Continuing with the list shown
in the last eight posts (and below) of the various scriptural record
descriptions of the Land of Promise and how any model must meet each and every
one of these descriptions listed by Mormon. To make sure there are no partial comments used here, as often found in such lists of other Theorists, we list
the full scripture, the existence or
lack of existence in other models (under “elsewhere”), and the existence in the
Andean South America area under "andes."
A Chart showing 31 major points of the Land of Promise in the
scriptural record, all of which match Andean Peru and how so few other areas
have any or much in the way of these descriptions. Those marked in yellow were
covered in the previous posts
• Scripture: “And it came to pass that we did march
forth to the land of Cumorah, and we did pitch our tents around about the hill
Cumorah; and it was in a land of many waters, rivers, and fountains; and here
we had hope to gain advantage over the Lamanites”
(Mormon 6:4). This land is also found in Limhi’s rescue party “having traveled in a land among many
waters, having discovered a land which was covered with bones of men, and of
beasts, and was also covered with ruins of buildings of every kind, having
discovered a land which had been peopled with a people who were as numerous as
the hosts of Israel” (Molsiah 8:8).
Thus, somewhere in
the far north, in the Land Northward, where the Jaredites lived, battled and
died, is a land of:
1. Many waters
2. Rivers
3. Fountains
We also need to keep
in mind that while Limhi’s expedition that discovered the bones, buildings,
armor, and plates, did not use the word “fountains,” obviously because they
were not familiar with this area, Mormon, who was familiar with it, does use the term "fountains." That is, he knew that the
origination of the water was in this area—something he would have known
obviously being very familiar with the area and choosing it as a battleground
for his beleaguered army as a last resort.
It is also important
that we distinguish between the three nouns Mormon uses. First of all, many
waters would generally be interpreted as lakes, ponds, and pools; second,
rivers would also include streams, rivulet, and brooks; and fountains would be
natural springs, sources of water, rivers, wells, i.e., where a pool, lake or
river begins by water seeping, or being pumped up, from beneath the ground. In Webster’s
1828 dictionary, he defines it as “the spring or fountain from which a stream
of water proceeds, or any collection of water within the earth or upon its
surface, in which a stream originates.” These springs have their sources in
subterranean ponds, lakes, or collections of water.
Consequently, to find
an area that can be described as a “land of many waters, rivers and fountains,”
we must have an area where numerous bodies of water exist whose sources are
within these waters that form the lakes, rivers, streams, etc. It cannot be a
collection of water, no matter how large, originating from other sources. We
also should find an area high up in the mountains or at a great elevation where
water sources would be expected to be found.
Elsewhere: While the Great Lakes area is a land of many waters, it
is not a land of source water. That is, according to the Office of the Great Lakes, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality,
the Great Lakes themselves are maintained from the upstream inflow, groundwater,
and surface water runoff, which drain the adjacent land. In addition, heavy
rain in Lake Superior causes a rise in all five great lakes, suggesting a
continual runoff from other sources into the lakes in general. In 2013, because
of low rainfall in the north drainage basin above the lakes, the runoff flow
lowered the five great lakes, especially Michigan and Huron, to record lows,
threatening shippers, carriers and industry, putting the $34-billion Great
Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway shipping industry in peril.
As for the Heartland, there are
no fountains involved in the entire area of their Land of Promise, since their
rivers all have their sources far to the north or west. As for Baja, much of
the entire peninsula depends on wells for water. While the northwest is better
watered with the Tijuana River and the Colorado River floodplain, the Colorado
drains into the Gulf of California (Sea of Cortez). It might also want to be
understood that the southern half of Baja is Mexico’s driest state, and is running
out of water at the present time. In addition, water sources are also running
out along the northern half of Baja. This is a very dry area with no place at
all that could be truthfully designated as a land of many waters.
The east coast of the Malay peninsula
is water-rich, and the peninsular land is drained by a dense network of rivers
and streams, the longest being the Pahang River. Two areas in Malay might
qualify for a land of many waters, however, they are both south of the Kra
Isthmus in the model’s Land Southward, i.e., Khao Sok Ratchaprapha, in the Ban
Ta Khun (amphoe) District, located
in the Surat Thani province; and
another further south covering some six districts along the coast, called Songkhla Lake.
However, these latter waters are
not really lakes, but actually a lagoon complex with a 380-mile-wide strait to
the Gulf of Thailand and, being salt water, not really “many waters” at all,
and opens into the Thale Luang to the
north, a mangrove swamp north of that and a small Thale Noi wetlands reserve beyond. One might even consider two
areas far to the north of there, i.e., Vajiralongkorn
and Sinakharin, but both lie beyond
the Land Northward within the Asia mainland (mainland Thailand), northwest of
Bangkok. The point is, there is no area of “many waters, rivers and fountains”
located in the Land Northward of the Malay model.
Andes: On old maps of Ecuador, there is an area labeled “Land of
Many Waters,” in which there are numerous lakes, rivers, and their sources in
an area to the southwest of Quito, Ecuador, which we have outlined and shown
map diagrams in the past in these posts.
• Scripture: “And
they also had horses, and asses, and there were elephants and cureloms and
cumoms; all of which were useful unto man, and more especially the elephants
and cureloms and cumoms” (Ether 9:19).
We need to keep in
mind that these two animals were 1) unknown to Joseph Smith, a farmer, in the
New England area in the early 1800s; and 2) they were on a par in worth with
the elephant and of more importance and use than the horse and ass (donkey).
Elsewhere: So far in the
world’s Species List, there are no other animals that match Ether’s
description in the entire Western Hemisphere other than the two now known in
Andean South America. Certainly Sorenson’s claim of the sloth and tapir do not
match the descriptions by any means.
Andes: Much has been written about the two animals of great value
to the indigenous people of the Andes in these posts over the years. The Llama (pronounced LAWH-muh) and Alpaca (pronounced El-PACK-uh), have
been shown to be two animals that not only match Ether’s descriptions, but were
unknown in the United States prior to the 20th century, and are the
only two such animals in all the Western Hemisphere. In addition, much has been
written here over the past three years about these two animals, and their wild
predecessors, the guanaco (pronounced
Gwa-NAH-co) and the vicuña (pronounced
Vye-COON-ya).
(See the next post, “Comparing
Various Lands of Promise With the Scriptures – Part X,” for more comparisons
based on the original chart shown at the top of this post and the scriptural
references cited)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment