However, Venice Priddis designed her map with information available to her at the time in 1975, but with modern knowledge, based on the past more than 40 years of study and work in South America, we have a better grasp of the geology of the area, ancient seabeds, and much else to paint a more accurate picture. No doubt, as the years progress, and geological work improves even more, we will know more.
Modern geologists claim this is what the continent looked like in ages
past, with the green areas above water. Therefore, if the Sidonian sailors
approached from the area #1, which is where the currents would have brought a
drifting vessel from across the South Atlantic, they could have seen two large
islands (Red Arrows), but not the far (yellow arrow) West Island (Land of
Promise). And in landing, they could have moved south along the coast to (maroon arrow) where
the Paraiba River is located 100 miles north of Rio de Juneiro and the location
of the inscription
The Inga
Stone inscriptions on a wall about 12 feet high and 150 feet long in Paraiba,
Brazil. No one knows how, by whom or for what reasons the inscriptions on the
rock were made. One of the many inscriptions talks about a “borders war” in
Mesopotamia—According
to Gabriele Baraldi archaeologist, epigraphist and Italian-Brazilian
alternative researcher, known as the “last atlantologist,” American proto-Hittite
controlled geothermal energy and apparently did hieroglyphics with mold by
applying high mechanical and thermal stress on the rock from the lava conduit
of an extinct volcano. Various theories claim the signs were carved by
ancient Indian cultures, while others suggested it was done by an unknown
ancient civilization that visited this region in the past
The inscription reads: “We are Sidonian Canaanites from the city of the Mercantile King. We were cast up on this distant shore, a land of mountains. We sacrificed a youth to the celestial gods and goddesses in the nineteenth year of our mighty King Hiram and embarked from Ezion-geber into the Red Sea. We voyaged with ten ships and were at sea together for two years around Africa [Ham]. Then we were separated by the hand of Baal and were no longer with our companions. So we have come here, twelve men and three women, into New Shore. Am I, the Admiral, a man who would flee? Nay! May the celestial gods and goddesses favor us well!”
In looking at this closely:
1. Sidonian. No doubt meaning people of Sidon who were Phoenicians;
2. Canaanites. Phoenicians would have been called Canaanites;
3. Mercantile King. During the Phoenician period, which would have included 350 B.C. at the very tail end of the Phoenician period, Phoenicia, or Tyre, as well as Carthage, controlled the mercantile business throughout the Meditrranean Sea, especially in 500 B.C.;
4. Mighty King Hiram. There were three kings of Sidon named Hiram. Hiram I was the son Abibaal (“Baal is my father”), and his son was Baal-Eser I. During his reign, Tyre grew from a satellite of Sidon into the most important of Phoenician cities, and the holder of a large trading empire. Hiram I allied himself with King David of the United Kingdom of Israel.
There was another King Hiram (II), this one reigned from 737-729 BC. Between these two kings was one named Pygmalion of Tyre (Pummay) who in his days the Phoenician trade empire shifted from the Middle East (land routes) to the Mediterranean (sea routes from trading settlement to trading settlement). Hiram III was king from 551 to 532 B.C., and Tyre then fell under Persian controls in 539 to 411 B.C.
Problems with this storyline:
• Why take ten ships around Africa? These were Phoenician traders—there was no known trade in Africa other than the slave trade and no slaver sailed around the Cape of Storms (tip of Africa) in search of slaves—the trade consisted of areas along the Gold Coast, a British Colony in the Gulf of Guinea in West Africa (today’s Ghana) and Somalia coast in the Sea of Arabia—there simply was no need to go around Africa to be involved in it; however, the slave trade as we know of it today really did not take place until around 1200 A.D. when Portuguese and Spaniards began exploring along the west African coast and the more that is known, the less blame we have to put on the Western Hemisphere nations for the slave trade with black Africa, since it was pioneered by the Arabs, its economic mechanism was invented by the Italians and the Portuguese, it was mostly run by western Europeans, and it was conducted with the full cooperation of many African kings—it should also be understood that in the early days (17,000,000 black African slaves were sold prior to 1750 by black Africans to the Europeans, and was a huge business for different African kingdoms;
2. Phoenicia or any other country was not capable of building deep ocean vessels in B.C. times and none are known to have existed except in speculative writing—whether or not a coastal ship blown off course might have survived the journey from the south of Africa to the east coast of South America, particularly around Touros or Natal at the point of Brazil, is certainly questionable—and if it did, it would not have been under its own power, which leads to the understanding of ocean currents.
The Egyptians, with access to the Mediterranean, also used larger seagoing vessels, called a “Byblos” boat and crossed to the eastern coast of the Mediterranean in order to obtain wood from Lebanon since wood was very scarce in Egypt; however, these were keel-less, flat-bottomed boats where stepped masts could not be used. One of the earliest known ship to sail the Mediterranean was built in 2500 B.C., and by 1100 B.C., the Egyptians were masters of the Mediterranean, though their ships were far inferior to those built by other peoples around them—their own ships were originally made up bundled reeds.
