(8) Merchant Class
Using Weights and Measures tied to gold, silver and grain (Alma 11)
Response: First of all, this information has nothing to do
with “merchants” or the “merchant class,” since merchants are those who buy and
sell goods. Mormon is writing about Zeezrom a lawyer, and the lawyer-judge
group, or Professional Class, who were wicked and interested only in “getting
gain.” Secondly, the Nephite monetary system was not tied to grain; Mormon uses grain only as a comparative value. Third, the entire concept stated above is
based on a misunderstanding of Mormon’s insertion into Alma’s record. At the
time of this information, Mormon is abridging Alma’s report about Zeezrom, the
wicked lawyer who tempted Amulek with a bribe, for “the object of these lawyers
was to get gain, and they got gain according to their employ” (Alma 10:32,
11:1).
For us to understand the importance or value of this bribe, Mormon
then inserts the monetary system of the Nephites so the amount or size of
Zeezrom’s later bribe could be better appreciated. Mormon states: “Now
these are the names of the different pieces of their gold, and of their silver,
according to their value.” Thus it should be understood that Mormon is talking
about gold and silver values as they were pieced, or “coined,” or sized, just
as the early Spaniards talked about “pieces of eight,” which was a coin, and
just as we would talk about silver and gold coins in the early days of this country.
Mormon continues: “And the names are
given by the Nephites, for they did not reckon after the manner of the Jews who
were at Jerusalem; neither did they measure after the manner of the Jews; but
they altered their reckoning and their measure, according to the minds and the
circumstances of the people, in every generation, until the reign of the
judges, they having been established by king Mosiah” (Alma 11:4). Consequently,
while earlier reckoning was done on an individual city or regional basis,
according to “the minds and circumstances” of the people at the time, King
Mosiah, before he stepped down after creating a government system of judges,
established a monetary system, which was then used throughout the Nephite nation.
The point here is that Mormon wrote:
“these are the names of the different pieces of their gold, and of their
silver, according to their value.” That is no different than any civilization
system of money. In the early days of the United States, money was based on
gold and silver, and each gold piece had a value—coins were established for
ease of use—wherein there were Quarter Eagles ($2.50), Half Eagles ($5.00),
Eagles ($10.00) and Double Eagles ($20.00) gold pieces. In 1849-1889, a gold
coin (about the size of today’s quarter) was worth $1.00 and equivalent to nearly
a day’s wage. In stating the Nephite monetary system, Mormon knew he was doing
so for future readers (Mormon 3:17) who would be living in an entirely different
economic time and system. Thus he was faced with the problem of equivalency.
That is, trying to show an equivalent value between the Nephite coinage and
that of some future generation.
As an example, when I was first
married, I was making about $600.00 per month, which paid for a new car
(Corvette), an apartment, utilities, food, entertainment, etc., etc., etc., and
provided us a nice living. Today, fifty years later, $600 won't even pay for
an apartment rental. Understanding equivalency over time can be difficult. As
an example, $600.00 then is equivalent to $4,224.00 today in buying power
(annual inflation has been about 4.33% per year).
So in order to do this, Mormon used an
equivalent system that he believed would have meaning centuries later—that of
food, or more accurately, of grain. Thus Mormon begins comparing one coin with
another (like the quarter, half, eagle and double-eagle above) and their value each
coin compared to another, then shows an equivalency with grain (Alma 11:5-19),
so the reader can both see the value of one coin to another, and the value of
the coin itself—that is, stating its buying power.
If I were to say that I earned $600.00
before taxes when I was married, to most people today that would seem like
peanuts. But by comparing its buying power, rent, car, food, entertainment,
etc., you get a better understanding of the wage. Mormon is simply telling us
the value of different coins by what they could buy, using grain as a standard
since grain (food) would always be known.
