It is in many circles today, more than ever before, becoming commonly questioned as to how the Incas were able to develop such an exquisite architecture without the use of the wheel and modern tools. The buildings they occupied and the Spanish conquistadors found in the Andes have withstood the last five centuries, and many before that, in an earthquake prone zone and provided the foundations of many buildings since before the Spaniards arrived.
So let us take these three sources one by one.
1) The Inca. The simple answer is that the Inca did not build any of these magnificent buildings or roads. The Inca were not engineers, builders, or laborers. They had little experience in building, did not construct the magnificent Sacsayhuaman, or any of the other outstanding sites in Andean Peru, nor did they build the 25,000 miles of roads and highways that criss-crossed the land anciently from Colombia to Chile, from Argentina to Bolivia. They did, however, occupy many of the buildings, fortresses and magnificent sites scholars and historians have assigned to their building. But occupying is not building.
In fact it is beginning to dawn on archaeologists that there is no such thing as Inca architecture—what had been attributed to them in the past was inherited by them from “pre-Inca civilizations.” Many archeologist still insist, however, that the Incas reproduced and updated many buildings, especially those in the Middle Horizon period 600 to 1000 A.D. However, many other studies have shown that the sites with the outstanding “perfect fit” architecture was developed before that time. But the point is that the Inca simply did not exist during that time—not even the most liberal dates place them before 1100 A. D. and no authentic source can place them in Cuzco Valley prior to about 1390 A.D.
The
Sanctuary of Pachacamac, credited to a later construction by the
Inca—Pachacamac itself was ancient long before the Inca and was a holy city
that drew the faithful from all over the Andean area anciently in both
pilgrimages and settlement (the foreground walls were part of ancient
Pachacamac)
One of the things that has to be kept in mind when dealing with Inca history, which is well recorded by early chroniclers, is that in newly conquered territories the Incas altered pre-existing buildings and made them into administrative centers—this did not take building skills, the land was full of ancient buildings that were still in excellent order. Again, the Inca are credited with adding new elements, such as in the Sanctuary of Pachacamac located south of Lima, but since the Inca had no written language, and their legends and myths—what many today call their “history”—is unverifiable, and in most cases known to be exaggerated to make their history look good to impress smaller tribes and intimidate them into submission, it is as much more likely that these other elements were built by other pre-Inca peoples as by the Inca. In fact, archaeologists, including Terence D’Altroy (The Incas, Blackwell, 2003, pp142, 194, 255, 315) claim Pachacamac was a religious center dating back 2000 years before the Inca (dating this site to 200 B.C.)
The site of
Pachacamac, a huge city complex named after the “Earth Maker” creator Pacha
Kamaq (Creator God of the heavens and earth—only Viracocha was more powerful),
the city buildings covers 2.3 square miles and has many enormous buildings and
large pyramids and numerous temples. A second section includes secular buildings
and palaces of mud-brick stepped structures with ramps and plazas. The main
temple is 98,425 square feet in size
Stonework
at Ollantaytambo in the Valley between Cuzco and Machu Picchu. The work there
is remarkable when more completely understood than tour guides explain
The precision seen, especially in the image above was far beyond the capability of the Inca, who had at best bronze tools. The only metal that could shape this granite, which is very high in quartz crystal content would be hardened carbon or cobalt steel, and even with those materials the work would be very difficult. At the western edge of the Ollantaytambo archaeological complex we find what is known as the Temple of the Condor. Here the ancient builders fit stones into the bedrock itself with astonishing accuracy, and created recesses of no known function. According to those who have worked there, the ideas by archaeologists that these recesses were originally made for gold objects is laughable.
The large dry stone walls display huge blocks that had been carefully cut to fit together tightly without mortar and with levels of precision unmatched anywhere else in the Americas. The stones are so closely spaced that a single piece of paper will not fit between many of the stones. This precision, combined with the rounded corners of the blocks, the variety of their interlocking shapes, and the way the walls lean inward have puzzled scientists for decades. The method used to match precisely the shape of a stone with the adjacent stones is still unknown.
Left: 12-angled cut stone in Cuzco;
Right: Newly discovered 13-angled cut found at Incahuasi in the valley of
Canete, close to the town of Lunahuana, built somewhat after the city of Cuzco
in layout
These cut stones and perfect fit as has been discussed here and previously, as an increasing number of archaeologists now admit, could not have been built by the Inca.
(See the next post, “So Who Built Sacsayhuaman and the Other Sites in Andean Peru? Part II,” for more on this subject)
No comments:
Post a Comment