peru was an enclosed plaza flanked by impressive stone halls. These halls included residences of governors and wealthy citizens, government offices, and houses for state-held parties that rewarded the loyalty of important subjects. The most interesting of the long halls that have been excavated so far contained a burnt deposit of classic vessels and keros, some of which were decorated in a hybrid Wari-Tiwanaku style. Six fine necklaces were also recovered from this burnt offering. Each had an average of 970 shell beads, some with a few lapis lazuli or chrysocolla tube beads as well. The evidence suggests the fire that destroyed the hall was intentionally set, and the beautiful ceramic vessels, many of them probably brought more than 500 miles from the Wari capital, were deliberately smashed and thrown into the smoldering flames.
Ruins of Cerro Baúl atop the high mesa
The summit of Cerro Baúl can be divided into western, central, and eastern areas, and has remains of large masonry buildings in all areas, including ruins of conjoined, multistory monumental architecture concentrated in the central and more particularly in the eastern summit area. Other than a low rectangular platform mound (the only such structure at the site) and some associated terraces in the west, and occasional out-buildings in the west-central area, these other summit regions were little developed and have scant occupational refuse.
However, the eastern focus—the area overlooks the sole route of access and the perimeter architecture, now slumped, were defensive, and the structures were built of stone quarried from the rock cap of Cerro Baúl itself, though silt-rich mortar had to be carried up from the irrigated valley below, as did the water used in mixing the mortar.
It is obvious to those who have studied the site that both hill-top summits were clearly built for defense. Some 20 “pitted stone piles” dot the land below and were non-defensive buildings on the flats that were destroyed in antiquity—in fact, it was so complete that no wall, foundation, floor or other architectural elements remained intact.
In fact, the chronicler Garcilaso de la Vega described the mesa as an impregnable natural fortress where local forces defied conquest. The strategic nature of Cerro Baúl is evident in the elaborate fortifications controlling the sole route to the summit. The imperial character of the complex is evident in its spread of more than 10 ha of monumental masonry architecture (William Harris Isbell and Gordon F. McEwan, Huari Administrative Structure: Prehistoric Monumental Architecture and State Government, Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University, 1991, pp131-132).
The long, difficult climb to the top
of Cerro Baúl
Building atop the mesa was a daunting task. Earth for mortar and silt for plaster came from the banks of the Rio Torata, two hours away by foot. Water for mixing those materials was hauled uphill from the El Paso canal. For construction stone, Wari builders turned to the mesa itself, quarrying the western half of the summit so heavily that it resembles a cratered lunar landscape.
Fine masonry construction was restricted to important buildings that adhered to the strict architectural canons of the imperial capital at Ayacucho. D-shaped structures are among the rarest and most distinctive buildings at the political nexus, where they likely were at the sacred center of Wari culture, an area of sacrifice and propitiation of the gods. At Cerro Baúl, we find at least one and possibly two of these temples, in which several fine artifacts were found in a ritual offering. These include entire polychrome ceramic vessels, an engraved gourd bowl, and a silver-alloy foil camelid about an inch across.
When the Wari arrived in the valley, they introduced an agricultural technology of terracing steep slopes and digging long, serpentine canals across the broken land. A 6.2-mile canal wound from the Torata River through the El Paso Divide between Cerro Baúl and Cerro Mejia, where the water course split to irrigate expansive terraces that stair-stepped the flanks of both hills. This high-country irrigation system may be the key to the Wari's successful expansion into the extremely arid Moquegua Sierra, especially during severe droughts.
Along these terraced slopes were the homes of the majority of the center's citizens, situated beneath the impregnable fortress high atop the mesa that, with its sheer walls and single, tortuous route to the top, the citadel defied attack by force (Donna J. Nash and Patrick R. Williams, "Architecture and Power on the Wari–Tiwanaku Frontier,” Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, vol 14, 2004, pp151–174; also see Empire of the Andes).
The adjacent Cerro Mejia, which is more than two square miles in area, shows remains of large buildings, many of them houses, scattered across the summit, which is ringed with boundary walls. The southern slope, facing Cerro Baúl, is divided by large walls into several neighborhoods and each neighborhood has eight to 15 houses built on terraces. The lower portion of Mejía's southern slope was used to grow crops, these fields were watered by a canal, which also supplied the settlement with potable water since it is located away from the river.
The term Cerro Baúl means “hill trunk,” or a place where treasure is kept. Whether or not any treasure was kept there, it was a magnificent hilltop fortress that was completely impregnable and impossible to overcome force. It obviously guarded the entrance to the north and directly into Cuzco.
I was talking to a North America model person the other day and was told that the Nephites did not build with stone. Of course I pointed out the BOM scriptures that say they did. I also pointed to the temple and wall in Jerusalem. I was told that the houses in Jerusslem and surrounding areas were not cut stone. Is there any more evidence in Jerusalem that the ancient Jews were master masons?
ReplyDeleteWhat I find interesting is that members tend to believe that the Nephites were very primitive running around in loin cloths and building stick huts. Whereas 3000 miles away in South America people who were not Israelites were very advanced building with cut stone.
Doesn't make sense to me that people are unable to see the glaring contradiction. Neville, May, Meldrum and others are the best snake oil salesman the Church has ever seen.
I think that the mistake comes whenever somebody claims that the Nephites built exclusively of wood or exclusively with stone. The scriptures are clear that they used both. While many homes may have been primarily of wood, their important buildings were of stone-- temples, fortresses, palaces, fortifications, anything meant to last. That is why even though the people covered the land and had huge cities, what we see now are the foundations and skeletal remains of key buildings and walls. In some places where there was less timber we see smaller groupings of Adobe or stone dwellings.
DeleteWith that said, the North America model lacks any stone structure remains of important buildings and fortifications.
Todd Durrant, That's all true. I was hoping to find some information about Jerusalem specifically because a person I was talking to said they didn't build with stone at that time which is nonsense. The temple and wall was built with stone in Jerusalem.
ReplyDeleteIn-fact Titus when he destroyed the temple started to destroy the wall too. He got down to a stone that weighed many tons and was about 40 feet long as I recall. He couldn't move it and so he stopped at that point.
Anyway, curious about Jerusalem. The idea that the Nephites were a primitive people to me is utter nonsense. The Israelites learned their trade of stone cutting too I think when they were in Egypt. They weren't just mud brick makers. Anyway if anybody has anymore information about this I would be happy to hear it. Thanks