Someone asked the
other day about the fact that Mormon stopped retreating in 385 A.D., and
gathered his Nephite army of some 230,000 troops to fight a final, last-ditch
battled with a far superior Lamanite force that even Mormon knew would be the “last
struggle of my people.” His query surrounded why Mormon just didn’t continue to
retreat northward?
He wanted to know that if the land mass was the same in 385 A.D.
as it is today, why did they not continue to flee from the Lamanites to the
north, or to the east? Were they still landlocked by the surrounding sea? In
Mormon 6:15, Mormon says there were a few who survived “who had escaped into
the south countries,” but why go south back into the land of the Lamanites
rather than north or east away from them? In Mormon 8:2 we read that the Nephites
who escaped to the south were captured by the Lamanites and killed. Again, were
they landlocked so there was no other means of escape?
Mormon retreated with his army to the Land
of Cumorah where he hoped to gain some advantage over the Lamanites (Mormon
6:4), yet knew it would be the last struggle for the Nephites (Mormon 6:6)
This is a concern
many have asked over the years of this blog since it doesn’t stand to reason
that Mormon would stop and fight a battle he couldn’t win if there were
alternatives. Consider that Mormon and the Nephites had been retreating for
several years since Mormon was only 15 years of age and hostilities broke out
in 326 A.D. During the next twenty-four years of constant wars, the Nephites
were driven deeper into their lands to the north and retreated to the Land
Northward where they they stopped the Lamanite advance with a stunning victory
over 50,000 with their smaller army of 30,000 (Mormon 2:25). There they agreed
to a treaty that divided their lands (Mormon 2:28) between the Land Northward
and the land Southward.
Yet the wars
continued after a ten year peace and went on for the next 25 years as Mormon first
defended (Mormon 3:6-7), then retreated from the Land of Desolation (Mormon
4:19-20), losing battles (Mormon 4:21), and fleeing through towns and villages,
taking the inhabitants with them (Mormon 4:22) as they retreated in haste. The
Lamanites swept across the land, burning everything Nephite (Mormon 5:5) until
the Nephites dug in for a time and stopped the Lamanite invasion (Mormon 5:6).
In the end, however, the huge numbers of Lamanites succeeded in driving the
Nephites (Mormon 5:7), who continually retreated (Mormon 6:1), until Mormon
decided to make his last stand at Cumorah (Mormon 6:6), in a battle that Mormon
knew “to be the last struggle of my people.” In fact, the greatness of the
Lamanite numbers “filled every Nephite soul with terror” (Mormon 6:8) as the
Lamanites approached Cumorah.
Certainly there was plenty of area in which
to retreat to the north for Mormon’s army, with their women and children in a Mesoamerican land of promise, so
why stand against a superior force and die when escape was available?
The inevitable
question is: “Why didn’t Mormon and the Nephites continue to retreat northward
with their families? Mesoamerican guru John L. Sorenson of BYU in his
book An Ancient American Setting for the
Book of Mormon, claims the reason Mormon and the Nephites did not retreat
further north (into Mexico, etc.) was because all the best lands were already
taken and that they were not really familiar with that land. An odd comment, when most men
would opt to save their families and themselves from certain death if a way was
available, even if a retreat was not into the most desirable land area.
The problem lies in the Mesoamerican Theorist trying to
answer this difficult question for them since their model land mass of
Mesoamerica continues numerous land to the northward for thousands of miles through Mexico and into
the United States (and Canada), and southward for thousand of miles (clear to
the end of South America). With such a model, there is no logic in Mormon
stopping to fight a battle he knew he could not win (Mormon 6:6), so the
Theorists typically ignore the question, or come up with such a feeble answer
as did Sorenson.
The same is true in all U.S. Land of Promise locations,
i.e., Great Lakes (north into Canada); Western New York (north into Canada); eastern
U.S. (north into Canada); Heartland (north into northern U.S.), Baja California
(north into U.S.); Malay (north into Thailand, Myanmar and Asia). This is the
reason none of these Theorists ever talk about this issue, because in all their
models, an escape route existed—so why not take it? And no reasonable answer is
possible for them. And if not Mormon and his generals, why not those who did
escape going north, instead of south into the heart of the enemy lands?
