The comments dealing with Mesoamerican strengths were listed in the previous posts; continuing below with the Mesoamerican weaknesses and that of the Heartland:
United States production of gold, silver and copper, as well as other
major minerals; Green Circle: Heartland model location; Blue Circle: Great
Lakes model location
Second, the Mississippi Culture, which dates from 800 to 1600 AD, with the largest settlement being Cahokoa, flourishing from the southern shores of the Great Lakes and extending south-southwest into the lower Mississippi Valley and to the southern foot of the Appalachians into what is now the southeastern U.S. (Adam King, “Mississippi Period: Overview,” New Georgia Encyclopedia, 2002). The culture also extended westward through trade to the Rocky Mountains. The only metal of any significance in this entire area was copper (Matthew L. Chastaina, et al., “Metallurgical analysis of copper artifacts from Cahokia,” Journal of Archaeological Science, vol.38, no.7, 2011, pp1727-1736).
Great Lakes: This area within the Great Lakes, extending to northern Michigan, Wisconsin and southern Canada was always rich in copper, and much metallurgy of copper dates to well before the Nephite period. However, this area was bereft of gold and silver, while the Book of Mormon states these precious metals were abundant in the land of Promise.
Gold and silver mining in the U.S. in the early 1900s. Note the
predominant of mines in the west, and not a single silver mine in the east and
only a few gold mines, and none in the Heartland or Great Lakes model areas
2. Directions
The East Sea in the Mesoamerican model is more northeast, and the West Sea (Pacific Ocean) is southward.
Response: As stated earlier, the two seas in the Mesoamerican model are not northeast, but due north (Gulf of Mexico); northeast is the Caribbean Sea, which Sorenson does not name. The other sea is due south (Pacific Ocean). In addition, there are no four seas in Mesoamerica, which the scriptural record clearly states (Helaman 3:8), nor is Mesoamerica an island as Jacob clearly states (2 Nephi 10:20). Further, there is no truly narrow neck of land, the Isthmus of Tehuantepec barely noticeable from a land view in 600 BC, at 135to 144 miles across.
Moreover, the main problem with Mesoamerican directions, and a total disqualifier for this model is the directions of the land itself. Mormon, with his insert on directions, makes it clear that the layout of the Land of Promise is along a northward-southward plane (Alma 22:27-34). In this layout, Mormon states that the Land Southward begins with the Land of First Inheritance, Land of Nephi, Narrow Strip of Wilderness, Land of Zarahemla, Unnamed Land (3 Nephi 3:23), Land of Bountiful, Narrow Neck of Land, Land of Desolation, Land of Many Waters/Land of Cumorah, and the Waters of Ripliancum. All of these lands were along a northward-southward plane as Mormon clearly states. Mesoamerican, on the other hand, is along an east-west plane, to which Sorenson tries to explain away but cannot, as any map clearly shows.
John L. Sorenson’s map of Mesoamerica
as his Land of Promise; this map is used by most Mesoamericanists. Note the
directional indicator in the red circle to the right, showing the direction of
north
Great Lakes: Phyllis Carol Olive’s model of the Great Lakes, has a Narrow Neck of Land as a mere moraine footpath over a marshy, shallow waterway that could be crossed in minutes from one side to the other. In addition, her West Sea South, which is where Lehi landed, and described by Mormon as “on the west in the land of Nephi, in the place of their fathers' first inheritance, and thus bordering along by the seashore” (Alma 22:28).
Top: Phyllis Carol Olive’s map of her
West Sea (Lake Erie), and her “West Sea South,” and lands of Zarahemla and
Nephi Bottom: Showing the land-locked Lake Erie, except for the Niagara River
which flows into Lake Ontario. No ship could have reached Lake Erie under and
circumstances until numerous locks were built in the 1800s, allowing access to
it –yet this is where Lehi is supposed to have landed
Thus, in 600 BC, Lake Erie and Lake Ontario had no access to the sea and no ship could have possibly sailed from the Atlantic to the Great Lakes, as theorists would have us believe. However, facts show that this would have been impossible under any conditions or circumstances. Consequently, Lehi could not have reached Lake Erie by ship, though we are told in the scriptural record that Lehi landed on the sea to the west and south of the Land of Nephi.
South America: As has been reported here many times, it follows completely the north-south orientation of the Land of Promise, from landing along the coast of central Chile, to Nephi’s trek northward to Cuzco, and Mosiah’s further journey northward to Zarahemla; then northward to the Land of Bountiful, the narrow neck at the Gulf of Guayaquil, and all of Ecuador as the Land Northward. In addition, it was once an island, as Jacob mentions and surrounded by seas to the north, south, east and west.
(See the next post, “Comparing Mesoamerican, Heartland, and Andean South American Lands of Promise-Part V,” for more regarding the Deseret News article about the pros and cons of Mesoamerican as opposed to the Heartland models and South America)
No comments:
Post a Comment