To clarify the scriptural record
on the matter, Nephi wrote: “After we had sailed for the space of many days we
did arrive at the promised land; and we went forth upon the land, and did pitch
our tents; and we did call it the promised land. And we did begin to till the
earth, and we began to plant seeds; yea, we did put all our seeds into the
earth, which we had brought from the land of Jerusalem. And it came to pass
that they did grow exceedingly; wherefore, we were blessed in abundance. And we
did find upon the land of promise, as we journeyed in the wilderness, that
there were beasts in the forests of every kind, both the cow and the ox, and
the ass and the horse, and the goat and the wild goat, and all manner of wild
animals, which were for the use of men. And we did find all manner of ore, both
of gold, and of silver, and of copper” (1 Nephi 18:23-25).
That is all that is written about
the landing site other than Alma’s comment: “and on
the west in the land of Nephi, in the place of their fathers' first inheritance,
and thus bordering along by the seashore” (Alma 22:28). So we know that the
landing site was along the seashore of the West Sea, somewhere to the south of
the dividing line between the Land of Zarahemla and the Land of Nephi, probably
far to the south; however, no temperature or climate is mentioned other than
the fact that the seeds brought from Jerusalem grew exceedingly and provided an
abundant harvest (1 Nephi 18:24), which, in 600 B.C. would require a climate
and soils like those in which the seeds had been grown, i.e., Jerusalem. Thus,
with Jerusalem having a Mediterranean Climate, this area of first landing would
also have to have a similar Mediterranean Climate.
This
point is inescapable. Even today with all the advances in agriculture, seeds will
not grow just anywhere, and every packet of seeds has a climate control on the
back, showing in what clime the seeds should be planted. But in 600 B.C., there
was no knowledge of such since farmers did not move about and seeds were always
planted in the same ground from which they were grown. As has been stated here
many times, the Pilgrims in 1620 learned that their seeds from England/Holland
would not grow in New England, and they would have starved except for the help
of local Indians.
In a vintage example of John L.
Sorenson’s rewriting of the Nephite record, the Mesoamerican guru states in his
book, An Ancient American Setting for the
Book of Mormon, on page 140:
“What
can we tell about the living conditions in the land of first inheritance? The
coastal plain where the landing of Lehi would have occurred was uncomfortably
hot and humid. That climate favored rapid crop growth, but the weather would be
unpleasant for colonizers.”
Nowhere around the Mediterranean
Sea is the coastal area hot and humid, and certainly not in Jerusalem. Nor do
we find in the scriptural record anything to suggest the temperature or
humidity, but that does not deter Sorenson from writing about it.
He goes not to write: “The Nephites soon fled up to the land of Nephi,
where the elevation permitted living in greater comfort.” The Nephites fled
from the land of their first landing because the lord told Nephi to leave
before his brothers killed him and take all those who would go with him (1
Nephi 5:5). While the Land of Nephi, at least that area where Nephi built his
city and temple, was on much higher ground, evidently in a high valley (Mosiah
7:5-6), there is no indication that it was a more comfortable place temperature
or weather wise.
Sorenson continues to write: “As Nephi tells the story, the Lamanites
down in the hot lowlands were nomadic hunters, bloodthirsty, near naked, and
lazy (2 Nephi 5:24, Enos 1:20). The circumstances of life in that environment
could account for some of those characteristics.”
It is interesting that Sorenson
feels the climate is the reason the Lamanites were nomadic hunters,
bloodthirsty, near naked and lazy. Obviously, Nephi and others, who had to have
lived in that area for at least one planting and harvesting season, if not
more, were neither lazy, bloodthirsty, or went around naked. More importantly,
Nephi tells us the problem with the Lamanites: “And he had caused the
cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity.
For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become
like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and
delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did
cause a skin of blackness to come upon them” (2 Nephi 5:21).
Thus, the Lamanites
were cursed by the Lord because of their iniquity and had hardened their hearts
against the Lord. According to Nephi’s nephew, the Lamanites were a ferocious
and bloodthirsty people, full of idolatry and filthiness, feeding upon beasts
of prey, dwelling in tents and wandering about in the wilderness with a short
skin girdle about their loins and their heads shaven, and constantly seeking to
destroy the Nephites (Enos 1:20). Jarom, the son of Enos
also described the Lamanites by saying “They loved murder and would drink the
blood of beasts” (Jarom 1:6). In all of this, there is no mention of a
temperature problem causing the Lamanite nature. Unfortunately, it is the nature
of Sorenson and other Mesoamerican Theorists to write in such a manner about
the Book of Mormon, which is nothing more than a rewriting of the Nephite
record.
Obviously, he and
others are driven by the fact that their Mesoamerican model has an area
that is hot and humid, and they write about it, describing the Land of Promise
in terms of their model, rather in terms of the scriptural record. For
instance, the Lamanites are never described as living “down in the hot
lowlands.” In fact, the land of first inheritance, or the land where Lehi
landed, is not mentioned in any way regarding its climate, nor throughout the
entire Book of Mormon is any temperature alluded to in the Land of Nephi--and generally, a seacoast environment is not considered hot and humid lowlands. Nor
is the temperature of their land ever suggested as the cause, or any cause, of
their behavior; however, Nephi tells us that “their cursing which was upon them”
was the cause and that “they did become an idle people, full of mischief and
subtlety, and did seek in the wilderness for beasts of prey” (2 Nephi 5:24). Like
so much of his book, and that of most Mesoamerican Theorists, Sorenson is adept
at making outlandish statements that agree with his Mesoamericam model, but
disagree with the scriptures, in such a way that the casual reader would accept
and never question his writing. There can be no other explanation but that
Sorenson deliberately misstates scripture to further his Mesoamerican model,
which cannot be supported in any other way. And it is certainly not a scholarly
approach to writing about the Book of Mormon.
No comments:
Post a Comment