Continuing with more comments on
our website and our responses:
Comment
#1: “What do you think of John Sorenson’s
belief that the Nephites rode tapirs rather than horses and it was a
mis-identification on the part of the early Spanish?” Brooke E.
Response:
You tell me:
Left: Tapir in Peru (their native home);
Right: A Nephite riding a Tapir
Does this look like
something a horseman, such as the early Spanish, would have mistaken for a man
riding a horse?
Comment #2: “I found this quote among Sorenson’s many
writings: ‘“A
question naturally arises as to whether vessels and nautical skills were
available to account for the early voyages. Contrary to the picture we were
once taught about ‘primitive’ sailors timidly avoiding the open sea until an
intrepid Columbus made a breakthrough, evidence now clearly establishes that
sailors long ago ventured widely. As long ago as 52,000 years ago. Australia's
first settlers reached that continent across as much as 95 miles of open sea, and the Solomon Islands were
populated from 105 miles away by 29,000 years ago. Balsa-log rafts
(functionally they were steerable ‘ships,’ not what we think of under the term rafts) like the Kon-Tiki vessel of Thor Heyerdahl
were preceded by early Ecuadoran craft that sailed up and down the Pacific coast
of South and Middle America apparently from 2000 BC on. However, they, in turn,
were modeled on rafts of unknown age from China and Southeast Asia. Three
modern replicas of pre-Columbian rafts constructed in Ecuador in the
traditional form were sailed in 1974 as a fleet over 9,000 miles to Australia. Many other craft, some of them remarkably small and ‘primitive,' have been sailed in modern times across various ocean routes; one
veteran small-craft sailor reports that ‘it takes a damned fool to sink a boat
on the high seas.’ Wondered if you had seen it and if it has any impact on your
writings about difficulty sailing a ship in 600 B.C.”
Kavan W.
Response: Yes, I have. It comes
from Hannes Lindemann’s Alone at Sea,
edited by J. Stuart (New York 1957). Lindemann, a German doctor, was born in
1922, and was a navigator and sailor, making two solo transatlantic crossings,
one in a sailing dugout canoe, and the other in a 17-foot Klepper canoe Aerius
II, a double folding kayak—a vessel invented in Germany in 1905, with the
Aerius II produced in 1951-1956, which has an integral air chamber inside the
hull, making them virtually unsinkable.
These canoes are durable, stable, highly maneuverable, and quite sturdy. His
singular fete has gone down in history as one of the great sea-going
achievements of all time. But its rarity eliminates any possible example
of Nephi’s voyage to the Land of Promise—one man crossing 3400 miles of the
Atlantic in a canoe is not 40 to 60 people on a ship crossing the Pacific for
about 10,000 miles. While it is understandable for Lindemann to say, “it takes
a damned fool to sink a boat on the high seas” crossing in a one-man unsinkable
kayak, it is quite different to make the same claim about a sailing ship of
some size that is not maneuverable and can be swamped on the high seas. We
might also want to keep in mind that Sorenson continually begins a contrary
thought with the statement, evidence now
clearly establishes, without giving that evidence, or how it has clearly
established anything at all. This is a statement often made in a college
classroom where students are either unwilling or unknowing to ask for details.
Sorenson also has a strong tendency
to quote extremely rare and highly unusual events and occurrences as though
they were common fare—but sailing the Atlantic in a kayak is not common. After
all, according to the Falcon Guide to
Kayaking 2007 edition, in the entire history of boating, only three kayaks
have crossed the Atlantic Ocean—only three!
This event can hardly be used as an example of anything other than courage and
rare achievement.
Nor can we accept the idea of
early sailors “timidly avoiding the empty sea”—I doubt one could have found a
timid early sailor, who went to sea in very small ships. These were sturdy men
of great courage, undaunted by challenge, who spent weeks, months, even years
at sea. However, what they were not was foolish. Nobody knew better than they
that the “empty sea” was a very dangerous place—even experienced mariners
during the Age of Discovery, were careful about going out on the “empty sea” or
what they called “the great deep” or later “the deep blue.” They had stories
about Davey Jones Locker, and believed in sea serpents, the ocean dropping off
the end of the world, and still they went to sea. They knew about scores of
ships that sunk, torn apart by severe storms, ripping sides and bottoms out on
coral reefs or slightly submerged shoals. If records had been kept in those
early days, we would find that thousands of sailors lost their lives in
hundreds of shipwrecks—they didn’t call houses near the shore of early sailing
villages “Widow’s Walk” for no reason. There was nothing timid about early
sailors. Sorenson would do better to talk about things he knows something about
and didn’t just read in a book or somebody’s dissertation or position paper.
While modern man might be timid
to go to sea in such flimsy craft as those early coastal vessels, the ancient
mariner was anything but. However, once again, he was not foolish or
reckless—he knew how deadly the sea could be. These men “who went down to the
sea in ships” knew about descriptive sea terms such as the “Cape of Storms”
(now called the Cape of Good Hope) where scores of ships met their doom trying
to round that Cape before the currents and winds were better understood, and for
a hundred years or more was called “the Sailor’s Graveyard”; an area in the
Ionian Sea was known to Greek sailors as the “Blue Graveyard,” and the wrecks
off Scarborough, Maine, are legend, as were the Dardanelles where scores of
ships were wrecked until seamen came to understand their unique double
currents. Early sailors referred to Drake’s Passage as the “Devil’s Passage,”
and even the Great Lakes had a “Shipwreck Coast” from Grand Marais, Michigan,
to Whitefish Point, and was called “Graveyard of the Great Lakes,” where
hundreds of ships met their doom on the lakes. Only a fool would separate
himself from a view of land, not out of fear, but well understanding that unknown
winds and currents would take him so far off course he might never find his way
back.
Comment #3: “If, as Palmer and
other Mesoamerican theorists suggest, the greater Nephite library of records is
still in Mexico, what storehouse of books did Joseph Smith and Oliver see in
the New York setting that Brigham Young discussed regarding the experience
Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery had when returning the plates to the Hill
Cumorah? It seems to me that one hill is all we get” T.J.
Response: Brigham Young’s
statement was: “The hill opened up and they walked into a cave, in which there
was a large and spacious room. He says he did not think, at the time, whether
they had light of the sun or artificial light; but that it was just as light as
day. They laid the plates on a table; it was a large table that stood in the
room. Under this table there was a pile of plates as much as two feet high, and
there were altogether in this room more plates than probably many wagon loads;
they were piled up on the corners and along the walls…” (Brigham
Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 19, p. 38). This statement tells us
only that there is a cave or “room” wherein are stored tons of sacred records,
presumably of the Nephites. But that “room” could have been anywhere. The Lord
is fully capable of providing a vision for a person in which he feels he is
right there, which vision could have been provided for Joseph and Oliver at the
moment they reached the spot on the hill Cumorah in upstate New York they were
directed to reach. The heavens, or the future, or the past, or any place on
earth can be opened and shown to a person(s) in a vision. Lehi and Nephi saw
the tree of life, river of dirty water, path and iron rod, and a building of
scoffing people—and felt they were upon it, holding to that rod. The Lord is
also capable of moving those plates, table, sword of Laban, from one place to
another—distance is not a matter of concern. The trouble is, man is simply not capable of understanding God or the things of God or how God does things.
No comments:
Post a Comment