A good equivalent measurement is to show how much money it took to
purchase something all ages and periods of time would understand—the purchasing
power of money to buy food
Thus, he tells us that 1 senum of
silver was equivalent of a measure of any grain (Alma 11:7), 1 amnor of silver
was worlth two senums (Alma 11:11); 1 ezrom of silver was worth four sunums
(Alma 11:12); 1 onti was as great as them all (Alma 11:13), or stated
differently 1 onti was worth 1 senum 1 amnor, and 1 ezrom, or 9 senums of
silver, or 9 measures of grain. So when Zeezrom bribed Amulek with six ontis of
silver to deny God (Alma 11:22), he was actually offering the combined total of
6 senums, 6 amnors, and 6 ezroms, or 54 senums of silver, which was equivalent
of 54 measures of grain. Put differently, if we were to say that 1 senum was
the same as (a bushel of barley today) it would be $4.40, then Zeezrom’s bribe
was worth $237.60. If one senum was worth today’s value of a bushel of wheat
($14.93 May price for Chicago soft red winter wheat), then the bribe would have
been $806.00.
Stated another way, a senum of silver
(or a senine of gold) was the pay of a judge for a day’s work (Alma 11:3).
Figuring an average of 22 days work in a month (5 days a week), a judge would
earn 22 senum a month. Six senum would be about one week’s work. By today’s standards,
if a lawyer earning $100,000 a year, that would work out to about $2,000.00
bribe.
Of course, we don’t know what a
“measure” meant. It could have merely been a scoop or ladle of grain, or a
quartern, sack, quarter, or a bushel. Biblical Ruth was given six measures of
barley for her mother-in-law Naomi which Boaz placed in her veil (Ruth 3:15),
and she evidently carried it into the city. On the other hand, in Cheshire,
England, a bushel is called a measure, and grain is sold by weight or by
measure (so many pounds per bushel).
Today, we measure grain by bushels and a
bushel of oats is 32 pounds; barley is 48 pounds; rye 56 pounds; corn
56 pounds; soybeans 60 pounds; and wheat, 60 pounds. Since the Nephite
system considered all grain the same value (Alma 11:7), we could arrive for
equivalency sake at 50 pounds of grain to a measure, or a senum was worth 50
pounds of grain. Thus, 6 ontis was worth 2700 pounds of grain, or approximately
$250.00. This is not to say how much it actually was, but merely to show how
the use of Alma 11 is and why Mormon stated the Nephite monetary system in that
manner.
An additional thought to keep in mind
is that Zeezrom’s bribe must have been quite large for the period since it was
meant to impress his audience, and also large enough to be thought an
enticement for a man to deny his beliefs Whatever the value of six days labor,
it was probably a sizeable amount. This is all speculation, of course, but it
should be understood that almost all cultures of antiquity had some type of
monetary system. Nor can anyone claim that a certain monetary system existed in
a certain regional local from 600 B.C. to 421 A.D. That information is simply
not available and is not a good criteria for finding the location of the Land
of Promise. As for Mesoamerica, it is claimed the cacao bean was considered the
Mayan monetary system as late as 900 A.D., and was also the Aztec monetary
system as well. However, Mesoamerican money was not based upon gold or silver
as was the Nephites.
Thus, it should be understood that the
Nephite monetary system was not tied to grain, but that it had a purchasing
power to buy so much grain, or so much of whatever the Nephite markets were
selling. Since no coinage of any type have ever been found in Mesoamerica, it
is only natural for Mesoamerican Theorists to claim the Nephites did not use
coins, or money of that nature, but used measures of grain for their value
system; however, Mormon makes it clear that the Nephite monetary system was
tied to gold and silver—“pieces” of gold and silver. A coin is a piece of metal
(gold, silver, nickel, etc.)
Also, it should be kept in mind that when Zeezrom said, "Behold these six onties, which are of great worth, I will give unto thee" (Alma 11:25-emphasis mine), he had them on his person and physically offered them to Amulek for the crowd to see. Other than coins, which have value beyond their size, Zeezrom would not have been carrying gold weight, grain, etc. Only coins would have been sufficient to fit this description.
Also, it should be kept in mind that when Zeezrom said, "Behold these six onties, which are of great worth, I will give unto thee" (Alma 11:25-emphasis mine), he had them on his person and physically offered them to Amulek for the crowd to see. Other than coins, which have value beyond their size, Zeezrom would not have been carrying gold weight, grain, etc. Only coins would have been sufficient to fit this description.
No comments:
Post a Comment