(See the next post, “The Paraiba Inscriptions and the Two South America Islands of Antiquity, Part III,” for more on this incident of the Paraiba Inscriptions and the two islands reported by ancient shipwrecked sailors)
2. Canaanites. Phoenicians would have been called Canaanites;
3. Mercantile King. During the Phoenician period, which would have included 350 B.C. at the very tail end of the Phoenician period, Phoenicia, or Tyre, as well as Carthage, controlled the mercantile business throughout the Meditrranean Sea, especially in 500 B.C.;
4. Mighty King Hiram. There were three kings of Sidon named Hiram. Hiram I was the son Abibaal (“Baal is my father”), and his son was Baal-Eser I. During his reign, Tyre grew from a satellite of Sidon into the most important of Phoenician cities, and the holder of a large trading empire. Hiram I allied himself with King David of the United Kingdom of Israel.
There was another King Hiram (II), this one reigned from 737-729 BC. Between these two kings was one named Pygmalion of Tyre (Pummay) who in his days the Phoenician trade empire shifted from the Middle East (land routes) to the Mediterranean (sea routes from trading settlement to trading settlement). Hiram III was king from 551 to 532 B.C., and Tyre then fell under Persian controls in 539 to 411 B.C.
Problems with this storyline:
• Why take ten ships around Africa? These were Phoenician traders—there was no known trade in Africa other than the slave trade and no slaver sailed around the Cape of Storms (tip of Africa) in search of slaves—the trade consisted of areas along the Gold Coast, a British Colony in the Gulf of Guinea in West Africa (today’s Ghana) and Somalia coast in the Sea of Arabia—there simply was no need to go around Africa to be involved in it; however, the slave trade as we know of it today really did not take place until around 1200 A.D. when Portuguese and Spaniards began exploring along the west African coast and the more that is known, the less blame we have to put on the Western Hemisphere nations for the slave trade with black Africa, since it was pioneered by the Arabs, its economic mechanism was invented by the Italians and the Portuguese, it was mostly run by western Europeans, and it was conducted with the full cooperation of many African kings—it should also be understood that in the early days (17,000,000 black African slaves were sold prior to 1750 by black Africans to the Europeans, and was a huge business for different African kingdoms;
2. Phoenicia or any other country was not capable of building deep ocean vessels in B.C. times and none are known to have existed except in speculative writing—whether or not a coastal ship blown off course might have survived the journey from the south of Africa to the east coast of South America, particularly around Touros or Natal at the point of Brazil, is certainly questionable—and if it did, it would not have been under its own power, which leads to the understanding of ocean currents.
The Egyptians, with access to the Mediterranean, also used larger seagoing vessels, called a “Byblos” boat and crossed to the eastern coast of the Mediterranean in order to obtain wood from Lebanon since wood was very scarce in Egypt; however, these were keel-less, flat-bottomed boats where stepped masts could not be used. One of the earliest known ship to sail the Mediterranean was built in 2500 B.C., and by 1100 B.C., the Egyptians were masters of the Mediterranean, though their ships were far inferior to those built by other peoples around them—their own ships were originally made up bundled reeds.
(See the next post, “The Paraiba Inscriptions and the Two South America Islands of Antiquity, Part III,” for more on this incident of the Paraiba Inscriptions and the two islands reported by ancient shipwrecked sailors)
The Brazilian Shield is quite interesting. Likely the Nephites/Lamanites either did not know about it's existence or it was likely of such a low elevation that it may not have been inhabitable. Do you have any information about when it was colonized? Since the Andes would have been higher in elevation it makes sense that this area would be inhabitable. Thanks for the great information.
ReplyDeleteWe posted a response to this which will be available shortly. Since a shield is that part of the crust and is permanent, it could have people living upon it as is the case today; however, archaeology results suggest that those living east of the Andes mountains were of a far more recent development and far more savage by nature.
ReplyDeleteMy wife and I are currently living in Brazil as LDS Humanitarian Missionaries. We are amazed at the high percentage of Brazilians that have indigeneous DNA. We are also amazed at how many cities have indigenous names.
ReplyDeleteThere is obviously a lot of remnants of the House of Israel in this great land. Based on Book of Mormon promises, the future is bright for this enormous country!
We know the route Lehi took to get to the "Promised Land," but to my knowledge we have no knowledge of how the Jaredites and Mulekites arrived here.
Since Pedro Alvarez Cabrel discovered the Northeastern part of Brazil in 1500 by being blown off course from the normal Portuguese sea lanes down the west coast of Africa, it seems logical that the Mulekites and Jaredites could have arrived via a similar route.
After all, if I lived in Babelonia at the time of the tower of Babel, or in Jerusalem at the time of King Zedikiah, the logical sea route out-of-town. It sure beats hiking all the way down to the Red Sea and finding resources to build your boat!
Since Phonecia was located in what is currently Syria, Lebanon and Israel, heading west in the Mediterranean Sea to the Rock of Gibraltar and then southwest along the coast of Africa would make sense to me. Once the trade winds kicked in, the rest would be history. And maybe it was. :-)
Alpenander: You might want to read some of our posts in this blog that deal with what you are talking about--you will find a lot of information and much of it contrary to what you are mentioning.
ReplyDelete