Continuing
from the last post on the fortress of Paramonga and the Moche culture,
including those how built it and those who later occupied it:
As was reported in the previous post, the massive adobe
fortress, which may have had religious functions as well as being a military fortress,
is composed of seven defensive walls constructed on a hill overlooking a large
valley. It is still possible to see remnants of the murals admired by Pizarro
when he passed by the fortress in 1533, less than half a century after an
invading Inca army overran the fort in its conquest of the Chimú empire.
The main
portion of Paramonga consists of a high-walled temple atop a hill surrounded by
a large series of defensive walls, and offers a panoramic view of the
surrounding sugarcane fields
Many of the early civilizations of Peru had their administrative and
religious centers close to the Peruvian coast in or near the fertile river
valleys. Since the land between the coast and the Cordillera is part of
one of the Earth's most extreme deserts, it was only from these river valleys
that water could be obtained. Fortaleza de Paramonga, about 125 miles north
of Lima, is on the Pan-American Highway close to the coast and only a stone's
throw from the Río Paramonga. Very little appears to be known about this
spectacular assemblage of adobe bricks. Authors attribute its
construction to the Chimu peoples who dominated much of coastal Peru, but the
site is much older than that.
The four-level
pyramid citadel is located on the Fortaleza river and resembles a European
Fortress because of its powerful walls which were painted red many centuries
ago. It was the scene of a battle between the Inka Army and Chimu warriors in
the 15th century, nearly 2000 years after it was first built.
Because of its formidable construction, it took the size and might of the Inca
army to accomplish this task.
Upper Left:
Entrance into the upper fortress is through a narrow, uphill switchback; Upper
Right: Doorways are double reinforced for barricading against attack; Lower: One
of the many defensive walls surrounding the hilltop fortress stands some twenty
feet in height and would have been impossible to scale
The inner sanctuary of the temple consists of two small
buildings, side by side, oriented so that the sun shone between them only once
a year, on the winter solstice. The wall, in turn, is punctuated with a large,
impressive and probably impenetrable gatehouse. Small storehouses and
residential buildings top the hills surrounding Paramonga's center, but modern
agricultural sugarcane fields bury any other remains of what was once an
important city.
Unfortunately, Paramonga has been badly damaged by vandals
over the last 20 years. It appears to be a local right of passage for kids to
etch their names into the walls of this adobe monument. There is only one spot
left where you can see remains of the elaborate moldings that once adorned its
walls, and almost all traces of the red and yellow paint that covered the
complex as recently as 1985 are now gone.
Some of the deteriorated walls atop the hill
that surround the site. In the distance is a view of some sugarcane fields.
Note the great distance view that the hilltop fortress provides
The massive structure appeared to be entirely of human
construction. It rises from the river flood plane in 5 to 7 tiers
(depends on how and where you count them). The outer facing of the vertical
walls of each tier are made entirely of uniformly sized adobe bricks. The
ones on the top that are most exposed to the elements tend to crumble to dust
when you rub them. If you brush away the finely pulverized sand, which
must be from the crumbling bricks, there is evidence in many places that the
wall were at one time coated with a smooth plaster and painted in bright colors
Left: Looking
through one of the surrounding walls (now fallen in places) up the hillside to
the citadel at the top. Note the uphill climb for any attacking force
When archaeologists
tell us that the Moche culture joined with the Sican culture, and was heavily
influenced by both the Cajamarca culture and the Huari, we might suggest in
turn that these were all the same culture, made up of the remnants of the
different tribes within the Lamanite survivors of the Nephite Wars and later of
their own Civil Wars that lasted many years (Mormon 8:8). There was never any
indication that the Lamanites ever built anything of any significance, having
occupied the structures vacated by the Nephites (Mosiah 7:21), rather than
build anew.
With construction
starting around 500 B.C., according to recent dating, the fortress would have
been about 1000 years old by the time the Moche occupied it, and would have
been beyond the Lamanite ability as shown in the scriptural record. The
buildings, forts, fortresses, temples, etc., found in the Land of Promise were
built by the Nephites, over their thousand year history. Obviously, Nephi
received his building tutelage directly from the Lord (1 Nephi 17:8; 18:1), and
he, in turn, taught his people how to build (2 Nephi 5:15).
There can be no doubt
that this, and the other magnificent structures found in the Andean area, was a
Nephite fortress, with its people described as agriculturally based, with significant accomplishment in
constructing a network of irrigation canals for the diversion of river water to
supply their crops. Their culture was sophisticated; and their artifacts express
their lives, with detailed scenes of hunting, fishing, fighting, sacrifice, and
elaborate ceremonies.
According to
archaeologists, there were eighty-one different cultures in the Andean area
from the beginning of the B.C. period up until the Inca. It is more likely that
those l81 different cultures were merely different stages of development of a
very small amount of people: Jaredites, Nephites, Mulekites, and Lamanites,
with the latter breaking up into various tribes and settling away from one another
after their civil wars, and for the most part, occupying the vast complex of
cities, buildings, temples, and sites that are today seen by various ruins
throughout the Andean area. Unfortunately, this is a view the scholars would
never consider, since it flies in the face of their ages-old beliefs in
infusion, separate culturism, and pre-determined developmental stages. Even
when architectural styles are similar or the same, their tendency is to claim
workers from one of the cultures were pressed into service in building for the
other culture, etc., when the location of the separate structures are not
within the pre-conceived domain of one or the other culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment