In the first three of these
posts we discussed the facts and scriptures surrounding the Nephite building
materials. In the last two posts we have answered the specific statements about
not using stone and clarifying the point. We continue here:
Comment #14: “Moroni's
fortifications during the wars with Amalikiah were principally of earth and
timbers (Alma 50:1-4).”
Response: The account actually begins two chapters earlier,
when Amalickiah first obtains the Lamanite kingdom and began a propaganda
program to convince the Lamanites to go to war against the Nephites (Alma
48:1). With a desire to “overpower the Nephites and bring them into bondage”
(Alma 48:4), he appointed Zoramite captains over the Lamanites because they
were “the most acquainted with the strength of the Nephites, and their places
of resort, and the weakest parts of their cities (Alma 48:5), and moved the
Lamanite camp toward Zarahemla, ready for war (Alma 48:6). However, unknown to
Amalickiah, Moroni had not been idle—he had been preparing the minds of the
Nephites to be faithful to the Lord (Alma 48:7).
In this preparation, Moroni “he had been
strengthening the armies of the Nephites, and erecting small forts, or places
of resort; throwing up banks of earth round about to enclose his armies, and
also building walls of stone to encircle them about, round about their cities
and the borders of their lands; yea, all round about the land” (Alma 48:8). He
also moved his men about, strengthening all places equally, and “thus he did
fortify and strengthen the land which was possessed by the Nephites” (Alm 48:9).
A small hilltop outpost, or resort, of
Huillca Raccay in Peru that overlooks the valley below, to warn of an
approaching enemy force
During
the entire next year, the Nephite defenses kept the Lamanites at bay and little
by little, the Lamanites were defeated in their numerous attempts to capture
one of the Nephite cities. Once the Lamanites fled back to their lands, Moroni
continued to reinforce his earlier efforts. After building walls of stone to encircle them about, round about their
cities and the borders of their lands; yea, all round about the land, he
then set out strengthen individual areas by digging up heaps of earth round about all the cities,
throughout all the land which was possessed by the Nephites. And upon the top
of these ridges of earth he caused that there should be timbers, yea, works of
timbers built up to the height of a man, round about the cities. And he caused
that upon those works of timbers there should be a frame of pickets built upon
the timbers round about; and they were strong and high (Alma 50:1-3).
Obviously, Moroni “left no stone unturned,” as it were in his preparations, and
“Thus Moroni did prepare strongholds against the coming of
their enemies, round about every city in all the land” Alma 50:6).
Comment #15: “Moroni's
fortifications during the wars with Amalikiah were principally of earth and
timbers (Alma 50:1-4). “Although on one occasion he does mention building
"walls of stone" (Alma 48:8) but this seems to have been the
exception.”
Response: Along this line, we are left to wonder what Moroni
used as the foundation for the city named after him (Alma 50:13) since stone or
rock is not mentioned. And we are also left to wonder if Moroni’s armies fired
any arrows back at attacking Lamanites since only throwing stones is mentioned
(Alma 50:5). Also, one might wonder after Mormon mentioned once about Moroni building
walls of stone to encircle them about, round about their cities and the borders
of their lands; yea, all round about the land (Alma 48:8), didn’t bother to mention it
again—do you think it was because it was but an “after thought” or that it was
just “an exception”?
Another
small hilltop outpost fort overlooking the valley below at Pisac, Peru
Comment #16: “John Gee
makes some good points regarding Nephite buildings. "It is a common
trap to assume that because the Maya produced impressive architecture,
beautiful artwork, and intriguing writing they must somehow be connected with
the Nephites. In the Old World, the Egyptians hold a similar position to the
Maya in the New World. By comparison, the Israelites produced less impressive
architecture, cruder artwork, and a less elegant script than the Egyptians;
they did, however, produce the Bible.”
Response: The Egyptians were rather isolated in the Fertile
Crescent, being at its far bottom; however, the Jews were right in the middle
of it, and wanted by both those north, west and south of them and were involved
heavily in maintaining their peace. Also, for many of those years, they were
under tribute to, and paying vast amounts of money to, another foreign power.
Yet, with all the problems they had, including internal civil wars, they built
a Temple that was the envy of much of the world, and an impressive city on a
hill that was a light to all. And, yes, they did produce the Bible, one of the
greatest written works the world as ever known.
Comment: #17: “During
the terrible destruction at the crucifixion of Christ, many of the Nephite
cities were burned. As mentioned earlier, this would suggest wooden
construction.”
Response: No, it suggests that a fire in a stone building
burns the supporting roof structure and the higher floors cave in.
Left: Stone buildings catch fire since
some of their construction is timber, for supports, ceiling, roof, and stairs;
note it is still standing and the stone walls are not on fire; Right: A stone
structure on fire…again, the stone is not on fire, only the wooden support
structures
Comment #18: “The
Nephites may not have been that much different from their Israelite ancestors;
at least evidence indicates this is the case. Nephite architecture, for
example, need not be as elaborate, impressive, or durable as Maya
architecture.”
Response: Since Mesoamerica was not the Land of Promise,
this and following comments seem unnecessary to answer, but we will anyway. The
Maya architecture is impressive, but not as much as that of Andean South
America—it is just better known with more, and less informed, LDS promoters.
Knowledgeable historians and archaeologists who have studied both areas always
write about being more impressed with the Andean area.
Comment #19: “While
the Maya are noted for their limestone-block-over-rubble-core construction with
limestone plaster overlays, building with stone is mentioned only once in the
Book of Mormon and only for city walls (see Alma 48:8).”
Response: Actually, it is mentioned in connection with
defensive walls and positions—something South America is famous for. It might
be of interest to readers to know that neither the term “wood fence” or “wood
fencing,” is anywhere in the scriptural record. Wood is not mentioned at all in
Alma, but the term “frame of pickets built upon the timbers” is found (Alma
50:3), and a “breastwork of timbers” (53:4). The term timber used in
conjunction with walls is used only once (Alma 53:4). Or stated differently, the
term “wood” or “timber” is never used in conjunction with any building anywhere
outside the Land Northward on that one occasion. So exactly what case are we
making here?
(See the next post,
“Did the Nephites Build out of Stone? Part VII,” for more on the building of the
Jaredites and the Nephites)
No comments:
Post a Comment