As a result of our recent series of
posts on the Jaredites, a reader sent me in some counter information from an
internet site, which in part, was claimed:
“They built barges on
which to cross ‘many waters.’ They continued until they came to ‘that great sea
which divideth the lands.’ They remained on the seashore for four years during
which time they constructed eight vessels for crossing the sea. How far they
traveled we can only guess. That guess places the terminus of their land
journey on the Pacific shores of the Asian continent. From there the prevailing
winds ‘never cease to blow towards the promised land.’”
Where and in what direction winds blow and waves move is an all important knowledge to acquire before starting to determine where the Jaredites went and from where they entered the sea
It is poor scholarship such as this
that causes readers to misunderstand the scriptural record by mis-attributing
and misquoting or quoting out of context information in a manner that causes
confusion. While most of these are innocent mistakes, and people can look up
the scriptural record to verify the information, the end result is that most people
accept what they see in print, or make up their mind about it, and fold that information into their storehouse
of data they have on a subject. The problem is that most of us are lazy readers—we do not
take the time to verify information we read. The other side of the problem is
that those who choose to write about the scriptural record do not often use the
scriptural reference for their statement, and certainly few use it often enough
to make it easy for the person reading the information to look it up and verify
its veracity. Some might say it is deliberate; however, the point is scriptural
references, because they are short and do not detract from the reading when
inserted, should be used as often as such a quote is given.
As an example, in this statement above,
there is not a single reference given, nor a complete quote provided, so that a
person could easily look up the five different scriptural quotes. There is also
a very big assumption made that is not supported by any of the scriptural
references referred covered. Thus, a reader, even if they looked up the first
six chapters of Ether, in which this information is contained, would have to
read through several pages to try and find these quotes. In this way, readers
lose interest in trying to verify and take the easier road to acceptance, which
again leads to misunderstanding without realizing it.
As an example:
1. They
built barges on which to cross ‘many waters.’
The Jaredites built barges to transport themselves, their animals,
food and supplies across the “many waters”
This is a correct statement found in
Ether 2:6. It should additionally be noted that these barges were built under, and
the travel was directed under, the Lord’s guidance “being directed continually by the hand of the Lord” (Ether 2:6), which becomes
of greater interest later when the Lord has the Jaredites build more barges
along the seashore of the Great Sea. It also provides an understanding that the
Jaredites were not “on their own” as to what course to take, but were
“directed” by the Lord continually along their path—a journey, by the way that
took “many years” (Ether 3:3), and obviously much direction, which also gives
us a greater understanding of the spirituality of these families and the Lord’s
involvement in their emigration to the promised land.
2.
They continued until they came to ‘that great sea which divideth the lands.’
Again, a correct statement found in
Ether 2:13; however, another sea mentioned in Ether (sea in the wilderness
[2:7]) is left out though it is an extremely important issue in determining or
verifying direction of travel, for there are only so many “seas” in any
direction from Mesopotamia that the Lord would call “a sea.”
Considering this in the mix, both as to
what “many waters” the Jaredites crossed in their first barges, and the “sea in
the wilderness” to which would be appealing enough for the Jaredites to want to
stop and settle that the Lord cautioned them against it, are two important
ingredients skipped over as though they were unimportant in determining the end
result of their travel—the so-called “Pacific shores of the Asian continent.”
Stated differently, when writing about
or discussing a scriptural event, it is imperative that all information
pertaining to that event be covered, at least briefly, so the reader/listener
gets the full correlation of the total information.
3.
They remained on the seashore for four years during which time they constructed
eight vessels for crossing the sea.
There are three important issues here:
a) they did spend four years at the seashore, b) they did not call upon the
Lord during this time, and c) they did not build barges during those four
years, which shows an erroneous statement regarding this information.
a. The fact that the Jaredites spent
four years on the seashore is, in and of itself, perhaps not important other
than to understand that during that time they (b) neglected to call upon the
Lord. That is, they were acting on their own without finding out what the Lord
had in mind for them—which was to continue to the Land of Promise, for as he
told them, “he would that they should
come forth even unto the land of promise, which was choice above all other
lands, which the Lord God had preserved for a righteous people” (Ether
2:7). Stated differently, the Jaredites during those four years, in effect, had
said to the Lord, “we don’t need you any more, this is where we will settle.”
The Lord “chastened” the brother of
Jared, and called it a “great evil” that he had done, to which the brother of
Jared repented (Ether 2:15), suggesting that when we are in the service of the
Lord, we need “to call upon him” regularly, and be ready and receptive to his
direction at all times. The brother of Jared (as did the author of the above
statement) neglected this very important part of the journey, which is that we
are not to stop when we want in the Lord’s service—but continue on until the
work is completed. This was a great issue for the Jaredites, a learning
experience for the brother of Jared, and one for the readers of the scriptural
record. It is poor scholarship to outright eliminate it even if it is not the
main impetus of the writing.
The other issue (c) is even more
important and that is to so misread the scriptural record that one can write
erroneously about it when repeating the simple story—the Jaredites did not build barges during those four
year they stayed on the seashore.
The major point of this entire story at
the seashore is to understand that the Jaredites had abandoned their following
the Lord to the promised land—the intent and purpose of the Lord guiding them
away from Babylon and the end result of his effort.
After all, “he would that they should come forth even unto the land of promise,
which was choice above all other lands, which the Lord God had preserved for a
righteous people” (Ether 2:7).
After four years of dwelling in tents
upon the seashore (Ether 2:13), the “Lord came again unto the brother of Jared”
(Ether 2:14), and after chastisement and repentance, “the Lord said: Go to work
and build, after the manner of barges which ye have hitherto built” (Ether
2:16).
To write that the Jaredites had spent
four years at the seashore building barges is to misunderstand completely the
“evil they had done,” the “chastening” the Lord did, and the “repentance of the
evil,” by the brother of Jared.
4.
How far they traveled we can only guess.
Both an inaccurate and unnecessary
statement—from Mesopotamia to the Pacific shores (the course of this comment) of the Asian continent are
clearly understood and would have been a distance of about 4000 miles—a very
long distance to basically walk for women, children, babies, flocks of animals
of every kind, and carrying an enormous amount of supplies for a “many years”
travel, plus containing swarms of bees and having barrels of water containing
fish to transport.
Secondly, we need not be guessing about
the scriptural content. It is quite clear and with the understanding of the
reader, it becomes clearer through the “pondering” we have been asked to do in
reading the scriptural record.
5. That
guess places the terminus of their land journey on the Pacific shores of the
Asian continent.
There is absolutely nothing in the
scriptural record to suggest that the Jaredites traveled eastward from the
Valley of Nimrod, that they crossed 4000 miles of three deserts, three high
mountain ranges, and the lengthy Steppes. Orson Pratt spoke of the Jaredites
crossing the Pacific Ocean from the China coast in 1868, and Hugh Nibley outlined
that eastward trek across the Steppes, a direction and journey so many people
have repeated over the years without considering the facts of the matter.
6. From
there the prevailing winds ‘never cease to blow towards the promised land.’”
It might do well for people repeating
this scriptural statement to understand where winds blow, since they blow in a
continual pattern all year long and have always done so. They certainly do
not blow from the “Shores of the Asian continent” toward the Western
Hemisphere—in fact, the winds along the shore of the Asian coast do not even
blow into the Pacific Ocean—it is one of the major reasons no movement from west to east across the
Pacific was ever recorded until nearly 4000 years after the time of the
Jaredites and two thousand years after Lehi's voyage.
The point is, that when one writes
about the scriptural record, one might want to spend some time understanding
the record before just writing about it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment