Another Jaredite comment has to do with two animals. Moroni states that “They also had horses, and asses, and there were elephants and cureloms and cumoms; all of which were useful unto man, and more especially the elephants and cureloms and cumoms” (Ether 9:19, emphasis added).
Elephants have
many uses that aided early man, including hauling and carrying
They are also frequently gentle and intelligent enough to be totally trustworthy, though it is always necessary to remember that they are wild and dangerous animals at heart. When dealing with creatures that possess as high a level of understanding and insight, elephants have proved to be most industrious and helpful to man, and are particularly effective as a transport means during hunting because they fit in naturally with other wild animals and they are mightier than many of the predators that humans may face.
In light of this, then, to say that the unknown cureloms and cumoms were as useful to man as the elephant, even more than the horse or ass, is to suggest two animals of high value and domestic use. So what kind of animals could they have been? Sorenson has suggested tapirs and sloths, two animals that, other than for food, have little or no value to man.
African Water Buffalo; Bison
Animals of value to humans need to be docile by nature, lack a tendency to panic and flee, can forage for food around humans, live in crowded enclosures, breed in captivity, reach maturity quickly, and conform to a social hierarchy. Many of the animals that numerous theorists have suggested could be cureloms and cumoms simply would not fit those criteria. In addition, of the few animals that could, would have to have been unknown to Joseph Smith in 1829.
In Meso- and Central America, as an example, such animals as the sloth, anteater, tamandua, capybara, agouti, paca, ocelot, cacomistle, coati, olingo, kinkajou, tayra, peccary, and tapir simply would not be considered beasts of burden or helpful to man, let alone more so than the horse and ass and on a par with the elephant. It seems extremely doubtful that any such animals would have been unknown to Joseph Smith in the Great Lakes and western New York area where Joseph lived and worked as a third or fourth generation farmer.
Nor are there such animals in the heartland or even out west, where some have suggested the buffalo and mountain goat or bighorn sheep, all of which animals Joseph would likely have at least heard about. Nor do any none serve the criteria as being helpful to man other than perhaps the buffalo; however, such animas are certainly not domesticable.
Left:
Llama; Right: Alpaca
Another death knell for Mesoamerica!
In Mormon’s writing, we find two grains that are listed on a par with corn, wheat and barley, that Joseph Smith, a farmer, would not have known about in 1829 New England. We have written about the two highly nutritious grains of quinoa and kiwicha, the two superfood seeds of Andean Peru, many times here. Needless to say, that no such two grains exist in Meso- or Central America, and in fact, most grains from Jerusalem do not grow in that area at all, or if they do, under great difficulty.
Another death knell for Mesoamerica!
There is also a simple statement made in Alma that describes a most important herb that was a life-saver to the Nephites, and would have been most important in any land, but only one land in the entire world grew the herb until at least the 1600s, when the Dutch stole seedlings from Andean Peru and planted them in Indonesia.
That scripture is: “And there were some who died with fevers, which at some seasons of the year were very frequent in the land -- but not so much so with fevers, because of the excellent qualities of the many plants and roots which God had prepared to remove the cause of diseases, to which men were subject by the nature of the climate” (Alma 46:40). To the ancients, the most feared fever that resulted in more deaths than any other malady throughout history was malaria—a problem still facing parts of the world today. And the only cure for malaria is quinine, a natural product from the bark of the cinchona tree, an indigenous plants found only in Andean Peru, South America, until the Dutch transplanted it. It should be noted that there are no such plants or cures in Meso- or Central America, as well as North America, though they have a high incidence of malaria throughout history
Digging of
the Panama Canal
Over a hundred years have elapsed since then and it is hard not to think of the Panama Canal as a metaphor for Mesoamerica’s new dream: the possibility of putting an end to malaria, a disease that has claimed the lives of thousands of human beings, drags down economies and hampers progress throughout an area that stretches from Panama to northern Mexico. Today, at the beginning of the 21st century, the poorest region in the hemisphere is taking on a challenge that has so far only been overcome in the world's most developed countries. This is a challenge that transcends the region’s borders and can only be achieved through a combination of health diplomacy and international political commitment. Though there has been a 60% drop in malaria cases since 2000, there were still 427,000 cases reported in 2013 in Mesoamerica. An interesting problem when one considers the last part of the above scripture: “…but not so much so with fevers, because of the excellent qualities of the many plants and roots which God had prepared to remove the cause of diseases, to which men were subject by the nature of the climate.”
Bark of a
cinchona tree was first dried, then ground to a fine powder,
and finally mixed into a liquid before being drunk. In 1820, quinine was extracted from the bark, isolated and named by Pierre Joseph
Pelletier and Joseph Caventou
There are, of course, numerous herbs and plants throughout the world that were used by groups in antiquity (as well as today) for medicinal purposes. However, there was only one plant before modern synthetics that cured deadly fever as Mormon describes, and that was quinine from the cinchona (quina-quina) tree, as well as all 23 species of trees and shrubs, found only in Andean South America.
Another death knell for Mesoamerica!
With so many scriptural references countering the claims of Mesoamericanists, it is a wonder that any can still, in good conscience, support this inaccurate and erroneous model for the location of the Land of Promise.
No comments:
Post a Comment