The western regions of South America
were simply not a place for American visits, stories of romance, or educational
treatise. What the average individual in the United States knew of the Andean
area of South America in the 1830s was extremely minimal, if anything at all.
As for 30º South Latitude, the port of
Coquimbo was not even known to Americans or Europeans until the copper industry
led to the the area’s notice around 1840, and wasn’t even a town until 1867
when many Europeans and Britishers settled there. The city of La Serena, just
inland from Coquimbo a few miles and the site of Chile’s main agriculture, was
an area of instability throughout the first half of the 19th century,
capped by the Revolution of 1859, engineered by forces from Santiago.
An 1804 Chart of the Coasts of South America from the Equator to Cape
Horn, engraved for Malham’s Naval Gazetteer, Boston, from Malham’s 1795 London edition. Note the blowup, showing
(red) Santiago, (green) Valpraiso, and (blue) Coquimbo. Note the top blowup
which shows nothing unusual or of interest in the Coquimbo area. It is doubtful
Williams would have had such a fine chart of South America, but even if he did,
there is nothing to draw attention to Coquimbo or the 30º South Latitude
As for the route to get to the 30º
South Latitude, first of all, a southern ocean was only first considered to
exist in 1937, but remained unrecognized by the world’s 68 oceanic countries
even as late as 1953, and not named until 2000 by the IHO in its Limits of Oceans and Seas—even then, it
could not be agreed as to its northern boundary with half of the countries
considering 60º South Latitude, 14 countries wanting 50º, but others claiming as
far north as 35º.
Secondly, it was not known until well
into the 20th century that the ocean-area from about latitude 40º
south to the Antarctic Circle had the strongest average winds found anywhere on
Earth, and perfect for driving sailing vessels at high speeds across this
ocean. Nor was it known until the latter half of the 20th century
that this Antarctic Circumpolar Current, with an average depth of 2,600 feet
(compared to a global mean of 436 feet), moves perpetually eastward—chasing and
joining itself along its 13,000-mile length.
Third, not until reports came in from
Australian sailors in the last decades of the 20th century was it
known that despite its southern latitudes, that at certain times of the year
sailing in the Southern Ocean was described as “T-shirt weather in February.”
Nor was it known until David Lewis accomplished it in 1973, that sailing in the
southern ocean without compass, chronometer or sextant, and moving solely by
the stars was easily possible.
Fourth, not until the southern ocean
was conquered in the last half of the 20th century by small sailing
vessels was it known that constant passage of rain clouds, windholes, and
storms provide more than adequate amounts of capturable drinking water, though at sea for
weeks on end.
It is not only interesting, but has to
be considered one of the most fascinating predictions of all time, that three
men in Kirtland, Ohio, in the 1830s, considered even the possibility of Lehi’s
ship, driving forth before the wind in 600 B.C., would have taken this Southern
Ocean south of Australia half way around the world to land at the 30º South
Latitude in Chile.
The Book of Mormon was first published
in March of 1830. Surely Sidney Rigdon and Frederick G. Williams would have
read the entire book by 1832, the earliest possible time these men would have
met and such a statement could have been made or written down in a meeting.
Surely, with all the knowledge of the Hill Cumorah and the finding of the
plates there—and most likely, this meeting was after Zions Camp, which took
placein July 1834, had already taken place, in which the story of Zelph, the
white Lamanite who had lived in the Illinois area and about the great prophet
Onandagus, who was known from the Hill
Cumorah, or eastern sea to the Rocky Mountains.
With such
information and experiences at their disposal, why would they even have thought
of South America? What could have prompted them to even consider such a remote
possibility? After all, it wasn’t until late in 1841 that Joseph Smith was
given the book Incidents of Travel in Central America,
Chiapas, and Yucatan, by John L. Stephens, in which he first
knew about ancient ruins in Central America, and likely never did know in his lifetime about the ruins in South America
since most were not even discovered until the 20th century, though
Kuelap was first discovered in 1843 by Juan Crisotomo Nieto, but not photographed and written about until
the 1930s; and Tiwanaku not discovered until the 1850s, with the first drawings
and descriptions written in 1860 by Ephraim George Squier, and the first map
drawn in 1876 by Alphons Stuhbel; and a book containing the first major account
of the ruins along with major photographic documentation not published until
1892 by B. von Grumbkow.
Again, the question has to be asked,
why 30º South Latitude along the Chilean coast?
Today, of course, we know (besides the
major natural indigenous items mentioned in the last post) that the 30º South
Latitude along the Chilean coast is the southern most point of one of the most
advanced and unique civilizations that existed anywhere in the world, and both
the oldest and most advanced civilization in the Americas (Western Hemisphere).
So where did the idea in the 1830s of a 30º South
Latitude landing site along the Chilean coast come from?
No comments:
Post a Comment