The answer lies in the fact that Mormon had nowhere to go.
Cumorah in the Land of Many Waters, considered the most northern area of the
Land Northward (Alma 22:30), was as far as the Nephites could retreat. Beyond that area
had been the Sea North, the Ripliancum Sea of the Jaredites, the boundary of
the isle Jacob described (2 Nephi 10:20). Then, when the mountains came up
“whose height is great” (Helaman 14:23), the land to the north and east were
cut off with the mountain cordilleras that then blocked movement into the far
northern lands, what Mormon called “the land which was northward” (Alma 63:4).
Top Left: The Occidental Cordillera (yellow area), Andean mountains 13,940 feet
elevation, 750 miles long and 234 miles wide, covering 33.297 square miles,
blocked all movement north from the Land of Promise into the Panamanian isthmus;
Top Right: Puente de Occidente (Occidental Bridge) that crosses the raging Rio
Cauca River (part of the Magdalena River), 140 miles in length running parallel
with the Occidental Mountain range and uncrossable, especially by women and
children; Bottom: The Western Occidental Cordillera blocking foot movement into
Panama
Thus, in the Andean area, further movement north was not
possible even after the Andes rose and the Panama Isthmus rose up connecting
Central and South America, because the mountain chain across northern Colombia
was impassable for a retreating army with women and children. Today, tunnels have
been cut through these mountains to allow for northward movement into Panama.
Also, Mormon could not go east because of the sheer height of the Andes (it
wasn't until the late 19th century that movement across the mountains was made
possible, though dangerous, with most later movement across the Andes done by
airplane.
The tunel de
occidente (Occidental Tunnel—tunnel through the Andean Occidental Cordillera),
sometimes referred to as the Tunnel of the West that opened in 2006, is the
Autovia (Autopista) and is about 3 miles long
Mormon and the Nephites were boxed into the Land Northward
once they signed the treaty dividing their lands (Mormon 2:28). They no longer
had access through the narrow pass into the Land Southward. As a result, when
the conditions deteriorated so badly that a final battle was inevitable, Mormon
chose the best battle ground location available to him, the Land of Cumorah
(Mormon 6:2). In some way, he thought that land might allow him to gain an
advantage over the Lamanites (Mormon 6:4), though he evidently knew it would not and it proved not to.
The Land Northward was no longer landlocked after the events
in 3 Nephi, anymore than such would be today, except in 385 A.D., there were no
roads, trails or paths over or through the mountains, and we have no knowledge
of any Nephites having crossed that direction northward into Panama, and can
only assume the mountains were a major if not impassable deterrent for anyone,
especially women and children.
And obviously, the reason the Nephites who escaped went
south was because there was nowhere else to go. East were the mountains
"whose height is great," north were more of the mountains, west was
the ocean—that left south, which would not be a successful direction since the
south was totally controlled by the Lamanites, their hereditary enemy. However,
an attempt at escape was certainly worth the chance to those who went in that
direction, and more desirable than facing annihilation in a final battle--which is
one of the reasons that makes Sorenson's "all the best land" theory
a silly, if not desperate, comment.
Thus, once the Nephites were driven into the Land Northward,
and Mormon signed a treaty with the Lamanites, a last stand for the Nephites
was eventually inevitable. Mormon knew it, as did the Nephites themselves. One
can only imagine the thoughts that went through the minds of warriors, women and children alike, as they stood, with
nowhere to go, watching the coming of the huge Lamanite force. Mormon wrote
that their souls were filled with terror from the sight.
Del,
ReplyDeleteI am happy to see a full explanation of this. Common sense dictates that you don't have to make stuff up for it to be true. We don't have to be "creative" to explain what happened. Take the obvious.. and that is usually the truth.
Occam's Razor works everytime :)
ReplyDelete