Map of the ancient seas (dark blue) covering
much of South America (light green),
including the highland areas, depressions, and the Purus Arch (red) that later
blocked the Amazon Sea’s outflow into the Atlantic.
Note the Thrust Front (above) along the West Coast of South
America. The Nazca tectonic plate moved eastward and subducted beneath the
South American tectonic plate, causing the latter to rift, tilting the South
American plate upward along the east coast.
(Image B – When
the sea covering Amazonia receded, the Pebasian Sea became a river. This Pebas
River today runs past the city of
Pebas where it empties into the Amazon River. This is all that is left of the
once gigantic Pebasian Sea, the northern arm of the sea that covered most of
South America from Patagonia to Colombia
According to Lovejoy, Albert and Crampton, South America foreland
basins (depressions) were areas of constant marine incursions, which occurs
when saltwater is drawn-in from the Sea into freshwater aquifers and basins that are below sea level. There were, of
course, a few eustatic sea-level rises to break up the open sea. According to
Lundberg, these incursions occurred along several lowland areas of foreland
basins adjacent to the Andean Chain.
Some of these shallow marine (sea) incursions spread into
southeastern Bolivia and into several of the intracontinental basins in South
America’s Pebas formation in Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, and Venezuela.
The loading (rising) of the Andes was responsible for the marine transgression
of the Paranense Sea that invaded most of the Andean foothills between 40º South
and the Maracaibo area. This transgression—the spreading of the sea over land as
evidenced by the deposition of marine strata over terrestrial strata—shows a
relative rise in sea level resulting in deposition of marine strata over
terrestrial strata. The sequence of sedimentary strata formed by transgressions
and regressions provides information about the changes in sea level during a
particular time.
According to neotectolnics expert, Allaoua Saadi, along the core
area of the Brazilian shield there are also enclaves of tectonically developed
lowland areas or depressions that were not directly related to the evolution of
foreland basins but to the constant tectonic reactivation events undergone by
the complex system of faults of the crystalline basement. Examples of such
areas are the Araguala and Tocantins depression
The map shows sedimentary basins in yellow, with the highlands in red. The sediment in the yellow areas was laid down from marine coverage (seas), which extended beyond this map of Brazil into Bolivia, Paraguay and eastern Peru
Ramos and Aleman claim an Amazon Sea stretched from the present day Andes to the Atlantic Ocean, along what they termed the Amazon Arm, (see top map) then along the Tethys Arm to the Paranense Sea that was open to the Atlantic along some 2000 miles of the east coast of Patagonia (Argentina).
Ramos and Aleman claim an Amazon Sea stretched from the present day Andes to the Atlantic Ocean, along what they termed the Amazon Arm, (see top map) then along the Tethys Arm to the Paranense Sea that was open to the Atlantic along some 2000 miles of the east coast of Patagonia (Argentina).
In 1909, C. H. Eigenmann, in his Reports of the Princeton University to
Patagonia 1896-1899, was the first to recognize the cis-Andean (Amazonia
and Guiana) foreland basins and associated lowlands in South America as
possessing an ichthyofauna (fish life
of the region) distinct from the river systems draining shield areas. His
“Amazon Province” is the combination of the lowlands of the Orinoco, Amazon,
and La Plata basins, in his words “the most extensive and intricate fresh water
system in the world…a network of rivers practically uninterrupted, extending
from the mouth of the Orinoco through the Cassiquiare, Rio Branco, Rio Negro,
Rio Madeira, Rio Guapore, Rio Paraguay, Parana and La Plata to Buenos Aires.”
He also recognized the relative youth of the lowlands
when compared with the highlands, as well as the ichthyofaunistic similarities between the Amazon and La Plata
basins. However, most subsequent authors failed to appreciate the distinction
between the ichtyhyofaunas from the
lowlands and shield areas.
In addition, he analyzed
sediments from two cores taken northeast of the mouth of the Amazon River and
concluded that the Amazon River formed through a three-stage sequence, which conflicts,
in part or wholly, with virtually every other recent proposal regarding the
evolutionary history of the Amazon Basin. And Figueiredo described the onset
phase as being prompted, in part, by global sea-level fall. Laurens showed that
global sea level is important because a sea level of 150-feet below mean sea
level is the threshold value required before sediment can reach the Amazon Fan,
as opposed to being distributed northwestward along the coast by the North Brazilian
Coastal Current.
Finally, sampling core drilling and finds along the eastern slope of the Andes
where Darwin found sea shells samples at 13,000 feet, and the work in the Argentine Puerto
Madryn formation shows numerous sea fossils at high altitudes, now far above
sea level, but obviously once beneath the sea.
The Madryn Uplift where sea shells
and numerous marine fossils have been found far above sea level, showing this
entire area was once underwater. Top: Puerto Madryn formation in Argentina:
LtoR, top to bottom 1) Fosssiliferous layers; 2) Bivalves; 3) Cirripeds; 4)
Bryozoa; 5) Ostreids; 6) Gasteropods; 7) Oysters; 8) Diatom; and 9) Radiolarian
All
of this shows conclusively that 1) most of South America east of the Andes was
at one time covered by the sea, and 2) the numerous depressions (lowlands) of
the continent are near, at or below sea level even today.
Could the top part of the andies have been pushed more to the left out towards the Pacific ocean at one time making this more of an arch? lookslike there is a pinch point. Also what is the time frame how many years ago would this have happened. I appreciate your work and I thank you.
ReplyDelete