In the previous three posts we
have discussed the facts and scriptures surrounding the Nephite building
materials. Every point has been covered, however, to more profitably illustrate
the point, we will cover the comments against Nephite stonework one by one to
discount them and see what is left.
Comment #1: “In the later years of the Nephite Culture there were large cities
and villages in all quarters of the land. The major cities were encircled by
fortified moats or trenches built during the reign of the judges. The people
lived in houses of wood and “cement,” and on a more temporary basis in tents.”
Response: Once the Nephites left the area of first landing,
we have only one record of them living in tents and that is when they did not
have wood to build houses and became “exceedingly expert” in the working of
cement (Helaman 3:7). This was also the time they built cement houses. At no
other time is cement or tents mentioned for Nephite use. The Lamanites lived in
tents in the east and west wilderness before Moroni drove them back to their
own lands (50:7,11) and, evidently, throughout most of their existence (Enos 1:20),
except when they occupied previously Nephite constructed cities and homes
(Mosiah 7:21).
Comment #2: “Nephi
built a temple which was patterned after the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem.
If Solomon's Temple was similar to later temples, it consisted of an
inner building constructed of stone walls, with inner walls, floor and roof of
wood. This smaller building was surrounded by an inner and outer
courtyard where the people assembled, these courtyards were surrounded by a
stone wall.”
Response: Solomon’s Temple was much smaller than that of
Herod, which we see today, and which was not started until 19 B.C. We do not
know exactly what Solomon’s Temple looked like. Nephi patterned his temple after
the one he had seen, called the First Temple, or Solomon’s Temple.
Comment #3: “This
building [Herod’s Temple] in no way resembles any of the Mesoamerican pyramids.”
Response: No, it does not. And Solomon’s Temple likely
didn’t, either. However, we do not know what Nephi’s Temple looked like. It was
certainly not built in Mesoamerica.
Comment #4: “Nephi
states that the workmanship of the his temple was “exceedingly fine”, but it
did not contain as many precious things as that of Solomon’s. (2 Nephi 5:14-17).”
Response: Nephi says that in verse 16. The only precious
things not used were “those not found in the land.” Which does not mean gold,
silver, or whatever “precious ores,” were in the land (2 Nephi 5:15).
Comment #5: “Some of
the cities were walled such as Lehi-Nephi, Shilom and Zarahemla (Mos.9:6-8).”
Response: The scriptural record was never intended to tell
us what every city looked like, its size, how it was built or of what material
it was made. The three cities we know about are mentioned specifically for
other reasons; however, Mormon gives us a specific understanding of what Moroni
built and where: “He erected small forts, walls of stone to encircle them
about, round about their cities and borders of heir lands, yea, all round about
the land” (Alma 48:8).
Comment #6: “Their
cities, dwellings and trade routes were connected by an extensive system of
roads, trails and paths.”
Top Left:
Ancient Roman road; Right: Ancient Greek road; Bottom Left: Ancient road
European country road; Center: Ancient Turkey road; Right: Ancient road in
Spain
Response: And what were these highways made of? You do not
cast up dirt to make a road, but “cast up” some type of material. Note later,
during the extensive earthquakes and destruction in the land, “the highways
were broken up, and the level roads were spoiled” (3 Nephi 8:13). It seems
obviously that stone or paved roads were be “broken up,” and their smoothness
“spoiled,” because they were made of stone.
Comment #7: ”In the
land northward they built with “cement due to a lack of available timber.”
Response: Not all of the ancient stonework in Andean South
America, or even in Central America, was cut and form fitted. We know of that
work because of its rarity and unparalleled engineering fetes required.
However, other stonework was cemented. Two thoughts come to mind about this
scripture. Either there were not sufficient stones around to build in the
manner they were used to, or the stonework they were used to required some type
of forming before applying the cement. It might be of interest to note that
most of the magnificent cement work now used in the vertical or unsupported
construction (tall buildings, freeway suspension, etc.) has to have formwork
built around the cement—and that formwork is almost always wood—which is then
removed after the cement forms. Or stated differently, it is difficult to build
most things without using wood in some manner, and other than forming iron or
steel to replace it, timber is the most used support material available to the
building industry—both anciently and today.
Comment #8: “Many of their cities were destroyed at the time
of Christ’s crucifixion (33 A.D.) being flooded, covered with earth, burned,
etc. The cities of Jacobugath, Laman, Josh, Gad, Kiskumen, and Zarahemla were
burned with fire (which suggests wooden construction) (3 Ne. 9:3, 9-10.)
Many of these cities were later rebuilt."
Stone castles were set afire
throughout the ages. While stone does not burn, the wood framing and supports
do
Response: Contrary to popular belief, stone buildings caught
fire and were destroyed by fire. The reason is simple, very little can be built
without wood framing, timber poles for roofing, etc. Medieval castles were set
afire and destroyed, as was Solomon’s First Temple, the City of Jerusalem, etc.
On the other hand, it is hard to “sink” a wood structure—it generally comes
apart and floats; however, stone cities sink. When a wood city is set fire, it
burns to the ground and is not rebuilt, but cleared and built over. Stone
buildings when set afire, can be rebuilt by reframing.
Comment #9: “From the
record, it appears that the Nephite buildings (both residential and public)
were constructed of wood whenever trees were available.”
Response: This sounds like wishful thinking. As has been
stated here many times, seldom can you build anything without the framing and
support of wood, although today, metal (aluminum) is often used in its place.
In addition, wood has many other values than just framing. It is used for stairs, platforms, overhead exposed beams, small platforms, wall
decoration, access ladders, etc., etc., etc. Where a door frame of wood can be
made in minutes, it take hours to erect stone, or build with cement the same
frame. Obviously, for the work usually reserved for wood, wood would be
preferred. In addition, wood alone limits the size, height, and scope of any
project—especially palaces, temples, and large public buildings.
(See the next post,
“Did the Nephites Build out of Stone? Part V,” for more on the building of the
Jaredites and the Nephites)
No comments:
Post a Comment