It is interesting that within these three kings, Zeniff,
Noah and Limhi, that such a dichotomy appeared in just three generations of
spiritual and righteous opposites.
But what about the
people?
It is an understatement when the scripture says, “Noah…did
not walk in the ways of his father” (Mosiah 11:1). In fact, after being led by
Zeniff, a righteous man, and under whom they prospered in the land, the people
might have been disgusted by a king who took many wives and concubines,
committed whoredoms, set his heart upon wealth, spent his time in riotous
living, and became a winebibber.
However, what we learn from Noah’s early leadership is a
very important part of our knowledge of people in general, and our own
characters as well. For when Noah so drastically sinned, the people did not
hold fast to the principles taught by Zeniff. Instead they joined King Noah in
his sins, becoming idolatrous, drinking wine, and committing “whoredoms and all
manner of wickedness” themselves (Mosiah 11:2; Mosiah 11:7, 15).
It is a sad commentary on human nature that the carnal state
of all men seems to be held in check only by the righteousness of its leaders,
but when an evil man holds the highest office, the natural tendencies of
humanity seems to disappear. As Paul said, “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God,
neither indeed can be” (Romans 8:7), and also said in
Corinth, “For ye are yet carnal: for
whereas there is among you
envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?” (1
Corinthians 3:3).
No one brought the slavery of character upon the Nephites
when Noah came to power and exercised his evil leadership, but themselves.
Noah’s evil character rose to the surface like cream in milk, when he was no
longer held in check by the humanity around him. However, no one was forcing
the Nephites themselves to so become as well—only their own individual natures
that, when given the opportunity to express their own evil natures, that evil
nature rose to the top of their behavior as we see it happened with Noah.
Whatever was in Noah’s mind to accomplish is not written,
though it seems apparent that his interest was in creating the physical signs
of civilization—large and spacious public buildings, life-styles of the rich
mixed with worldly matters, and the pride of their hearts. It is written that
the people were “deceived by the vain and
flattering words of the king and priests” (Mosiah 11:7). But it seems much
more likely and accurate to say that the people were deceived by the natural
man who led them and within their own characters.
At heart, people admire and want brave leaders. No doubt
when the problems with the Lamanites began, the Nephites remembered that
instead of just “sending guards round about the land to keep the Lamanites out,”
that Zeniff in his leadership “sent his armies against them and drove them
back” (Mosiah 11:17-18), and that Zeniff fought against the Lamanites with his
own arm, even in his old age. And when Nephites fell, Zeniff, with his “own
hands, did help to bury their dead” (Mosiah 9:19). It was a different people
under Noah, who “did boast in their own strength, saying that their fifty could
stand against thousands of the Lamanites” (Mosiah 11:19), and “did delight in
blood, and the shedding of the blood of their brethren.”
Like the evilness that overtook the Jews, when the prophet
Abinadi came preaching repentance “they were wroth with him, and sought to take
away his life” (Mosiah 11:26), even before Noah heard of the prophet and
ordered his capture. Instead of realizing their errors, the people sided with
King Noah: “They hardened their hearts against the words of Abinadi, and they
sought from that time forward to take him” (Mosiah 11:29).
When at last Abinadi was captured, the people “carried him
bound before the king” and denounced him as a traitor and a false prophet
(Mosiah 12:9). In their pride they said: “O king, behold, we are guiltless, and
thou, O king, hast not sinned. We are strong…and thou shalt also prosper.” It
shows once again, that when evil rules, people become carnal and worldly, and
sin also. Which is what the psalmist wrote “When the righteous
are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the
people mourn” (Proverbs 29:2).
Instead of standing
against Noah and his evil priests and the sins of their leaders, the people
mirrored the evilness of their leaders and became like them. No doubt, this is
the reason the Brother of Jared said about their people wanting a king, “Surely this thing leadeth into
captivity” (Ether 6:23).
It was not that the
people didn’t know these things—they understood them well, but within every
civilization, every people, every group, there are those who are more
interested in doing evil than good, and if the opportunity presents itself,
they often leap at the chance. As Helaman wrote: “they who chose evil were more
numerous than they who chose good, therefore they were ripening for
destruction, for the laws had become corrupted” (Helaman 5:2).
King Noah tried to create the physical signs of
civilization. With the people’s taxes he “built many elegant and spacious
buildings; and he ornamented them with fine work of wood, and of all manner of
precious things” (Mosiah 11:8). He didn’t skimp on the palace or the temple,
either, and like many kings and government leaders in other ages of mankind, he
used impressive monuments and elegant facades to persuade the people that they
were a wealthy and mighty kingdom.
And the people “were deceived by the vain and flattering
words of the king” and his hand-picked priests (Mosiah 11:7). Perhaps they
relished their new “freedom” from what they considered the restraints of God’s laws—it certainly wouldn’t
be the first or the last time such action occurred for that very reason, after all, we see this very thing happening in our society today!
Perhaps they believed that Noah had made them a great people, there is
certainly a type for this thinking throughout history as well.
But if they had not allowed themselves to be blinded, they
might have seen some danger signs. Certainly one of the greatest men of the age
gave his life in trying to turn the tide away from Noah’s evil pursuits in his
call to the Nephites for their repentance.
Despite Noah’s power, which he used to get rich, to commit
adultery and all forms of evil, and to protect himself, he was weak in character. Even surrounded by
his guards and his priests, he was so frightened by Abinadi’s testimony that he
“was about to release him, for he feared his word” (Mosiah 17:11). However, his
priests goaded him and his fear swung to not supporting his priests and he
reversed himself and ordered Abinadi’s death.
Both Noah and his father, Zeniff, faced a massive Lamanite
invasion at the end of their reigns. But the difference between them is pointed
up most clearly by the ways they handled similar situations and in the way the
people reacted to their leaders.
(See the next post, “Unusual Men-Zeniff, Noah, Limhi - Pt
IV,” for the pivotal point that drove the Nephites back into Zarahemla and handed
over the Land of Nephi to the Lamanites permanently)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You are right, we should learn from those under King Noah. What problems do we have today? 2 Nephi 28:21 teach that those who are PACIFIED in Zion today are at risk to go to hell. Is it not a pacified spirit that teaches that the church leadership are guaranteed to never fail us? But is this not a just as much a possibility as the failure under King Noah? If there is a problem, but members are condemned for even considering there could be a problem, is that not even worse than the situation under King Noah?
ReplyDeleteThe scripture quoted relates to Satan leading the pacified away into carnal security (physical, especially sexual, needs and activities--sensual, erotic, lustful, lascivious,libidinous, lecherous, licentious, etc.). If Church leaders ever get to the point where such takes place, I would think the members would know it and rightfully rebel against it; however, such is not only not the case in the Church today, there is never a point where it has been. On the other hand, when the President of the land has sex in the White House, while on the phone with a foreign leader, one might suggest such is the case with the nation, yet recent history has shown us that half of the elected officials said that was O.K. and the news media saw no reason to raise an alarm--thus the people of the country were, and are, pacified. Personally, I fear for the country and its leaders, not the Church.
ReplyDelete