Nephi, coming from a farming background and obviously familiar with animals of his area knew these animals were not called by other names, for Lehi and his sons knew the names of farm animals, such as cow and the ox, and the ass and the horse, and the goat and the wild goat (the latter not being a farm animal)—these animals were known in Jerusalem and frequented the outlying farms and region, and Lehi would have had his share of these animals living outside the city walls, “having dwelt at Jerusalem in all his days” (1 Nephi 1:4).
Yet, according to Reynolds and Sköjdahl, “Commentary on the Book of Mormon, Vol. 1., p. 190-192, they claim that Lehi’s party, coming from farming backgrounds, didn’t know the name of the animals they saw and Nephi named. The same is true with John L. Sorenson, writes after listing the animals Nephi recorded: “It is easy enough to list these names, but what do they signify? The answer is not obvious. Consider for a moment Nephi’s statement that upon reaching the promised land they found both ‘the goat and wild goat’ in the forest of their new-found land (1 Nephi 18:25). How did an untamed “goat” different from a “wild goat”? The traits distinguishing the categories are not apparent” (An Ancient American Setting for the Book of Mormon, Deseret Book, Salt Lake City,1985, p289).
The problem here lies in the fact that Sorenson, like so many theorists, evidently has not bothered to know what animal categories are being discussed but ventures forth an opinion that so often, as it is here, in error. As we have written here many times, there is a distinct different between a goat (Capra aegagrus hircus)—whether domestic or untamed—and a “wild goat” (Capra aegagrus or the Capra aegagrus cretica).
Left: Domestic Goat found on farms throughout the world; Right: Wild Goat. They are two completely
different animals, though they both stem from a common ancestor. Wild goats
are found around most of the world, including in the Middle East, and Nephi
would have been acquainted with both the goat and the wild goat. A little bit
of research on Sorenson’s part would have borne this out--but evidently he does not let research get in the way of his opinions
Top: the Alpaca; Bottom: (Left) a cow; (Right) goats. These animals are
not similar in any way other than that they are all quadrupeds
Yet, this does not hold true with an understanding that Lehi and his sons knew those animals and there was nothing resembling them that they found in the Land of Promise except for two animals, which they called, because of the Ether record, the Curelom and Cumom (Ether 9:19). Thus, we see that when the Nephites did not know an animal, they did not make up a name for it, but called it by the name it was known to the Jaredites—the Curelom and Cumom.
Somehow the understanding of this seems to have escaped Reynolds and Sjödahl, who seem to feel they need to change Nephi’s writing and that of Mormon so it conforms to current scientific thinking. But the Book of Mormon stands on its own merits, is completely accurate, and the words and names within its pages are exactly as the Lord wanted us to know, with the Spirit acknowledging Joseph Smith’s translation.
So, if there were cows, oxen, goats, sheep, horses, elephants, etc., and since science claims there were none in the Western Hemisphere after the period of their earlier extinction and prior to the Spaniards bringing them here, what happened to them?
First of all, certain animals that existed in the Americas, such as the “deer and stags, the roe and the fallow deer, and such "wild animals" as foxes, lions, tigers, rabbits, etc.” Before going on with Reynolds and Sjödahl, let us ask a simple question: “Where did these wild animals come from?” They were here when the Spanish came according ot Garcilasso Inca de la Vega, in his Royal Commentaries, yet centuries earlier the Flood had destroyed all living things on the entire planet (Genesis 7:21-22) other than what Noah carried in his Ark.
So where did they come from and how did they get to the Americas?
Since the only people we know about that came to the Americas after the Flood and before the Spanish were the Jaredites, Lehites and Mulekites, and of those three, the only ones we know who brought animals “of every kind” were the Jaredites, it seems safe to say that those animals arrived in the Americas from the Jaredites.
It doesn’t matter what the Inca called them, as Garcilasso Inca de la Vega points out when he writes: “The Inca, when describing the strange animals to his Spanish readers, compares them with "horses," "cows," "goats," just as the Prophet did twenty centuries before him, in his record, which I take to be a strong proof of its authenticity,” since the Inca would not have known where they came from or what they were called in Nephite times (The Inca came along about 1000 years after the Nephites were annihilated).
So when Reynolds and Sjödahl claim that the Spaniards, on their arrival here, encountered a difficulty similar to that which Nephi must have experienced,” is completely without merit.
The Spaniards knew what deer looked like, as well as oxen, cows, horses, goats, sheep, and donkeys. The only trouble they should have had was in identifying the curelom and cumom, and both of their ancestors, the guanaco and vicuña. What they called these four animals is not known, but may have been the stories told of calling some animals deer because they looking similar.
Top: Vicuña ancestor of the Llama;
Bottom: Deer. These look similar, and probably led to the Spanish calling the Vicuña
a deer
This is not an accurate statement, since the Inca did not know these animals by the names used in the Book of Mormon. But it is where the current animal classification name (vicuña) came from, which was the Inca Quechua name (wikuna); guanaco (Quechua name wanaku); llama (Quechua: llama); and the alpaca (Aymara: allpaqa).
However, Garcilasso Inca de la Vega wrote: "There are other animals in the Antis, which are like cows. They are the size of a very small cow, and have no horns."
Top: Cow; Bottom: Tapir. The tapir
has a narrow head with a long snout that looks nothing like a cow, whose head extends
upward on a neck, while the tapir does not, and the tapir has no large udder (milk
sack); a cow weights upwards of about 2000 pounds (small cow 1000 to 1800
pounds), while the average tapir weighs only 550 pounds—not much of a match in
anything
The Tapir did not exist west of the Andes area as
shown above (dark red=extinct; dark yellow=extant; light yellow=probably
extant)
No suggestion of some other type of animal. The Spanish recognized that these animals were unlike any other they had ever seen or knew about and took their name from the native Quechua word for them.
(See the next post, “Beasts in the Forest – Part III,” for more information regarding the animals and their names the Nephites found in the Land of Promise)
No comments:
Post a Comment