If
we are going to understand what Nephi told us, as well as all the others who
wrote in the scriptural record, and what Mormon abridged, and Joseph Smith
translated, we need to be less inclined to think we know more than those who
wrote that record, and more inclined to take their words at face value and try
to understand how that fits into the world then and now.
As
an example, when Nephi tells us he was “driven forth before the wind” (1 Nephi
18:8), we need to understand:
1.
Nephi’s ship had sails in which to catch the wind;
2.
The wind blew his ship forward with the wind aft (or behind);
3.
His direction of travel would be in the direction the wind blew;
4.
That the wind was blowing in the direction he describes when they entered the
ship and continued to do so;
5.
The wind was blowing toward the land of promise, i.e., blowing the ship in that
direction—or in a direction that would take them to the Land of Promise;
6.
Those winds that blew him toward the Land of Promise when first setting sail,
would continue to blow the vessel toward the promised land;
7.
As winds blow, they are affected by the Coriolis effect, land mass, changes in
temperature, pressure differences, and obstacles (mountains, etc.), on the
other hand, when the temperature and pressure remain the same, when there are
no obstacles, the winds tend to blow straight and constant—one of the few places in the world where this happens is along the Southern Ocean as the Prevailing
Westerlies and West Wind Drift circle the globe where there are no temperature
changes, no land or obstacles block the wind or cause changes;
8.
Before the Age of Discovery (1300-1900 A.D.), sails were fixed on large ships
and were dependent on the wind for movement; in some areas, especially in the
Mediterranean Sea, vessels were augmented with oars to compensate for times
when the wind did not blow in the desired direction;
9.
Sails In the ancient world were square
and were employed universally in the Mediterranean on the seagoing ships of the
Egyptians, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans.
10. Europe only knew of the square rig until late in
the Middle Ages, and in India, square sails were used into at least the seventh
century A.D.;
11. While square rigged sails had the advantage of
providing stability on large ships and in heavy seas, they lacked the
maneuverability of triangular (lateen) sails; however, square sails remained
the main type of sail on European vessels until the last days of sail;
12. Not until the lateen sail was introduced into
the Age of Discovery, could square-rigged sailing ships tack on rivers and in
narrow waters. The fore-and-aft sail had an advantage in that it can keep much
closer to the wind;
13.
Prior to the Age of Discovery, ships were mostly light in weight and had flat
bottomed hulls, so they could sail close to land, this is especially true of
trade ships around Indonesia because of the numerous islands, shoals, and conflicting
winds and currents;
14.
Initially, up to the 15th century, Europeans were limited to coastal
cabotage navigation using the barge (barca) or the balinger (barinel),
ancient cargo vessels used in the Mediterranean of around 50 to 200 tons.
These boats were fragile, with only one mast, with fixed square sails that
could not overcome the navigational difficulties of Southward oceanic
exploration, as the strong winds, shoals and strong ocean currents easily
overwhelmed their abilities;
Top: light coastal vessels, capable
of easy maneuvering in shallow seas, not strong enough for deep sea sailing;
Bottom: Strong, deep sea vessels with fixed sails incapable of much maneuvering
in coastal waters, but capable of deep sea sailing
15.
Rudders on most ships allowed the vessel to be steered during winds only within
a few degrees. Even during the Age of Discovery, rudders had minimal use other
than altering a straight course until tacking came into use;
16.
Large, deep ocean ships did not exist in 600 B.C. that were capable of
withstanding the pounding of high seas. Even if they did exist, they could not
have been used around land because of their deeper draft; thus during the Age
of Discovery, before docks and piers were more common, most ships dropped
anchor off shore in deep water and took small boats to shore. They certainly
would not have been able to sail through Indonesia;
17.
Trading vessels in the Arabian Sea, Andaman Sea, and Indonesian waters were
small, coastal vessels—they were small for maneuverability among the many
islands, shoals, and shallows where they sailed and set in. They were light
weight for easy handling and quick passage. Any ship large enough to go into
deep water would not have been involved along these trade routes;
18.
The famous Polynesian sailors used outrigger canoes—some fairly large and
capable of carrying as many as 20 people, though usually they carried ten or
less; and were not involved in lengthy voyages and invariably sailed across
currents (neither with nor against winds), and used tall, narrow sails on
movable rope tie-downs, allowing movement of sails to catch cross winds, somewhat
like the system Arabian sailors on dhows
used for maneuverability in coastal and shallow waters;
The
point of all this is that sailing in Lehi’s day was dependent upon the wind
filling a fixed square sail (some were very large), and pushing the boat
forward, propelling it across the seas—meaning the ship went where the wind
blew. Thus, when Nephi wrote that his ship was “driven forth before the wind,”
he is telling us that his ship went where the winds took him. So did Nephi know and understand that
his ship was being propelled by winds, and that his vessel was dependent upon
the winds for his direction? The only answer can be yes, since he tells us that
he understood that the winds were driving his ship toward the Land of Promise.
And did Nephi know his
directions? The only two times he states any direction at all in terms of
compass points is during their several year trek along the Red Sea and across
the desert to the Arabian Sea, and both times he was absolutely accurate,
though he was in an area in which he had never before been (1 Nephi 16:13;
17:1). So if he knew his directions that well, why would he not have known the
cardinal and ordinal directions when he landed in the Land of Promise? It seems
likely that Nephi knew what he was talking about, and he made it crystal clear
in his plain and simple language that he was moving toward the promised land,
away from the Arabian coastline into the Arabian Sea (Irreantum Sea) under
power of the wind in his sails. We should take his word for it and not try to
find some other explanation.
No comments:
Post a Comment