Continuing with the
comments previously mentioned in the last post, the first twenty-two comments
were answered in the previous seven posts, the twenty-third and additional
comments are answered beginning below:
Comment
#23 “Since the scriptures tell us that
the spirit would lead a gentile to the Land of Promise, and that gentile was
Columbus, and he came to Nort America, how can you claim the Land of Promise
was in South America?” Wendell P.
Response:
I do not claim the Land of Promise was South America. I have always claimed the
Land of Promise was the entire Western Hemisphere. However, the Book of Mormon
lands, as outlined mostly by Mormon, was in the Andean area of South America. Hagoth’s
ships took Nephites and Lamanites into Central America (mostly into that middle
area we call Mesoamerica) in the first century B.C., and obviously later
generations of Nephites and Lamanites entered North America where Joseph Smith
found the bones of the white Lamanite Zelph, and where Onandagus was a prophet
known from the Atlantic Ocean to the Rocky Mountains. On the other hand, Columbus
never set foot in North America. He discovered islands in the Caribbean, southern
Central and the northeastern shores of South America. He never stepped foot on
what we now know as the United States. His first two voyages were only to the
Bahamas, his third to the Bahamas and the Northern portion of South America,
and his fourth to the Bahamas and southern Central America. Based on 1 Nephi
13:12, this makes Central and South America, and the islands of the Caribbean
part of the Land of Promise.
Comment #24 “I agree with all your writings, especially
your book Lehi Never Saw Mesoamerica,
which I thoroughly enjoyed. I do have one problem, however, and would love
clarification. How can Central and South America be termed a “land of liberty,”
with no kings upon the land as 2 Nephi 10:11 says? Even Canada in North America
has a monarch.” Darlynn
Response: The term This
land, means both North and South America and the families of islands that
geographically and naturally belong and adhere to the same—what we call the
Western Hemisphere. Orson Hyde said, “There are promises and decrees of God in
relation to ‘land’ of an extraordinary character. No other land can boast of
the same: that no foreign prince, potentate, or sovereign will be allowed to
interfere in the affairs of this Continent! Spain must give up Cuba; England,
Canada and the United States of America must hold, as her dependencies, every
country on the Western Continent, with the islands along its borders.” In fact,
since Hyde’s death in 1878, almost all the lands in the Western Hemisphere have
gained their independence from foreign monarchs and governments. B.H. Roberts,
in History of the Church, p. 552, stated: “…these two American
continents [North and South]. These continents are a promised land.” As for
liberty, all of the Western Hemisphere today enjoys an unprecedented amount of
liberty found on no other continent or land where multiple countries co-exist.
It is, indeed, a remarkable land. As for Canada, there is no monarch (king or
queen) on the land—Canada is ruled by a representative government, elected by
the people, with a Prime Minister in charge. The British monarchy is little
more than a figurehead, even in England.
Comment #25 “The Book of
Mormon does not specifically say that Columbus was the gentile to be led to the
discovery of this land.”
Response: True. However,
just about everyone recognizes the scriptural record is stating that the
gentile was Columbus—even Columbus himself. In the 1879 Book of Mormon, Orson
Pratt added the footnote to 1 Nephi 13:12 which named this “gentile” as
Christopher Columbus. Columbus began writing a book called “Book of Prophecies”
and in this book “set forth views on himself as the fulfiller of biblical
prophecies! Columbus saw himself as fulfilling the ‘islands of the sea’
passages from Isaiah and another group of verses concerning the conversion of
the heathen. Watts reports that Columbus was preoccupied with ‘the final
conversion of all races on the eve of the end of the world,’ paying particular
attention to John 10:16: ‘And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold’
(see also 3 Nephi 16:3). He took his mission of spreading the gospel of Christ
seriously. ‘made me the messenger of the new heaven and the new earth…He showed
me the spot where to find it,’ Columbus wrote in 1500.”
Comment
#26 “You say that no king has actually
reigned upon this land (Western Hemisphere), but you conveniently forget Nephi
was king, as was Benjamin and both Mosiahs, who ruled for some 400 years, not
to mention the several Lamanite kings mentioned.” Conce
Left: King Benjamin; Center: King
Noah; Right: King Mosiah II who did away with kingships
Response:
I suppose it is arguable that Nephi was a “king,” since he rejected that title.
However, perhaps a clearer understanding of the scriptural reference involved
will clarify this point. 2 Nephi 10:11 reads: “…
and there shall be no kings upon the land, who shall rise up unto the Gentiles”
Now, if you took the comma out of the sentence, it would read “… and there
shall be no kings upon the land who shall rise up unto the Gentiles” which is
more understandable and states the gentiles would still have been the
non-Israelite “others” and that no other kings shall stand against the Nephites
if they are righteous, for their true king is Yahweh who has promised to
preserve them. Stated differently, if you apply the promise to the time after the
gentiles reach the land of promise, then it holds true—no kings on the land.
Comment
#27 “Some
LDS scholars believe that the Tehuantapec model in Mesoamerica provides enough
of a match with existing geography, ancient cultures and ruins, to propose
plausible locations for certain Book of Mormon places and events. Can you place
the various Book of Mormon cities in your model of South America?” Charles
Response: In order to make any
comparison between a Book of Mormon city and an actual area in any model today,
there has to be specific information in the scriptural record to lead one to do
so. Except for a very few instances, such as King Noah’s tower, which was
identified by early Spanish conquistadors in Cuzco, Peru; the narrow neck of
land with a width somewhere under 50 miles and probably closer to 25 to 30; the
city of Desolation to the north of this narrow neck, but quite close; and the
Land of Many Waters in the Land Northward described by Mormon with fountains
(springs), rivers, lakes, etc., there are simply not enough descriptions in the
record to pinpoint any area specifically. Those who do so, are simply guessing
and do themselves, their readers and followers, the Book of Mormon, and the
Church in general, a disservice. On the other hand, one can look at a model and
speculate where a few city locations would be, such as Zarahemla (west of the
Sidon River, in the southern portion of the Land of Zarahemla); the city of
Bountiful, near the narrow neck of land, etc., the head of the Sidon River in
the hills or mountains between Zarahemla and the City of Nephi, the city of
Manti near that river’s head, etc. But, again, this is mere speculation, and as
long as it is stated as such, it is interesting to see where places might have
been.
(See
the next post, “Answering Recent Comments – Part IX,” for more comments made
about different posts on this website)
No comments:
Post a Comment