As stated in the last two posts, Writers and Theorists with a
predetermined answer in mind have a tendency to give only the information that
supports their point of view when citing other work, or even the scriptural
record. This is especially true of John L. Sorenson as he tries so hard to
convince us that the Nephites had their own directional system.
In the previous posts we showed the first part of this deceptive idea
that the Nephites did not use our cardinal compass directions, a fallacious
attempt to sell the idea of Mesoamerica as the Land of Promise, since that area
runs east and west and not north and south as the Land of Promise is described.
We also showed a map of Sorenson’s belief of when Nephi landed, he put
his back to the sea and pointed forward and, using an ancient Hebrew custom, said, that is “east.” However,
since where Lehi landed in Mesoamerica is merely a guess, what if he landed
just a short distance further south. With back to the sea, north would have
been true north.
If Nephi had set foot along
the coast near Cerro El Baúl, a pre-classic site in present-day Escuintia
Department, Guatemala. He would have seen north as we know it today and as
Mormon described it—which, of course, would have put the entire map out of
direction by 90º and made all of Sorenson’s directions wrong
The problem with putting your back to the sea, as we have described in
this blog numerous times, is that coastlines change, especially in
Mesoamerica. Take a trip northward, into the Land Northward, just beyond the
“narrow neck.”
If Mormon put his back
to the sea along Sorenson's “west sea” coast, he would be looking at northwest as his
“east.” Which, if nothing else, would have made the list of Mormon’s directions
inconsistent, which they are not. Mostly, however, it would have completely
disoriented a field commander, fighting battles, and working on strategies if
his “personal directional compass” kept changing with the coastline
One of the things Sorenson seems to misunderstand about his changing
directions is what that effects. Take military campaigns, for instance. Having
been there and done that, it seems totally illogical that a directional system
could be affected by how someone stands along a seacoast. Not having GPS,
satellite photos, aerial reconnaissance, etc., military field commanders in the
time of the Nephites would have been left to arrange their directions simply by
where they were at the time. With back to the sea, any Nephite, Sorenson tells
us, would know which way was east. This, however, is ridiculous when you use
Mesoamerica as a model, since there are coastlines in close proximity that run in various
directions.
If Captain
Moroni, while chasing the tent-dwelling Lamanites out of the East Wilderness
had put his back to the sea, he would have proclaimed that east was really
southeast. And in moving the Lamanites toward the Land of Nephi, according to
Sorenson’s map, he would have really been driving them toward the Land of Zarahemla
One of the absolute necessities in conducting a war where there are
different fronts is to know where you are in relation to your field commanders.
Take, for instance, when Teancum was battling Morianton along the Sea East near
Bountiful (Alma 50:35), and after defeating him, Moroni, who was along the
southern coastline of the Land of Zarahemla battling the Lamanites (Alma
52:11), sends Teancum orders to hold the narrow neck area, he certainly
couldn’t have used directions, since his back at the time was against a sea,
making his “east” really “northeast,” and Teancum’s back was to the Sea East,
making his “east” actually “southeast.”
How difficult
communication would be in the field with two commanders (and no modern
communication devices) basing their
directions on opposite seas with coastlines running in different directions and
trying to set up strategy for battles. Red Arrow: Teancum; Yellow Arrow: Moroni
When Mormon fought his
way across the Land Northward from the “West Sea” to the “East Sea” and then
stopped at Cumorah to finish his record and bury the plates, etc., he would
have put his back to the other sea and now proclaimed that “east” was to the
southwest (not the northwest as before). Seems mighty difficult to run a war
against an enemy and try to communicate with your 22 field captains and tell
them where you are in relation to where they are
Now what if Moroni misunderstood where Teancum was fighting. Or, what if
by the time Moroni received a report and wrote back (considering time of a
runner delivering these two messages), Teancum had moved further along the
coast, from Mulek along the coast toward the narrow neck area (Isthmus of
Tehuantepec), or even chased Morianton through, into the Land Northward. As can
be seen from the map below, his orientation to west would have been as much as
45 to 90º different, depending exactly where he was. Might not this cause great
difficulty in communicating under such important conditions?
