Sooner or later the
John L. Sorenson’s of the theorists Land of Promise world need to come to grips
with the wordage of the Book of Mormon and its meaning. In this case, what
exactly did Nephi mean when he said his vessel was “driven forth before the wind”?
While we have written
about this several times before, even in this series,
there seems to be a lack of understanding of two points here:
1. Why did Nephi
write that they were “driven forth before
the wind”?
2. Why was it
inserted twice in the scriptural record?
In fact, we might ask
why any particular wordage was inserted into the scriptural record, since
language is often a factor that can be manipulated in several ways. That is,
why did Nephi insert a parenthetical note into his explanation about his father
when he wrote: “For it came to pass in the commencement of the first year of
the reign of Zedekiah, king of Judah, (my
father, Lehi, having dwelt at Jerusalem in all his days); and in that same
year there came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must
repent, or the great city Jerusalem must be destroyed” (1 Nephi 1:4).
Obviously, in the
very beginning, Nephi is telling us a little about his father as well as the
area of Jerusalem. Not only is he saying that there were many prophets who were
prophesying to the people about repentance, but that his father, also, had been
called to go into Jerusalem to prophesy. This tells us four things:
1. Lehi was a prophet;
2. He had been called
of God;
3. The people of
Jesusalem were in need of repenting;
4. Jerusalem was to
be destroyed.
In addition, we learn
from this that Lehi was called, in part, because he lived in the area of
Jerusalem and that the people would have known him.
And if we read
carefully, and not just glance over it, we learn an important fact as well—that
Lehi did not live in Jeruslam, but at Jerusalem.
In this little
understanding, we also can verify why, later, when he was called to flee into
the wilderness, he had such things available to him as tents, donkeys and
seeds—none of which he would have had were he a resident of the city. This also
shows us the consistency of the storyline and the accuracy of the facts
involved.
And we see this not
just once, but twice in the narrative. For a few lines later, Nephi writes:
“And it came to pass that he returned to his own house at Jerusalem” (1 Nephi 1:7,emphasis mine).
Thus in little words
and simple statements we can find deeper meaning and clearer understanding,
which leads us into a more precise insight of what has been written for our
benefit and our comprehension.
So later Nephi tells
us his ship was “driven forth before the wind.” Now we need to understand why
that was inserted into the narrative by Nephi (twice) and for what value—that
is, what should we learn from that insertion.
Driven. This word means to be urged forward
by force; impelled to move. That is, in stating his ship was driven, we are
told that his vessel was impelled (driven forward, urged on, moved by any force
or power, physical or moral).
By the Wind. That is, the wind
was the compelling force that drove his ship forward.
Forth. Means “forward.”
Thus, without
question, we can see that Nephi’s ship was propelled by the wind, i.e., it had
a sail that caught the wind that pushed the ship forward.
In sailing, two
things push a ship forward. The first and most important is a sail catching the
wind. By definition, “driven forth” means the wind was behind them; “Before the
Wind,” means the wind was behind them. That is, the wind was pushing the vessel
forward, not dragging or pulling it forward as it would be when “tacking.”
And the second thing
is that for wind to push a ship forward, the ship has to be moving within the
confines of an sea current, since the wind moves the ocean currents.
Basic wind and sea currents in the Sea of
Arabia and Indian Ocean showing that a ship leaving the southern coast of
Arabia “driven forth before the wind” would be driven south into the Indian
Ocean and then east into the Prevailing Westerlies and the West Wind Drift of
the Southern Ocean
Thus to know where
Nephi’s ship went, one need only know 1) where the winds blew in the area where
he sailed, and 2) where the sea currents flowed in that area.
A ship can drift in a
sea current without wind, however, the larger and heavier the ship, the slower
that movement. Because of this, there are times when ships have been known to
be “dead in the water,” which is because there is no wind moving a current at
that time, and/or the current itself is not sufficient to move the ship.
In certain areas
around the world there are sea areas called “doldrums,” which
is a colloquial expression derived from historical maritime usage, in which it
refers to those parts of the Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean affected by
the Intertropical Convergence Zone, a low-pressure area around the equator
where the prevailing winds are calm.
This is also somewhat true in the maritime areas referred to as the
Tropic of Capricorn and the Tropic of Cancer. The former, in the southern
tropic is the circle of latitude that contains the subsolar point on the
southern solstice, currently at about 23º south latitude (its northern
equivalent is the tropic of Cancer).
At the tropics (Cancer in the north and Capricorn in the south), the winds die down on the surface and air pressure drops as air and wind flows upward in circular fashion and head back toward the equator, leaving "dead calms" along the ocean surface
In
this area is the “calms of Capricorn,” or the “horse latitudes,” 30º to 38º
south latitude, is a ridge of high pressure called the subtropical high, and
receives little precipitation and has variable winds mixed with calm.
The horse latitudes are associated with the subtropical anticyclone and the
large-scale descent of air from high-altitude currents moving toward the poles.
After reaching the earth's surface, this air spreads toward the equator as part
of the prevailing trade winds or toward the poles as part of the westerlies.
The belt in the Northern Hemisphere is sometimes called the "calms of
Cancer" and that in the Southern Hemisphere the "calms of
Capricorn." This often resulted in ships being becalmed in mid-ocean in
this latitude, slowing their progress or voyage.
This also results in
a strange slowing of currents and winds when moving northward on the Humboldt
Current along the central Chilean coast, which would allow a vessel “driven
forth before the wind,” to change a course and steer out of the northerly
currents and make landfall—around 30º south latitude in Chile, an area called
the Bay of Coquimbo and La Serena.
Everyone has sent a piece of wood, small
sailboat, or leaf down such a ditch and watched the current take it some
distance. Such a “voyage” would be called a “drift voyage,” meaning the object
is drifting with the current
The point is, that
when a vessel is “driven forth before the wind,” it is subject to the direction
in which the winds blow and the current moves. Much like a child playing in the
irrigation ditch in front of his house and putting a wood chip (his boat) in
the water as it drifts down the ditch. The wood chip goes exactly where the
current takes it until something blocks its path. A ship, “driven forth before
the wind,” does exactly the same thing. Therefore, one cannot decide
arbitrarily to take Lehi across the Pacific, Indian Ocean or anywhere else
unless the currents and winds went in those exact (not general) directions.
So in answering the
earlier questions, Nephi included this statement for its simple instruction:
1. Why did Nephi write that they were “driven
forth before the wind”? Because his vessel was drifting with the winds and
currents and went where those winds and currents took it. Thus, one can follow
Lehi’s course from where he set sail and where he landed, and in this way know
where the Land of Promise was located.
2. Why was it inserted twice in the scriptural
record? To make sure the future reader understood that at all times, before
and after the storm, the ship was drifting with the winds and currents and went
where they took it.
Thus, we can know
where Lehi sailed and the course of Nephi’s ship, and in so doing, know from where the winds die down and enable moving out of the current, where
he landed and the location of the Land of Promise. Therefore, it is not a
guessing game where one looks at a map and says, “Oh, this is a good course for
Lehi to take,” but to look at the winds and currents and know where Lehi went, or pick a place where one thinks the Land of Promise to be then tries to lay a course for that area contrary to winds and currents, as nearly all theorists have done.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment