The
scriptural record describes a narrow passage: “they did
not head them until they had come to the borders of the land Desolation; and
there they did head them, by the narrow pass which led by the sea into the land
northward, yea, by the sea, on the west and on the east” (Alma 50:34), and
“Moroni also…sent orders unto him that he should fortify the land Bountiful,
and secure the narrow pass which led into the land northward, lest the
Lamanites should obtain that point and should have power to harass them on
every side: (Alma 52:8-9); and “And the Lamanites did give unto us the land
northward, yea, even to the narrow passage which led into the land southward.
And we did give unto the Lamanites all the land southward” (Mormon 2:29); and
“I did cause my people that they should gather themselves together at the land
Desolation, to a city which was in the borders, by the narrow pass which led
into the land southward” (Mormon 3:5).
From this, we know four things:
1. The pass was narrow
2. The pass ran north and south
3. There was a sea on the west and
on the east
4. The pass ran from Bountiful in
the Land Southward, to Desolation in the Land Northward
We can also surmise that the pass was narrow enough to
afford a strategic military position to guard against an army moving from one
land into the other. Lastly, we can understand that the Nephites considered
this pass as a last resort in keeping the Lamanites to the south and not
allowing them into the Land Northward.
However, Peter Covino sees this
quite differently. In his
True Book of Mormon Geography website,
claims that “the reason it was called the Narrow
Passage was because of an inland body of water called the Sea that
Divides the Land.
It is interesting that Covino
creates an inland sea by this narrow pass. First of all, there is no mention of
an inland sea anywhere in the Land of Promise, nor is there any indication of
such by hint, suggestion, intimation or reference.
The fact is, one can show the narrow
neck and the sea that divides the land without creating another, unknown and
unmentioned, body of water, such as an inland sea.
Since the Nephites were on an island, there would have been an East Sea
and a West Sea to either side, however, where the Bay of Guayaquil cut far into
the land, leaving about 30 miles of land between the Bay and the East Sea, the
water could well have been referred to by Mormon as the Sea that Divides the
Land, for surely that is what the Bay of Guayaquil did
The problem in interpreting
scripture is often in a person already being predisposed to think a certain
way. This, then, causes a person to think a scripture is supportive of his idea
when it is not. When Covino thinks inland sea, he sees no problem with the
sentence: ”they built a great city by the narrow neck of land, by the place
where the sea divides the land” (Ether 10:20). This is the only place in the
scriptural record that mentions the sea dividing the land.
The question then is, was the word
sea mentioned prior to the introduction of the word “sea” in Ether 10:20. And
the answer is yes—12 times!
So, when do we use the definite
article “the” and when do we use the indefinite article “a”? An article, by the
way, is like an adjective, which modify nouns. The word “sea” in this case is a
noun, and the word “the,” a definite article, is used in the scriptural
record—thus, “the sea divides the land.” In this case, the definite article
“the” signifies a specific, or aforementioned, sea, and the definite article
“the” signifies a specific, or aforementioned, land. In each of these cases, the
word “the” modifies the noun following (sea, land). To modify in this sense
means “to limit or restrict the meaning of, especially in a grammatical
construction.” Thus, the modifier “the” restricts the meaning of the following
noun—sea—to mean the sea that was aforementioned, or previously introduced.
Said differently, “the sea that
divides the land” is meant to convey that the word “sea” and the word “land”
have been introduced earlier. Had the statement been “a sea that divides the
land,” or “a sea that divides a land,” would be significantly different and
would, in either case, introduce the “sea” for the first time. However, “a” was
not used, but “the” was used. Thus, Ether/Moroni is discussing a sea that is
already understood by the reader. And which sea is it? The sea that surrounded
the land of Promise—that sea over which the Lord guided the Jaredite barges.
Not only did that see make up the North, South, East and West seas, but also
was the “sea that divides the land.”
This is the same type of
understanding of English that allows us to use the (ellipses) in better
understanding the scriptural record. As an example, an ellipses is the omission
of a grammatically required word or phrase that can be inferred. From the ancient
Greek, elleipsis, meaning omission,
it is used to omit from an utterance (by ellipsis) a word
or phrase necessary for a complete syntactical construction but not necessary
for understanding.
As an example,
in Alma 22:27, it is written “Land of Nephi bordered on the sea east and the sea west.”
Thus, we know this land stretched from sea to sea. Yet, in other statements of
this same concept, one or both completed words are omitted:
Alma
22:27: “borders of Manti, by the head of
the river Sidon, running from the east [sea] towards the west [sea]—and thus
were the Lamanites and the Nephites divided”
Alma
22:32-33, “the Nephites had inhabited the land Bountiful, even from the east
[sea] unto the west sea”
Alma
50:8: “And the land of Nephi did run in
a straight course from the east sea to the west [sea]”
Alma
50:34: “they did not head them until they had come to the boarders of the Land
Desolation; and there they did head them, by the narrow pass which led by the
sea into the land northward yea, by the sea, on the west and [the sea] on the
east.”
Helaman
4:7: “And there they did fortify against the Lamanites, from the west sea, even
unto the east [sea]”
It is always helpful to understand what is written before trying to determine its significance to a believed location or model.
It is always helpful to understand what is written before trying to determine its significance to a believed location or model.
No comments:
Post a Comment