With back to the sea,
Teancum could have judged his position and that of Moroni as much as a sweep
from west southwest, through west northwest. In the heat of battle, out in the
field, where few landmarks are available and none of the modern techniques
known, such difficulty in figuring out directions would be a major hindrance to
victory and a definite cause of defeat
Or what about affected Corihah, the Nephite, and Zenan, the Lamanite, during one of
the final battles of the war, when Mormon writes: “many had become hardened,
because of the exceedingly great length of the war; and many were softened
because of their afflictions (Alma 62:41), and Corihah fell beneath Zenan’s sword
along a ridge on the edge of the fighting. Now Mormon tells us that “because of
the prayers of the righteous, they were spared,” and Zenan felt remorse as he
raised his sword for a final kill of the defenseless Nephite. With a change of heart, he inspected the
wounds, carried Corihah into a shallow cave and attended to him. After several
days, a bond was developed, and finally, certain the Nephite would recover, Zenan
told him he had to report back to his people or they would think him dead. As
the Lamanite was about to depart, Corihah told him of a land far to the north,
where he had inherited a track of forest just below the splitting of three
rivers and many feeder streams, and that if they both survived the war, Corihah
offered some of the land to Zenan for sparing his life and nursing him back to
health. Having admired the Nephite’s courage and character during his
recovering, Zenan agreed and Corihah told him that after the war ended to make
his way north toward a narrowing of the land. “I know nothing of ‘north’ or any
narrow land,” Zenan answered truthfully. Corihor then told him to find the sea,
put his back to the ocean, turn right and keep going until he reached a land
anciently called Moron, ask for the location of the three rivers, and then
travel one day downstream of the middle fork.
After the war, when the peace came (Alma 62:42), many people went north
to inherit the Land Northward (Alma 63:9). Corihah was one of those. When he
was fully recovered from Zenan’s care, he made his way back to the city of
Moroni, where he had always lived along the East
Sea coast, just north of the Land of Nephi, and saying goodbye to his
parents, he, like all Nephites, put his back to the ocean, turned right and
headed north. On the other side of
the land, Zenan gathered his wife and two small children, packed his
possessions on his shoulders, and headed for the ocean. When he finally reached
what the Nephites called the West Sea,
he put his back to it, then turned right and headed out, traveling south. The two never did meet again.
Corihah, around the city
of Mornoi (red arrow) put his back to the East Sea and turned right and
traveled into the Land Northward; Zenan, the Lamanite, stood with his back to
the West Sea, turned right, and headed into the Land Southward. Both men
followed the correct directions, but went in opposite directions
So here’s the problem. Sorenson says, that when Nephi landed, he put his
back to the sea and said, that is “east” (ahead of him) and that is “south” (to
his right), and that is “north” (to his left), and that is “west” (behind him).
Then, to avoid the problem pointed out above, from that time forward, no
Nephite ever used that technique again. From then on, they all knew that true
north was “east” even though the sun came up from their “south” after that.
This silliness comes from a man of letters who has taught thousands of 18
to 24 year old students over the years, headed up the Anthropology Department
at BYU, and also the Archaeology Department before it was split off, is currently
a Professor Emeritus from BYU, and considered the “guru of Mesoamerican Land of
Promise thought.”
One has got to wonder about the ridiculousness that has led to the
acceptance of Mesoamerica as the Land of Promise when everywhere you look in
trying to find scriptural matches, the land is barren and very, very few exist.
But the real curious thing is why on earth have so many thousands of people
bought into Mesoamerica when it simply does not follow Mormon’s descriptions of
the land, nor any kind of sanity in common sense?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I've looked all through the references and the name guide and cannot find Corihah or Zenan in the Book of Alma as you wrote.
ReplyDelete"affected" Corihah and Zenan means fictitious. It was a humorous attempt, though sarcastic example, of the silliness of Sorenson's idea about placing one's back to the sea to determine directions. Sorry for the inconvenience.
ReplyDeleteSorenson's "directions" are really a joke. The East sea is only "East" if you reckon from his distant "North." However, if you reckon from where he puts the land of first inheritance, the sea "East" is nearly West! These types of problems arise everywhere. His "rotated" directions only work if you locate the directional epicenter in a certain location. If you locate it to far into the land of Nephi (which is where you'd think the nephites originally would have) everything nearly becomes West not North. The whole thing is preposterous.
ReplyDelete